This case brief analyzes United States v. Greber, a landmark 1985 Third Circuit decision addressing Medicare fraud and illegal kickbacks. Dr. Greber's company, Cardio-Med, billed Medicare for Holter monitor services and funneled portions of payments back to referring physicians as "interpretation fees," even when Dr. Greber performed the interpretations himself. The brief examines the factual background, procedural history, legal issues, holdings, rationale, and final disposition of the case, illustrating how misrepresentation for financial gain and improper remuneration to referring physicians constitute federal healthcare fraud under the revised Medicare anti-kickback statute enacted by Congress in 1977.
United States v. Greber, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 1985, is a foundational case in healthcare fraud law. It established key interpretations of the Medicare anti-kickback statute and defined the boundaries of illegal remuneration to referring physicians.
Dr. Greber's company, Cardio-Med, supplied Holter monitors — devices worn by patients that record heartbeats for later interpretation. Investigations revealed that Cardio-Med billed Medicare and then gave a portion of each payment to the prescribing physician under the heading "interpretation fees," even when Dr. Greber himself actually performed the interpretation of the data. The fixed percentage paid to referring physicians was found to exceed what Medicare allowed for such services.
Additionally, Medicare requires that the device be used for eight hours or more to qualify for payment. Cardio-Med and Dr. Greber reported longer operation times than patients actually used their monitors.
In 1977, Congress amended the Medicare fraud statute to address problems such as kickbacks. Under the revised statute, kickbacks were defined broadly as any remuneration that might in any way be perceived as encouraging one party to do business exclusively with a particular company.
United States Attorneys brought a number of fraud charges against Dr. Greber. The case raised five distinct legal issues:
1. Did Dr. Greber make claims for services or equipment that were neither needed nor used?
2. Did Dr. Greber pay money from Medicare reimbursements back to doctors who used his equipment?
3. Did Dr. Greber misreport the amount of time his equipment was used?
4. Did Dr. Greber make payments to other physicians for services he himself had provided?
5. Did Dr. Greber use the United States Postal Service to bill for equipment and services that were never needed or used?
"Court answers all five issues affirmatively"
"Fraud logic applied to each allegation"
"Appellate court affirms lower court ruling"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.