This paper examines misattribution as a psychological phenomenon in which individuals incorrectly assign the origin of a memory or behavior to the wrong source. Three primary forms are discussed: cryptomnesia, in which a person unknowingly recycles a previously encountered idea as their own; false memories, in which events are recalled inaccurately or fabricated entirely; and source confusion, in which the origin of information becomes conflated with another person's account. Each type is illustrated with a concrete example drawn from everyday experience, grounded in the source-monitoring framework established by Johnson, Hashtroudi, and Lindsay (1993).
Misattribution is a common psychological phenomenon in which individuals incorrectly assign the origin of an event or behavior to the wrong source. This often occurs during routine tasks, where a person may attribute an action to one individual when, in reality, a completely separate individual performed it. Misattribution of memory is generally divided into three distinct elements: cryptomnesia, false memories, and source confusion. Each of these occurs in varying degrees and with varying consequences for how we understand and recall the world around us.
The first type is cryptomnesia, a phenomenon in which an individual believes they are the original generator of a thought or idea that actually originated from a past experience. This frequently arises in academic contexts through a process known as inadvertent plagiarism. In such cases, a scholar may unknowingly reproduce a concept or idea they previously encountered, sincerely believing it to be their own original work. This happens because the individual attributes the source of the idea to their own skill and creativity rather than recognizing it as something encountered before (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993).
Cryptomnesia is particularly insidious because it carries no conscious intent to deceive — the person genuinely does not remember that the idea was encountered elsewhere, making it one of the subtler forms of memory error.
The second type is false memories, in which a person recalls an event that did not actually occur, or recalls details of a real event inaccurately. For example, when recounting a witnessed crime, an individual might confidently report that the getaway car was white when it was, in fact, blue. False memories can vary widely in degree, ranging from the forgetting of small peripheral details to the wholesale fabrication of significant events. This variability makes them particularly challenging to detect and address, especially in high-stakes contexts such as eyewitness testimony.
"Conflating another person's memory with one's own"
"Citation for Johnson et al. 1993 source monitoring"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.