This paper presents a case study of a small dress-designing and embroidery business established in 2011 by a woman entrepreneur in Lahore, Pakistan. Drawing on an interview with the business owner, the paper examines her practices against established small business theory. It identifies effective strategies — including efficient use of limited resources, customer satisfaction practices, and competitive pricing — as well as significant weaknesses such as inadequate advertising, the absence of product samples, and the lack of a formal business plan. The paper concludes with recommendations for improving the business's long-term prospects.
The owner of a small business today is troubled by many problems and encountered by many opportunities on a daily basis. When running a company — no matter how big or small — one needs the ability to look outside the business for solutions to problems, for better ideas, and for best practices that support growth, expansion, and success. Nonetheless, ideas drawn from textbooks or established best practices should be studied carefully and critically before being applied to one's own business (Zahorsky, 2013).
This paper is based on an interview conducted with a 38-year-old woman who started her own small business in 2011. She lives in Lahore, Pakistan, and designs and produces ladies' dresses on order. Given the regional trend of wearing clothing with heavy embroidery, she has been able to earn a reasonable profit. While it cannot be said that her business is flourishing, it is progressing at a steady pace. Since the business is still relatively young, it is too early to declare it either a total success or a total failure. She has set up a small workshop in her home, where she supervises workers in designing and stitching clothes. This paper analyzes the good and bad practices she has adopted and evaluates them against established small business theory.
Defining a small business is a difficult and often controversial task. A variety of firm types fall under this term, and many writers have explained how these firms operate. Some have defined a small business as one that is independently owned and operated and that does not dominate its field of operation (D'Amboise & Muldowney, 1988). Other researchers have used specific criteria to operationalize the concept, including value of assets, value added, annual sales, and number of employees. In practice, however, the category is most commonly delimited by the number of employees and annual sales volume. According to standard definitions, a small business should have annual sales of no more than $20 million and no more than 500 employees.
By this definition, the boutique operated by this entrepreneur qualifies as a small business. It cannot be considered a micro-business — even though the number of people employed is very small — because a micro-business is typically owned and operated by a single person. Without her hired workers, this business would not function. Therefore, the theories and practices of small business management are applicable to this case.
A primary strategy for making a small business work is ensuring that resources are used where they will be best utilized and will produce maximum return (Attolini, 2012). Precision is critical in a small business context, where margins for error are slim and there is little room to absorb losses on invested resources. Since this entrepreneur started the business under financial pressure, she made the practical decision to set up her workshop inside her own home. Rather than constructing or renting a separate space, she converted her drawing room into a workshop. This saved considerable resources: she avoided rental costs and eliminated the daily travel time and fuel expenses that a separate location would have required. The financial savings were then redirected toward purchasing the latest embroidery machines — a clear example of making the best use of limited resources.
Customer satisfaction has consistently been identified as a key driver of success in both small and large businesses (Kuah, 2002). This entrepreneur demonstrated sound judgment by initially limiting the number of orders she accepted, allowing her to build a reputation for quality. She also introduced a mid-process check-in: when a dress was halfway complete, she would invite the customer to review the embroidery and request any changes before the work continued. This approach fostered trust and encouraged repeat business — an important asset for any small firm building its client base.
She also adopted a sensible pricing strategy. From the outset, she kept her profit margins modest while refusing to compromise on quality. She identified retail markets within the city where she could source materials — threads, beads, and sequins — at competitive prices, passing the savings on to her customers. This combination of quality and affordability gave her a meaningful edge in a competitive local market.
"Advertising gaps, missing samples, no business plan"
Even though it has not been long since the beginning of this business, we can still form an impression of the good and bad practices adopted by this entrepreneur. Her strengths — efficient use of limited resources, a customer-first approach, and competitive pricing — represent a solid foundation. These practices should be maintained and developed into formal best practices. At the same time, the weaknesses identified — limited advertising, the absence of product samples, and the lack of a business plan — need to be addressed directly if the business is to grow and sustain itself in the long term. In addition, the owner should keep a close eye on her competitors in the market (Johnson, 2013) to ensure she continues to offer a compelling and differentiated service.
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.