This paper examines the key types of retirement savings accounts—the traditional IRA, Roth IRA, and employer-sponsored 401K—and outlines a long-term investment portfolio strategy designed to reach a future value of $1.1 million by age 72. Starting from a present value of $488,000, the paper recommends a traditional IRA given the client's assumed need to minimize current tax burden. An aggressive, all-equity asset allocation of 50% large cap, 30% small cap, and 20% foreign stocks is proposed, justified by a 50-year investment horizon and moderate risk tolerance. The paper also addresses return assumptions, inflation adjustments, and a contingency plan for transitioning to lower-risk securities as retirement approaches.
The paper demonstrates applied financial reasoning under uncertainty: it explicitly states what information is unknown (current age, employer plan availability, risk tolerance details) and then proceeds to make defensible assumptions, justifying each one. This transparent assumption-setting is a hallmark of professional financial planning writing and shows strong analytical discipline.
The paper opens with a survey of retirement account types, transitions to the specific client scenario and account selection, then moves into asset allocation rationale and quantitative return projections. It closes with a contingency plan addressing portfolio rebalancing as retirement approaches. This logical progression—from general knowledge to specific recommendation to risk management—mirrors a real financial planning memo structure.
There are a number of different types of retirement accounts, each with distinct tax characteristics, so it is important to understand what each of them offers. The first type is the Individual Retirement Arrangement (IRA), a tax-deferred plan that can be set up with any number of financial institutions. Under the traditional IRA, gains from investments are not taxed when they are realized within the plan. Instead, they are taxed as income when withdrawn in retirement (IRS.gov, 2013). Other features of a traditional IRA include the ability to open one even if you already participate in another type of retirement plan, and in most cases, contributions are tax deductible.
A Roth IRA is similar, but with some important differences. Contributions to a Roth IRA are not tax deductible (IRS.gov, 2013, 2). However, when funds are withdrawn in retirement, neither the principal nor the investment earnings are taxed. This makes the Roth IRA a tax-exempt savings vehicle rather than a tax-deferred one (Wolpe, 2013).
While IRAs are individual plans, a 401K plan is sponsored by an employer. Under this arrangement, a portion of the employee's paycheck is deferred into the plan on a pre-tax basis, and taxes are only paid when the money is withdrawn in retirement (WSJ, 2013). The key benefit of deferred taxation — as with a traditional IRA — rests on the assumption that the account holder's tax rate in retirement will be lower than during their working years.
Without knowing whether the client has an employer that offers a 401K plan, it will be assumed for this analysis that no such plan is available. This leaves a choice between a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA. The traditional IRA is tax-deferred, which has the benefit of lowering the client's tax burden throughout their working life. The Roth IRA is tax-exempt, meaning contributions are made with after-tax dollars.
The more desirable plan in this scenario is the traditional IRA. It is assumed that the client needs to minimize their tax burden during their working years, either to help finance daily living expenses or because the client holds a well-paying job with a high marginal tax rate. Under either circumstance, the immediate tax deduction provided by a traditional IRA is the more advantageous choice.
The goal of the portfolio is to reach a future value of $1.1 million by the age of 72. The current age of the client is not known. The present-day value of the portfolio is $488,000. Four asset classes are to be included: bonds, large cap stocks, small cap stocks, and foreign stocks. The expected or historical returns for these instruments are not specified, nor is the precise risk tolerance of the account holder. For this analysis, it is assumed that the client is a young person with moderate risk tolerance and a 50-year investment horizon, with no additional information provided about initial contributions or ongoing deposit amounts.
For this client, asset allocation can be relatively aggressive given their long investment horizon. Even with moderate risk aversion, a young investor with 50 years until retirement is unlikely to be forced to liquidate holdings at a loss due to a short-term market downturn. At this stage, there is no compelling need to include bonds in the portfolio. Interest rates are currently very low, meaning even long-term corporate bonds offer limited yield. To achieve a reasonable return on corporate debt, one must sacrifice credit quality, at which point it makes more sense to hold higher-quality equities instead.
You’re 51% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.