Race and Labor Force Participation in Accounting
This paper examines racial, ethnic, and gender composition across three occupations — accounting, waiter/waitressing, and commercial painting — using data from the U.S. Census Bureau's 1990 census report. It compares the demographic breakdowns of these fields and evaluates whether the patterns align with scholarly arguments made by Kirschenman and Neckerman, Newman and Ellis, and Kandel and Parrado regarding race, employer perception, and minority labor force participation. Contrary to what those theoretical frameworks might predict, the data reveal surprisingly similar racial distributions across all three occupations, with gender — rather than race or ethnicity — emerging as the more pronounced dividing variable between fields.
- Introduction: Overview of three occupations and analytical approach
- Statistical Profile of Accountants: 1990 Census racial and gender breakdown for accountants
- Comparing Waitstaff and Painters to Accounting Demographics: Cross-occupational comparison of ethnicity and gender data
- Analysis Through Scholarly Frameworks: Testing census findings against race and labor theories
- Conclusion: Summary of gender patterns and racial similarity across fields
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses specific, quantitative data from a primary government source (U.S. Census Bureau) to ground all comparative claims, lending credibility to the analysis.
- Moves logically from descriptive statistics to cross-occupational comparison and then to critical engagement with scholarly literature, creating a clear three-part analytical structure.
- Arrives at a counterintuitive conclusion — that racial distributions were more similar across fields than expected — which demonstrates independent critical thinking rather than simply confirming existing theories.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies evidence-based argumentation by using census statistics to test theoretical predictions drawn from academic readings. Rather than accepting Kirschenman and Neckerman's employer-perception thesis or Kandel and Parrado's demographic projections at face value, the author interrogates them against empirical data — a model approach for undergraduate social science writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction, followed by a detailed statistical section on accounting. A comparative section then contrasts waitstaff and painting data against accounting figures, both by gender and by racial/ethnic category. The analysis section maps three sets of scholarly arguments onto the observed data, and a concise conclusion synthesizes the key findings and their implications for race-based labor theories.
Introduction
This paper reviews statistics across three occupational fields — accounting, waiter/waitressing, and commercial painting — using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Drawing on the 1990 census report on occupations by race and gender, the paper determines the percentage of workers in the accounting field who identified as White American, African American, American Indian, Asian American, and Hispanic American, and also examines the gender division within that career field. These numbers are then compared and contrasted with two other occupational categories: waiter/waitressing, representing the service sector, and commercial painting, representing operators, fabricators, and laborers. The findings are further analyzed in light of articles on race and ethnicity by Kirschenman and Neckerman, Newman and Ellis, and Kandel and Parrado.
Statistical Profile of Accountants
According to the U.S. Census Bureau's 1990 census report detailing occupations by race and gender, there are significant differences in involvement in the accounting industry by ethnicity; however, gender was more evenly distributed. The report indicates that 751,840 (approximately 47%) males and 838,338 (approximately 53%) females were employed in the accounting field. Of these 1,590,178 workers, 86% reported being White. Only 6.7% of those in the accounting field reported being African American, 0.3% reported being American Indian, 5.4% reported being Asian American, and 4.2% reported being of Hispanic American ethnicity. These findings differ significantly from those found in the waiter/waitressing and commercial painting fields.
Comparing Waitstaff and Painters to Accounting Demographics
In the field of waiter/waitressing, the total number of employees was roughly comparable to that of accountants. In 1990, the U.S. Census Bureau reported 1,488,253 waiters and waitresses. However, the gender distribution across this occupation differs significantly from that of accounting. Where accountants were fairly evenly divided between men and women, waiting tables was clearly skewed toward female employees — 80% of waiters and waitresses were female, according to the Census Bureau's report. Racially, the percentages were more closely aligned with those found in accounting.
Eighty-eight percent of those in the waiter/waitressing field reported being White, compared to 86% of accountants. Just over 5.4% of waiters/waitresses identified as African American, compared to 6.7% of accountants. Seven-tenths of a percent of waiters/waitresses reported American Indian ethnicity, 4.3% reported being Asian American, and 7.9% reported being Hispanic American. These figures compare to 0.3%, 5.4%, and 4.2% of accountants reporting American Indian, Asian American, and Hispanic American identities, respectively. These ethnic breakdowns are remarkably similar to those found in the accounting field and continue to appear in the commercial painting sector — though, again, there is a significant difference in the gender breakdown when compared to the previous two occupations.
The U.S. Census Bureau's data on the painting field reveals dramatic differences in the proportion of males versus females. Unlike waiter/waitressing, this occupation is skewed heavily in favor of male workers: 85% of painters are male, roughly the inverse of the female proportion among waitresses. Yet the ethnic breakdowns remain quite similar to those of the accounting and waiter/waitressing fields.
Nearly 78% of painters reported being White American — somewhat lower than the 86% and 88% figures for accountants and waiters/waitresses, respectively. Other ethnic breakdowns for painters included: 11% African American, 0.7% American Indian, 1.7% Asian American, and 17.3% Hispanic American. The two most notable differences from the other two fields were the lower incidence of Asian American painters (roughly one-third the rate found among accountants or waitstaff) and the substantially higher incidence of Hispanic American painters (more than three times the rate found in the other two occupations).
Conclusion
There were notable gender differences across the three occupational fields examined. Where accountants were nearly evenly divided between men and women, waiters/waitresses were heavily skewed female and painters were heavily skewed male. However, only modest differences appeared in the racial and ethnic breakdowns for these three occupations. Although painters showed a higher prevalence of Hispanic Americans and a lower prevalence of Asian Americans, most of the racial and ethnic statistics were broadly similar across all three fields. These findings appear to run contrary to what the scholarly literature might predict — that there would be a significantly higher incidence of minority workers in the lower-skilled, lower-education occupations, driven by employer stereotyping, educational disparities, and increases in minority populations. The 1990 Census data, at least across these three fields, do not strongly support that expectation.
Works Cited
Kandel, W. and Parrado, E. "Hispanics in the American South and the Transformation of the Poultry Industry." Rethinking the Color Line: Readings in Race and Ethnicity. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
Kirschenman, J. and Neckerman, K. "We'd Love to Hire Them, But…" Rethinking the Color Line: Readings in Race and Ethnicity. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
Newman, K. and Ellis, C. "There's No Shame in My Game." Rethinking the Color Line: Readings in Race and Ethnicity. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.