This paper examines the role of critical self-reflection in developing a personal education platform and shaping effective educational leadership. Drawing on Kotter's advanced change theory, it argues that authentic leadership begins with an inward process of examining one's biases, assumptions, beliefs, and stereotypes before initiating external change. The paper also reflects on how enrollment in a leadership course shifted the author's understanding of leadership from an external event to an intimate expression of personality, influencing others through broadened paradigms and greater awareness of diverse ways of thinking.
The development of a personal education platform demands critical self-reflection so that prospective educational leaders can come to understand themselves. It entails educational leaders grasping their unvarnished, genuine, and authentic self. This introspective process guides educational leaders by engaging them in self-interrogation. Critical self-reflection guides educational leaders along a path of liberation — for themselves and for others. Educational leaders begin by liberating themselves and pursuing emancipation, understanding, and clarity.
Self-reflection is an inwardly coordinated process shaped by various external forces. It is marked by changes in thinking. Therefore, the change an individual wants to achieve must first be formulated within the mind. After leaders reflect deeply on their biases, assumptions, beliefs, feelings, and stereotypes, they can see themselves and their perspectives with greater clarity. Self-reflection enables leaders to question the sources of their beliefs, examine how their thoughts and beliefs influence their curriculum, and identify what they need to change in order to adequately meet the needs of students. The concept of critical self-reflection is supported by the advanced change theory (Kotter, 2009).
Critical self-reflection is part of an organizational change process that leaders use to make internal changes before initiating external ones. In this sense, critical self-reflection entails the following:
I. Prioritizing the common good before self-interest.
II. Examining one's sources of internal resistance, thereby limiting self-deception and personal hypocrisy.
Through self-reflection, educational leaders become enlightened about political realities, develop a strategy and direction, and gain insight into systemic inequality. Self-reflection also cultivates the ability to engage in deconstructive interpretation as leaders further their personal education (Kotter, 2009).
Since enrolling in this course, my leadership influence has changed dramatically. While others once viewed leadership as an external event, I have come to understand — and to help others recognize — that it is an intimate expression of one's personality. This course has deepened my influence by encouraging me to reflect on how my actions represent who I am. Rather than simply brainstorming what actions to take in a given situation, I have learned to think broadly. I have also worked to influence those around me to develop a wider view of the world, particularly regarding the impact of the messages they send to others.
This course also changed my perspective on paradigms. As a result, I have been able to extend this influence to others as well. Paradigms have helped me understand diverse views of reality. As mental models, paradigms have made significant contributions to structuring my own thinking and guiding how others think. This kind of influence helps people make sense of the information they encounter — shaping where they direct their attention, how they interpret things, and how they draw conclusions (Kotter, 2009).
"Paradigms, assumptions, and conflict in leadership"
You’re 73% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.