The Return of Martin Guerre: Davis's Historical Method
This paper examines Natalie Zemon Davis's The Return of Martin Guerre as a work of historical analysis that reconstructs the lives of 16th-century French peasants through court testimony, legal documents, and reasoned speculation. The paper explores Davis's central argument that peasant and women's lives were far more complex and empowered than traditional historiography suggests. It analyzes her methodology—including thought experiments and narrative dramatization—while acknowledging the speculative nature of her conclusions about Bertrande de Rols's motivations, the imposture of Arnaud du Tilh, and the evolving conception of marriage in Reformation-era France.
- Introduction: History as Fairy Tale: Overview of the Martin Guerre story and Davis's approach
- Recovering Peasant Lives and Women's Experience: Davis's argument for complexity in peasant and women's lives
- Davis's Methodology: Speculation and Court Testimony: How Davis handles Bertrande's early marriage and consummation
- Arnaud du Tilh and the Mechanics of Imposture: How Arnaud sustained the imposture and community acceptance
- Bertrande's Calculated Choices and the Inheritance Dispute: Pierre Guerre's challenge and Bertrande's shifting allegiances
- Marriage, Deception, and Happiness: Davis's speculation on love, marriage ideology, and adultery
- Conclusion: The Value of Interpretive History: Assessment of Davis's interpretive method and its merits
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper consistently connects specific textual evidence—direct quotations with footnote citations—to broader claims about Davis's methodology, keeping the analysis grounded in the primary source.
- It balances appreciation of Davis's narrative power with measured critical awareness, noting where her interpretations are speculative and where she herself acknowledges uncertainty.
- The paper situates the historical analysis within its broader intellectual stakes, arguing that Davis's approach challenges conventional historiography by centering non-literate, non-aristocratic subjects.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective source-driven argumentation: each analytical claim is immediately supported by a direct quotation or paraphrase from Davis, followed by the student's own interpretive commentary. This quote-then-analyze pattern—executed consistently across multiple paragraphs—models how to integrate primary sources without letting them substitute for the writer's own argument.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens by framing Davis's book as unusually situated between fact and fairy tale, then moves through a sequence of thematic concerns: the challenge of recovering peasant experience, Davis's use of speculation and thought experiment, the mechanics by which the imposture was sustained, Bertrande's agency amid family and legal pressure, and the role of evolving marriage ideologies. A brief conclusion weighs the merits of Davis's interpretive approach against its admitted limitations. The structure is linear and argument-driven throughout.
Introduction: History as Fairy Tale
Natalie Zemon Davis's The Return of Martin Guerre chronicles a true story, yet this work of historical nonfiction carries the quality of a fairy tale because of its improbable character. The title character is a well-to-do French peasant who apparently disappeared, leaving his wife Bertrande de Rols in a state of legal limbo. In a world in which a woman's marital status was all-important, she was unable to divorce and unable to mourn a man she was uncertain was dead or alive. A man claiming to be Martin Guerre returned and was accepted by "his" wife, but was later revealed to be an impostor—despite being fully accepted by both Bertrande and the surrounding community. In her analysis of this story, Davis skillfully blends court testimony and speculation to flesh out the narrative. In doing so, she makes a contribution to the way historical analysis is usually performed. It is often challenging to "do" history—a method of study that focuses on verbal analysis—when the historical players are not literate. Davis attempts to argue that the stories of people such as Bertrande are equally important as those of the aristocracy.
Recovering Peasant Lives and Women's Experience
Davis's work is so distinctive because she makes an important claim: the lives of peasants and women in 16th-century France are far more complex and empowered than previous accounts might suggest. She believes that a failure to understand Bertrande's motivation originates in the emphasis placed on supposedly objective, written accounts by previous historians. Of course, merely because something was written in the past does not necessarily mean it is accurate or factual. As Davis writes, "Historians have been learning more and more about rural families from marriage contracts and testaments, from parish records of births and deaths, and from accounts of courtship… But we still know little about the peasants' hopes and feelings."1 In a case such as that of Martin Guerre, understanding feelings and motivations is critical. Peasants often appear as the subjects of comedies, yet the actual court transcripts Davis uses suggest a very different story—one filled with bad marriages, violated contracts, and other common sources of strife, just as with higher-born individuals. The central question with which Davis grapples is how to make peasants' lives come to life with dignity.
Bibliography
Davis, Natalie Zemon. The Return of Martin Guerre. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.