This essay responds to Bob Herbert's argument in "A Fire in the Basement" by focusing on the state of American public education. The paper agrees with Herbert's diagnosis that public schools are underfunded and underperforming, and explores potential remedies at both the community and policy level. Drawing on sources about private-sector marketing strategies for schools, competing educational philosophies, and Finland's highly regarded public education model, the essay argues that meaningful reform requires balancing financial investment with a humane, student-centered approach to learning. It concludes that improving public education is both a social and civic imperative.
In his essay "A Fire in the Basement," Bob Herbert expresses his frustrations with the state of the country, illuminating in particular that "public schools [are] swarming with students but starved of books and supplies" (qtd. in Graff, Birkenstein, and Durst 396). Herbert's assertion that public education in America is in trouble is correct: resources are too taxed, school systems too apathetic, and students lack motivation. The best way to address this problem is to take a closer look at how schooling is structured and make drastic reforms at both a commercial and philosophical level.
As it stands now, public education — with all of its shortcomings — is still prized by Americans. In a 1999 poll, "more than 70% of those queried…favor improving the public schools over seeking an alternative system" (Rose 1999). There is still potential for the system that so many have faith in to be revitalized. People must stop looking to private schools, charter schools, and school vouchers to provide answers, and instead work to solve the larger systemic problems and lack of innovation that schooling in America faces today.
In an article about the relationship between education and business, Michael J. Manafo, a private school administrator, offers suggestions about how to incorporate marketing techniques from the private sector to make schools more effective. Several of these methods are grassroots and could be implemented by parents, faculty, or students themselves — for example, to "create a dynamic school website" and "publish a multipurpose view book" (Manafo 2006). He also mentions larger-scale projects related directly to fundraising.
His ideas are sound in arguing that communities must not look to the government alone for help in improving their schools. If major gift drives are enacted, a "strong alumni base" is cultivated, and schools move beyond "event fund-raising into institutional advancement," public schools may find themselves in a stronger position (Manafo 2006).
"Risks of over-prioritizing efficiency over human learning"
"Finland's education system as a reform benchmark"
An investment in education is an investment in the future. If we allow our school systems to degrade further, who knows what position our children will be in to compete in the world? In addition, the state of our education is a reflection of the kind of society we are building — and at present, we have not laid a strong enough foundation. Substantive reform, guided by both financial innovation and a commitment to humanistic values, is not only possible but necessary.
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.