This paper applies the Social-Ecological Model (SEM) to understand and prevent suicide, with a specific focus on African American populations. Beginning with an overview of SEM's four levels—individual, relationship, community, and societal—the paper examines how intrapersonal factors (such as hopelessness, anxiety, and impulsivity) and interpersonal factors (such as intimate partner violence and familial conflict) interact to elevate suicide risk. It then addresses institutional, community, and societal influences, including structural racism, segregation, and socioeconomic inequality. The paper concludes by identifying key challenges to achieving health equity and illustrating SEM's practical application through a "No to Suicide" campaign case study.
The paper exemplifies framework application: it introduces a well-established theoretical model, then methodically moves through each component of that model, populating it with specific evidence and prevention strategies. This scaffold-then-populate approach is a strong technique for health sciences and social science writing because it keeps complex, multilevel arguments organized and easy to follow.
The paper opens with a standalone explanation of SEM and its four concentric levels. It then narrows to suicide among African Americans, first analyzing intra- and interpersonal risk factors, then scaling outward to institutional and societal forces. A dedicated section on barriers to health equity (structural racism, segregation, and income inequality) deepens the societal analysis. The paper closes by looping all four SEM levels back through a brief campaign case study, giving the argument a satisfying applied conclusion before the reference list.
The Social-Ecological Model (SEM) examines the comprehensive interplay among individual, relationship, community, and societal factors. It provides a framework for understanding the multiple factors that either expose people to violence or protect them from perpetrating or experiencing it. Overlapping rings are used in the model to demonstrate how factors at one level influence factors at other levels (CDC, 2016). The model also suggests that acting across several levels simultaneously is the most effective approach to preventing violence, as this has a greater chance of sustaining prevention efforts over time and achieving population-level impact.
At the individual level, the model identifies personal and biological history factors that increase the likelihood of becoming a perpetrator or a victim of violence. Relevant factors include income, history of abuse, substance use, age, and education. Prevention strategies at this level aim to shape the attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs that inhibit violence, and may include life skills training, safe dating and healthy relationship programs, social-emotional learning, and conflict resolution skills.
The relationship level evaluates close relationships that can heighten the risk of violence, whether as a perpetrator or a victim. Family members, close peers, and intimate partners all contribute to an individual's experience and influence their behavior. Prevention strategies at this level include family-centered or parenting initiatives and peer mentoring programs designed to promote parent-child communication, strengthen healthy relationships, enhance problem-solving skills, and reinforce positive peer norms.
The community level explores settings such as workplaces, neighborhoods, and schools where social relationships occur. The model seeks to identify characteristics of these contexts that are linked to violence perpetration or victimization (CDC, 2016). Prevention strategies here include improving the social and physical environments in these settings and addressing factors that contribute to violence within the community—such as high concentrations of alcohol outlets, poverty, instability, and residential segregation.
Finally, the societal level considers broader factors that create an environment either conducive to or protective against violence. These include cultural and social norms that endorse violence as a means of conflict resolution, as well as social, educational, health, and economic policies that maintain disparities between groups (CDC, 2016). Prevention strategies at this level focus on promoting norms that condemn violence and advancing education, employment opportunities, and household financial security.
Suicide is a significant public health concern in the United States. In 2018, approximately fifty thousand people died by suicide, and since 1999 there has been a continuous annual rise in suicidal cases, particularly among African Americans (King & Merchant, 2008). Both intrapersonal and interpersonal factors can influence suicide risk in this population (Rosario-Williams et al., 2022). Intrapersonal factors refer to events that originate from within the individual, such as loneliness and self-reported depressive symptoms. Interpersonal factors, by contrast, involve events influenced by others, such as familial conflict or bullying.
The interpersonal level is consistent with the interpersonal theory of suicide, which proposes that interpersonal factors—such as perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belonging—interact with other elements like hopelessness to heighten suicidal desire. Interpersonal conflict with family members, spouses, or peers increases the likelihood of a suicide attempt. Intrapersonal factors such as negative mood and maladaptive cognitions also contribute to suicide risk when combined with interpersonal stressors (Rosario-Williams et al., 2022). A systematic review further indicates that intrapersonal factors including hostility, impulsivity, anxiety, and aggression are predictors of suicide attempts.
Research findings indicate that intrapersonal and interpersonal factors—including hopelessness, intimate partner violence, feelings of worthlessness, and sadness—are associated with suicide attempts among African Americans (Rosario-Williams et al., 2022). National data show that anxiety and mood disorders substantially predict the likelihood of planning and attempting suicide in this population. Community-based findings suggest that hopelessness is linked to more lethal suicide attempts among African Americans, while hope functions as a protective factor against suicidal ideation among African American college students and against suicide attempts in the context of intimate partner violence (Rosario-Williams et al., 2022). Although both intrapersonal and interpersonal factors are associated with suicide attempts among African Americans, intrapersonal factors appear to have the stronger connection.
At the institutional level, organizations such as the International Association for Suicide Prevention and the WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention provide educational interventions for individuals considered at risk of suicidal behavior (Carter et al., 2021). These individuals are educated and encouraged to seek therapeutic support for their psychological challenges.
At the community level, settings such as workplaces, schools, and neighborhoods can shape an individual's suicide risk. Collaborative community partnerships can be formed to share resources and information about suicide prevention, including how to access therapeutic interventions (King & Merchant, 2008). Segregation within workplaces, healthcare facilities, or schools may also contribute to higher rates of suicide, particularly among African Americans; studies have found that segregation is associated with increased suicide rates among African American males.
At the societal level, factors such as inequality between white Americans and African Americans, cultural attitudes toward mental health, and socioeconomic status all contribute to suicide rates, particularly among African Americans (Gee & Ford, 2011). For instance, research by Cheref and colleagues found that income status was associated with suicide attempts among Hispanic and Asian and Pacific Islander individuals, illustrating how socioeconomic position intersects with race in shaping suicide risk.
Carter, S. P., Campbell, S. B., Wee, J. Y., Law, K. C., Lehavot, K., Simpson, T., & Reger, M. A. (2021). Suicide attempts among racial and ethnic groups in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 1–11.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). The social-ecological model: A framework for prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/about/social-ecologicalmodel.html
Gee, G. C., & Ford, C. L. (2011). Structural racism and health inequities: Old issues, new directions. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 8(1), 115–132.
King, C. A., & Merchant, C. R. (2008). Social and interpersonal factors relating to adolescent suicidality: A review of the literature. Archives of Suicide Research, 12(3), 181–196.
Rosario-Williams, B., Rowe-Harriott, S., Ray, M., Jeglic, E., & Miranda, R. (2022). Factors precipitating suicide attempts vary across race. Journal of American College Health, 70(2), 568–574.
Slocum, L. A., Esbensen, F. A., & Taylor, T. J. (2017). The code of silence in schools: An assessment of a socio-ecological model of youth's willingness to report school misbehavior. Youth & Society, 49(2), 123–149.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.