This paper examines Steve Jobs' effectiveness as Apple's CEO through the lens of classical management theory. Drawing on the four functions of management—planning, organizing, leading, and controlling—the paper argues that Jobs' unconventional, top-down leadership style was well suited to Apple's culture of secrecy and product innovation. The analysis also applies Mintzberg's managerial role framework, identifying Jobs' interpersonal, informational, and decisional contributions to the company. Despite criticism of his autocratic tendencies and micromanagement, the paper concludes that Jobs' methods consistently served Apple's strategic goals and produced measurable results.
The paper demonstrates theory-to-case mapping: each management concept from Dumler & Skinner (2004) is introduced briefly and then immediately illustrated with a specific example from Jobs' behavior at Apple. This technique shows evaluators that the student can move fluidly between textbook frameworks and real-world evidence without simply summarizing one or the other.
The paper opens with a counterargument (Taylor's critique) before defending its thesis, establishing intellectual honesty early. The four body sections each address one management function in turn, followed by a section on managerial skills and Mintzberg's roles. A short critical paragraph acknowledges controversy before the conclusion restates the thesis with accumulated evidence. This structure mirrors a standard analytical essay and is well suited for undergraduate business courses.
According to Taylor (2009) of the Harvard Business Review, Steve Jobs "for all of his virtues, clings to the Great Man Theory of Leadership — a CEO-centric model of executive power that is outmoded, unsustainable, and, for most of us mere mortals, ineffective in a world of non-stop change." Taylor may be right. After all, Jobs is renowned for his eccentric yet egocentric leadership style. But whatever Jobs is doing seems to be working. As Kahney (2008) points out, "When Jobs retook the helm in 1997, the company was struggling to survive. Today it has a market cap of $105 billion, placing it ahead of Dell and behind Intel. Its iPod commands 70% of the MP3 player market. Four billion songs have been purchased from iTunes. The iPhone is reshaping the entire wireless industry. Even the underdog Mac operating system has begun to nibble into Windows' once-unassailable dominance; last year, its share of the U.S. market topped 6%, more than double its portion in 2003… It's hard to see how any of this would have happened had Jobs hewed to the standard touchy-feely philosophies of Silicon Valley. Apple creates must-have products the old-fashioned way: by locking the doors and sweating and bleeding until something emerges perfectly formed." It is precisely Jobs' managerial style that enables Apple to succeed.
Jobs meets the four established functions of management: leading, controlling, organizing, and planning. The controlling aspect is what Jobs is most famous for. Control does not just mean watching over company operations like a hawk; the controlling function of management also means that the CEO steers the organization toward its goals and objectives. Without managerial control, a company like Apple would fall apart. A leadership strategy that is too loose might risk unraveling before meeting shareholder expectations.
Jobs is also known for being "a notorious micromanager." No product leaves Cupertino without meeting Jobs' exacting standards, which are said to cover such esoteric details as the number of screws on the bottom of a laptop and the curve of a monitor's corners (Kahney, 2008). Jobs' behavior as CEO fits Dumler and Skinner's (2004) description of managerial control: ensuring that the organization's actual performance conforms to its planned performance objectives. Another way Jobs functions as an effective controller is by closely overseeing the acquisition of new talent at the upper-management level. According to Jobs, "The real issue for me is, Are they going to fall in love with Apple? Because if they fall in love with Apple, everything else will take care of itself. They'll want to do what's best for Apple, not what's best for them, what's best for Steve, or anybody else" (cited in Morris, 2008).
As CEO of Apple, Steve Jobs is also adept at organizing — one of the four functions of management. According to Dumler and Skinner (2004), a manager creates an appropriate organizational structure and defines roles and relationships within the company. Steve Jobs does exactly that by creating a tight hierarchy and enforcing strict controls over employee behavior. As the Workplace Democracy (2010) organization points out, "Apple is known for its top-down, hierarchical structure" in which managerial control is crucial. The way Jobs organizes Apple seems out of step with the rest of Silicon Valley; however, the rigid hierarchy and guarded secrecy with which Apple operates are keys to the company's success.
Kahney (2008) calls Jobs' methods "radical opacity." Employees are sworn to secrecy and hardware and software divisions are kept strictly separate. The departments are segregated so that a company pass will not open doors to other sections of the campus, and cheating is punishable with immediate dismissal. "Signs warning NO TAILGATING are posted on doors to discourage the curious from sneaking into off-limit areas" (Kahney, 2008). Apple's relationship with the press is equally guarded: "dismissive at best, adversarial at worst; Jobs himself speaks only to a handpicked batch of reporters, and only when he deems it necessary" (Kahney, 2008).
Steve Jobs is dedicated to the success of the company he founded, which is why industry experts and employees alike are willing to concede that his sometimes unconventional managerial style happens to be effective for running Apple. In terms of the four functions of management, Jobs is an effective CEO who makes unconventional choices. His novel approach to management is not entirely new — it hearkens back to an older era in which companies were tightly run by upper management and micromanagement over operations was standard. Jobs' ability to plan, organize, lead, and control is, however, unparalleled. These four functions are not discrete or mutually exclusive; they are interrelated. Just as a manager serves interpersonal, informational, and decisional roles simultaneously, a manager also plans, organizes, controls, and leads at the same time.
You’re 44% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.