This essay analyzes John Updike's short story "My Father's Tears," examining how the narrator's retrospective viewpoint reframes the childhood memory of his father's tears at a train station departure. The paper explores the story's central themes — the limits of youthful perspective, the inevitability of aging and death, and the complexity of parent-child relationships — through contrasts between two families' temperaments and faiths. The essay also considers the story's culturally specific mid-twentieth-century New England setting alongside its universal emotional resonance, concluding with a personal reflection on appreciating parents as fallible, finite human beings.
In his short story "My Father's Tears," author John Updike contrasts his narrator's childhood perceptions of his father's tears — shed as the father sent his son away to college on the train — with a present-day perspective. As an older man, the narrator now understands what once seemed like mere sentimentality. The young narrator had been impatient to grow up and impatient with his father. The main point of the story is the inaccessibility of knowledge and the limited perspective of the young, realized only when it is too late. Although Updike's story is very much a product of its place and time — a mid-twentieth-century New England still populated by old-fashioned Transcendentalists, commuters who travel to the city by train, and a society in which smoking is a rite of passage — the relationships between parents and sons are eternal.
Much of the story evolves through a series of comparisons between the narrator's own father and mother and his experience of his ex-wife Deb's Unitarian father. Deb's father was an austere, competent man who died from Alzheimer's disease, in contrast to the narrator's more conventional father, who blamed all of his own marital troubles on "women's issues." The two families differed both in temperament and faith: although Deb's father was a minister, her family did not subscribe to dogma, while the narrator's family refused to work on Sundays. Ultimately, the differences between Deb and the narrator proved too great — something his father attributed to Deb's supposed lack of femininity. The narrator, now older and wiser, can appreciate his father despite his father's faults, and can also appreciate his father's sentimentality, however imperfect the past might be.
People are both changing and unchanging in the story. On one hand, age takes away people's minds and bodies. On the other hand, during the narrator's reunion, he envisions everyone still as kindergartners, even though the gathering is made up of grandparents with walkers. "We don't see ourselves that way, as lame and old. We see kindergarten children — the same round fresh faces" (Updike 11). The group is surprised to learn that the narrator's father has died, a revelation that underlines their own mortality as much as his. This surprise and regret at aging is universal, just as the tears of the father that open the story are universal.
"Closing lines and father's mortality understood"
"Personal takeaway on appreciating finite parental lives"
You’re 60% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.