Traditional IPO vs. Online Auction IPO: Best Approach for AVG
This paper analyzes the two primary initial public offering (IPO) approaches — the traditional investment-bank-led process and the auction-based online IPO — to determine which is most appropriate for AVG Technologies. It outlines the mechanics, costs, risks, and investor profiles associated with each method, then applies those findings to AVG's specific situation: a global online audience and an unconventional business model. Drawing on precedents from Google's and Morningstar's auction-based IPOs, the paper argues that an online auction IPO better serves AVG's interests by reducing underwriting costs, broadening investor access, and enabling more accurate price discovery.
- Introduction to AVG's IPO Decision: AVG's IPO filing and the central question
- How the Traditional IPO Process Works: Investment bank underwriting and road show mechanics
- How the Auction-Based IPO Process Works: Internet-based bidding and incremental price reduction
- Why an Online Auction IPO Is Best for AVG: Investor access, pricing efficiency, and AVG fit
- Costs and Risks of Each IPO Approach: Underwriter fees, direct costs, and comparative risks
- Conclusion: Recommendation and lessons from Google's IPO
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It structures the argument comparatively, first explaining both IPO methods neutrally before applying them to AVG, which prevents bias from entering the analysis prematurely.
- It grounds its recommendation in concrete data — citing the 7% vs. 4% underwriter spread and the 28.04% vs. 8.17% total issue cost figures — giving the business case quantitative weight.
- It uses a real-world analogue (Google's auction IPO) to lend credibility to the recommendation and acknowledge where the model has fallen short in practice.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied comparative analysis: it defines two competing approaches, evaluates them along parallel criteria (costs, risks, investor types, outcomes), and then maps those criteria onto a specific firm's circumstances to justify a recommendation. This technique is standard in business case writing and finance coursework.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with context on AVG's IPO filing and the central question it must answer. Two body sections define and contrast the traditional and auction-based IPO processes. A third body section argues for the auction approach using AVG-specific reasoning across investor scope, pricing efficiency, and cost. A final section weighs risks on both sides before the conclusion restates the recommendation and flags remaining considerations.
Introduction to AVG's IPO Decision
An Initial Public Offering (IPO) is the first sale of stock by a company seeking further growth. IPOs are commonly used to generate the capital necessary for expansion. AVG is an example of a company looking for further growth through an initial public offering, as the firm is uniquely positioned to lead innovation in its industry. While the company announced its filing for a proposed initial public offering in 2012, the central question is whether to pursue the traditional IPO approach or an auction-based alternative.
It remained unclear which approach AVG would use, given its global online audience and unconventional business model. Although the traditional IPO approach has been the dominant method historically, the auction-based or online auction IPO emerged as a credible alternative through the initial public offerings of Google and Morningstar. Determining the most appropriate IPO process for AVG requires a careful analysis of each approach based on its advantages, costs, risks, types of investors it attracts, and lessons learned from prior examples.
How the Traditional IPO Process Works
The traditional IPO process involves the company's recruitment of an investment bank to underwrite the offering. The investment bank and the company conduct research on the probable market value of the firm, then determine the number of shares to be offered and the price per share based on their findings and the capital to be raised ("Traditional IPO vs. Auction-Based IPO," n.d.). This is followed by a road show in which the offering is presented to large investors, such as wealthy individuals and institutional investors.
During the road show, interested parties commit to purchasing a certain number of shares at the stated price. Once the road show concludes, the commitments are analyzed and shares are allocated — investors are not necessarily awarded the shares they expressed interest in buying. The investment bank then collects a sales commission along with other fees incurred in underwriting the IPO. After this process is complete, investors begin trading on the first day the stock becomes publicly available.
References
"AVG Technologies Announces Filing for Proposed Initial Public Offering." (2012, January 13). PR Newswire — A UBM PLC Company. Retrieved August 24, 2013, from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/avg-technologies-announces-filing-for-proposed-initial-public-offering-137268478.html
Hensel, N. (2005, April 11). Are Dutch auctions right for your IPO? Retrieved from Harvard Business School website: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/4747.html
"Traditional IPO vs. Auction-Based IPO." (n.d.). Essortment: Your Source for Knowledge. Retrieved August 24, 2013, from http://www.essortment.com/traditional-ipo-vs.-auction-based-ipo-24886.html
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.