This essay examines the interconnected themes of love, social class, and personal independence in E.M. Forster's A Room with a View, arguing that Lucy Honeychurch's marriage to George Emerson represents a profound awakening of her soul. Through her transformative experiences in Italy—meeting George Emerson, witnessing passionate displays of affection, and ultimately rejecting the constraints of her upper-class engagement—Lucy learns to transcend the social boundaries that have confined her, assert her own agency, and embrace romantic passion. The paper traces how these three dimensions of her growth are mutually reinforcing, culminating in her ability to live authentically on her own terms rather than according to social convention.
E.M. Forster's A Room with a View addresses several interconnected themes central to modernist literature and social critique. The novel illustrates the rigid class system of Edwardian England, in which money and social graces were the chief distinguishing points between those who have and those who have not. Forster also explores the necessity for independence, particularly the independence of women—a concept embodied in the fate of the novel's protagonist, Lucy Honeychurch. Love, in all its manifestations—physical, spiritual, and mental—permeates the work. Forster's true talent lies in his ability to combine all of these themes with Lucy's ultimate trajectory. A careful analysis reveals that Lucy's marriage to George Emerson symbolizes a true awakening of her soul because she is able to consummate love, transcend social boundaries, and assert her own independence in this "rare literary document" (Fillion 266).
Although Lucy eventually marries in her native England, she becomes acutely aware of the repression that has characterized her life on all three fronts—love, independence, and social boundaries—through her transformative trip to Italy. Through various experiences in Italy, Lucy acts on the latent stirrings in her soul and truly frees it so that she can live a life full of passion, one not constructed by social norms. The fact that a character must escape from restrictive England to find love is a recurring motif in Forster's work, as evidenced by the fate of Lilia in Where Angels Fear to Tread. Experiences such as meeting Mr. Emerson, witnessing a man's murder, and watching a pair of lovers kiss passionately all produce a profound impact on Lucy, leading her to recognize that her life has been merely a series of encounters with the same "circle of rich, pleasant people, with identical interests and identical foes" (Forster).
By interacting with those outside this circle in Italy, Lucy realizes that the social limitations shaping her entire life were merely restrictions that, once transcended, could lead to a more fulfilling existence. These social limitations reflect a broader conflict between citizenship and capitalism (Marshall and Bottomore 38). Upon meeting people outside her upper-class English tourist set, Lucy recognizes that "social barriers were irremoveable, doubtless, but not particularly high. You jump over them. . . . Italy was offering her the most priceless of all possessions—her own soul" (Forster). This passage is critical: it demonstrates that once Lucy transcends the conventional social boundaries she has encountered throughout her life by going to Italy, she gains a degree of autonomy in her soul and the vivacity that enables people to feel the extremity of life and revel in its glory. Pushing past social barriers helps Lucy free her soul.
A pivotal means by which Lucy gains control over her own soul and lives a full and rich life is through falling in love. Forster, a known homosexual, brings considerable sensitivity to his portrayal of this aspect of Lucy's emotional development (Furbank 3). As the preceding discussion indicates, Lucy's ability to love, transgress social distinctions, and assert her freedom are far from mutually exclusive. On the contrary, an innate connection exists between these three facets of her Italian experience and their ramifications for the realization of her soul. Lucy comes to know the emotions associated with love through her many encounters with George Emerson. Emerson is the one who first teaches her to feel the joy of passion in a romantic sense—operating as one of the "emotional centers" (Sullivan 217) of the novel—when he kisses her.
The following passage vividly illustrates this moment:
He saw radiant joy in her face, he saw the flowers beat against her dress in blue waves. The bushes above them closed. He stepped quickly forward and kissed her. Before she could speak, almost before she could feel, a voice called, "Lucy!" . . . The silence of life had been broken by Miss Bartlett, who stood brown against the view. (Forster)
This passage demonstrates the sort of awakening Lucy experiences in Italy, which stimulates her soul. The connotations of love are apparent—the "joy" in Lucy's face and the impetuousness of the young man's kiss suggest a headstrong passion Lucy had never previously felt. Yet it is equally significant that Lucy simultaneously encounters the limitations of social distinctions and independence in this very passage. While she and George are immersed in radiant blue, she cannot enjoy the kiss for long because her cousin Charlotte has witnessed it and calls Lucy away from her desire. This is not merely a transgression against Lucy's personal liberty; it also alludes to the restrictions of social conventions, under which young women rarely kissed men, especially those considered commoners. Nevertheless, this passage illustrates the type of love that will stir Lucy's soul awake, as demonstrated by the novel's ending in which Lucy and George are on their knees, "in an attitude of worship" (Regis 99).
Perhaps the ultimate way Lucy highlights her newfound independence is through her termination of her marriage proposal with Mr. Vyse. This sort of independence parallels that asserted by other literary heroines who reject restrictive engagements. In several ways—including the spelling of his name, which is a variation on the word "vice," connoting both bad habit and the stubborn restrictions of a device that grips hard—Mr. Vyse represents the reserved, upper-class social conventions that have continually repressed Lucy's freedom. Now that she is engaged to him after returning from Italy, Vyse would be able to literally repress Lucy by legally controlling her. The fact that Lucy breaks her engagement attests to the independence necessary for one who is able to fully and deeply live.
The manner in which she breaks the engagement—abrupt and convincing—indicates how she now relishes her new independence. In a brief moment, "The scales fell from Lucy's eyes. How had she stood Cecil for a moment? He was absolutely intolerable, and the same evening she broke off her engagement" (Forster). Notably, Lucy's decision to break the engagement stems from Cecil's refusal to play tennis with her friends, an event that alludes to the spontaneity and immediate assertion of Lucy's will—proof that she now enjoys a sense of liberty. The author's diction is equally important: Lucy not only wants to liberate herself from Vyse's controlling influence but actually dislikes him for restricting her, which is why she suddenly finds him "intolerable." Her ability to exercise independence is directly attributed to her Italian experience. It enables her to liberate her soul and act as she wishes to act, not as others dictate, allowing her to form her own identity fully and live life on her own terms with the "passionate awakenings" (Wagner 275) she eventually shares with George.
Although much of what Lucy learns about love and its intoxicating effect comes from her interactions with George, she learns about authentic passion from other sources as well. Part of her desire for George spawns from witnessing lovers expressing their feelings while in Italy. On one occasion, Lucy is accompanied by Mr. Eager and Mr. Emerson on a carriage drive. The driver is accompanied by his lover and makes quite a display of kissing and physically expressing affection while driving. Significantly, Mr. Emerson defends the young couple while Mr. Eager disparages them for their public affection. After the latter successfully separates the pair and claims victory, Mr. Emerson tells him: "It is not victory. . . . It is defeat. You have parted two people who were happy" (Forster).
This incident and Mr. Emerson's words produce a profound effect on Lucy. She witnesses two people heedless of social conventions who effectively prioritize love above them—exactly what Lucy will eventually do with George. The diction Mr. Emerson employs is crucial: he describes the couple as "happy"; they are happy because they are with one another and in love. Happiness is an expression of the soul. In this incident, Lucy sees not only people in love but also what love does for them—it makes them happy and allows them to express their souls together. This passage helps provide Lucy with a model for her own feelings and need to consummate love, which in turn stimulates her soul.
"Marriage to George synthesizes love, independence, and transcendence"
You’re 88% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.