Roman, Greek, and Babylonian Mythology Compared
This essay compares Roman, Greek, and Babylonian mythology through an anthropological lens, arguing that all three traditions share fundamental similarities at the macro level while differing in specific details. Drawing on Christopher Hitchens, Leonard William King, and Simone Payment, the paper explores how mythology functions as early humanity's attempt to explain the physical universe. It examines how oral tradition shaped all three mythologies, how societal structures influenced religious development, and contrasts specific deities—particularly the Greek Poseidon and the Babylonian Ea—to illustrate the distinction between surface-level differences and deeper structural commonalities.
- Introduction: Religion as Pattern-Seeking: Hitchens quote frames religion as early philosophy
- Mythology and the Structure of Society: Oral tradition shaped Babylonian and Greco-Roman myths
- The Shift from Polytheism to Monotheism: Roman autocracy may have seeded monotheistic religions
- Macro-Level Similarities Across Mythologies: All three mythologies share explanatory and oral roots
- Comparing Poseidon and Ea: Greek sea god versus Babylonian water deity contrasted
- The Purpose Behind the Myths: Micro-differences trivial; myths explain the unexplainable
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay grounds its comparative argument in a clear theoretical framework — the Hitchens quotation establishes a consistent lens (religion as early philosophy) that the paper returns to in its conclusion, giving the argument structural cohesion.
- The direct comparison of two specific deities, Poseidon and Ea, anchors the abstract macro/micro distinction in concrete evidence, making the argument accessible and persuasive.
- The paper maintains an honest, self-aware tone, openly acknowledging that the micro-level differences between mythologies are "relatively inconsequential" in the broader context, which strengthens rather than undermines the thesis.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses a macro-to-micro analytical structure: it first establishes broad similarities across all three mythologies, then narrows to a specific deity comparison to test and illustrate that framework. This move — from general principle to specific case — is a reliable technique for comparative essays in anthropology and religious studies.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a theoretical provocation (the Hitchens quotation), builds its core argument about structural similarity, introduces a sociological digression on how Roman autocracy may have seeded monotheism, then pivots to a focused deity comparison before returning to the thesis in the conclusion. The Works Cited page follows MLA formatting conventions.
Introduction: Religion as Pattern-Seeking
In his book The Portable Atheist: Essential Readings for the Non-Believer, Christopher Hitchens makes the following observation: "By all means let us agree that we are pattern-seeking mammals and that, owing to our restless intelligence and inquisitiveness, we will still prefer a conspiracy theory to no explanation at all. Religion was our first attempt at philosophy, just as alchemy was our first attempt at chemistry and astrology our first attempt to make sense of the movements of the heavens" (12).
It should come as no surprise, then, that when one juxtaposes different religions and mythologies within the objective framework of science, anthropology, or sociology, certain fundamental commonalities emerge. Because humans are innately similar — pattern-seeking, restlessly intelligent — we have throughout our history created religions and mythologies, or more crudely put, "conspiracy theories," that are also innately similar in their scope and breadth. Roman and Greek mythology are, at the macro level, no different from Babylonian mythology. The differences between these traditions lie only in their respective literal details — that is, which gods are responsible for which phenomena or aspects of physical reality.
Works Cited
Hitchens, Christopher. The Portable Atheist: Essential Readings for the Non-Believer. New York: Da Capo Press, 2007. Print.
King, Leonard W. Babylonian Religion and Mythology. New York: Nabu Press, 2010. Print.
Payment, Simone. Greek Mythology (Mythology Around the World). New York: Rosen Publishing Group, 2006. Print.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.