This paper examines the principal theoretical approaches to strategic human resource management (HRM), with a focus on the universal model and the matching model. It traces the origins of strategic HRM to the shifts in workplace thinking during the 1980s, driven by globalization and increased competition. The paper analyzes how each model functions in practice: the universal model integrates HR policies into a cohesive framework aligned with employee needs, while the matching model ties HRM directly to organizational objectives through performance-driven targets. After weighing the long-term implications of both approaches, the paper recommends the universal model as the more sustainable strategy for improving productivity, employee engagement, and overall organizational performance.
Over the last several years, major transformations have been occurring in the workplace, as organizations have increasingly focused on how their employees can help firms increase profit margins and productivity. Staff members are now viewed as a valuable commodity that allows a corporation to adapt to changes within the marketplace. This recognition has led to a growing emphasis on addressing the needs of workers and, in turn, to the creation of various theoretical strategic HRM frameworks designed to deal with the underlying challenges that all companies face.
To determine which approach is most effective, it is necessary to examine the various theories, conduct an analysis of each strategy, and make recommendations as to which one delivers the best outcomes. Together, these elements provide the greatest insights into the HRM approaches that organizations should adopt.
In the 1980s, there was a fundamental shift in strategic HRM. Firms began to realize that their employees played a major role in helping them respond to changes occurring inside the marketplace, particularly as globalization affected their ability to compete effectively. Over time, this led to a shift in the way organizations dealt with these challenges, giving rise to various strategic management principles — most notably the universal and matching models.
The universal model is focused on combining all of the different HR policies into one workable solution. The underlying idea is that everyone will be able to work together more effectively by following a consistent series of policies and procedures based on a standardized, closed format. When this framework is in place, it produces a positive change inside the operating environment of the firm. This strategy helps HR create a workable solution that can be implemented across large organizations (Bach 2009).
The matching model is characterized by a tight alignment between HRM policies and the objectives of the organization. Under this approach, the HR department is not primarily focused on supporting the personal needs of staff members. Instead, it concentrates on helping the firm achieve its goals by pushing employees to go the extra mile. This is accomplished through an open process that emphasizes teamwork across various groups. As a result, executives interact more directly with staff members to accomplish organizational tasks. This kind of approach helps companies concentrate on reaching their goals and creates change both in the culture of the firm and in its operating environment (Bach 2009).
With regard to the universal model, it is clear that this approach can help increase a business's productivity and profit margins. The reason is that it changes the way employees view the organization and the role they play within it. This fundamental shift, over the long term, helps a corporation adapt more effectively in the marketplace.
"Comparative evaluation of long-term implications"
"Universal model recommended as best approach"
"Academic and institutional sources cited"
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.