This paper presents an argumentative analysis comparing Washington Irving's 1820 short story "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" with Tim Burton's 1999 film adaptation of the same name. The paper examines the key differences in setting, characters, and plot between the two works, then explores how the values endorsed or critiqued shift from one version to the other β moving from themes of social privilege and romantic rivalry in Irving's text to themes of scientific rationalism and greed in Burton's film. The paper also considers what Burton's adaptation reveals about contemporary concerns, including the limits of modern forensic science and the corrupting influence of wealth and inheritance.
When most people think of The Legend of Sleepy Hollow, they often associate it with the popular film directed by Tim Burton. While this association is understandable, the film is in fact a loose adaptation of the 1820 story published by Washington Irving. The film follows the general events and characters depicted in Irving's original work, but departs from it in significant ways. To fully understand the differences between the two requires a careful comparison. This analysis examines the most important differences between them, explores how the values endorsed or critiqued have shifted from one version to the next, and considers what Burton's film reveals about issues of concern in contemporary society.
There are several differences between the novel and the film, including the setting, the characters, and the ending. In Irving's story, the tale takes place in 1790 at a Dutch settlement known as Tarry Town. The main character, Ichabod Crane, is a schoolmaster from Connecticut who competes with Abraham "Brom Bones" Van Brunt for the love of an eighteen-year-old named Katrina Van Tassel, the daughter of a wealthy landowner named Baltus Van Tassel.
As Crane is leaving a party one evening, he is pursued by a headless horseman β the ghost of a Hessian mercenary who lost his head during the American Revolution. The horseman is said to ride back and forth across the scenes of battle in search of the head he lost. Shortly after this encounter, Ichabod mysteriously disappears from the town, leaving Brom Bones free to pursue and marry Katrina. The novel ends with the nature of the headless horseman left unresolved. Although open to interpretation, many readers believe that Brom Bones was the horseman himself, having assumed the disguise with the intention of driving Ichabod Crane away so that he could pursue Katrina without interference (Irving).
In the film version, the plot is set in 1799 in Sleepy Hollow, New York. Ichabod Crane is a New York City police detective sent to the area to investigate a series of brutal murders that have left victims decapitated, their heads missing. Arriving with cutting-edge scientific techniques such as fingerprinting and autopsies, Crane is told that the perpetrator is not human but rather a supernatural spirit riding from beyond the grave in search of his lost skull.
Crane is assisted in his investigation by a young boy named Masbeth, the orphaned son of one of the horseman's victims. Meanwhile, Crane is staying in the home of the town's wealthiest family, the Van Tassels, where he quickly begins a romantic relationship with their daughter Katrina. He eventually discovers the grave of the headless horseman and learns that the spirit is seeking revenge over land rights β revenge directed at actions taken by Katrina's mother. Crane locates the horseman's skull and returns it to the grave, allowing the spirit to feel that his revenge has been achieved. The horseman and his enslaver then return to the underworld, and Crane departs for New York City with Katrina and Masbeth ("The Legend of Sleepy Hollow"). This comparison is significant because it illustrates how the characters, setting, and plot differ considerably between the two works.
The values at the heart of each work shift dramatically between the film and the novel. In the movie, Burton reframes the story by presenting Crane as someone determined to prove that modern forensics can solve a wide variety of crimes. Yet he finds that certain elements lie beyond the reach of science. The murders are ultimately rooted in mysticism, revenge, and the greed of wealthy landowners β forces that his tools cannot fully explain or resolve. Crane is therefore led to seek the root causes of the problem through other means, eventually solving the case not through forensic analysis but by returning the horseman's skull to his grave. This highlights the film's central value claim: that modern science, while useful, cannot account for every mystery ("The Legend of Sleepy Hollow").
In Irving's novel, by contrast, the emphasis falls on love, loyalty, and the social order. Crane, a schoolteacher, wins the affections of Katrina β something that Brom Bones cannot tolerate. The headless horseman then appears, and Crane vanishes, leaving Brom Bones free to court Katrina aggressively. In this sense, the novel suggests that no matter how good one's intentions may be, interfering with the established social structure of a community carries consequences. Crane, as an outsider, is ultimately driven away. The book therefore places greater emphasis on affluence and privilege within society, while the film focuses on the limits of rational science in the face of forces that defy explanation. The values shift from one version to the other based on how the story is told and on what ideals the narrative holds most important for its central character ("The Legend of Sleepy Hollow"; "Sleepy Hollow").
"Connects film themes to modern greed and science"
A second issue of concern is the role of modern science in improving our understanding of the world. Throughout the film, Crane attempts to demonstrate that contemporary forensic methods can solve the murders. After working through a series of events, he comes to understand why the headless horseman is acting as he is. In this respect, forensic science gives Crane insight into the situation beyond what superstition alone could provide. Yet ultimately, the only way to resolve the murders is to return the horseman's skull to his grave β an act that has nothing to do with science. These elements together suggest that modern science can illuminate the underlying causes of complex problems, but it is not a complete solution. There are aspects of human experience that science cannot fully explain and that will continue to influence outcomes. The film therefore argues for a balance between rational inquiry and an openness to that which remains unknown ("Sleepy Hollow").
The similarities between the two works lie in their shared premise: both feature an outsider named Ichabod Crane, a woman named Katrina, and a frightening encounter with the headless horseman. In Irving's novel, the story is ultimately a reflection of the power and influence of the aristocracy in society. In Burton's film, the focus shifts to greed as a reflection of contemporary thinking, alongside an exploration of how modern science is used β and limited β in making sense of the world around us. These elements are important because they illustrate how both works are products of their own time, shaped by the social concerns and values that were most pressing when each was created.
The Legend of Sleepy Hollow. IMDB, 1999. Web. 15 Aug. 2011. <http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0214874/>
The Legend of Sleepy Hollow. Soh Stream, 1999. Web. 15 Aug. 2011. <
Sleepy Hollow. Imaginary Cinema, 1999. Web. 15 Aug. 2011. <http://imaginarycinema.com/sleepy.html>
Sleepy Hollow. Tim Burton Collection, 1999. Web. 15 Aug. 2011. <
Irving, Washington. The Legend of Sleepy Hollow. Gutenberg, 1820. Web. 15 Aug. 2011. <
MLA Format. Purdue OWL.
You’re 89% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.