This paper examines the U.S. Constitution as a document designed to remedy critical deficiencies in the Articles of Confederation, including the absence of executive power, federal taxation authority, and judicial systems. It traces how constitutional provisions—particularly Articles I, II, and III—established the three branches of government to address these gaps. The paper also analyzes the constitutional amendment process, explaining why the Framers intentionally made amendments difficult through requirements for supermajority approval in Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the states. Four amendment methods are outlined, though only the standard congressional route has seen regular use. The paper emphasizes how these structural safeguards were designed to prevent hasty changes and protect the Constitution's founding principles.
The Constitution was envisioned to solve many challenges that the Articles of Confederation had faced as the governing framework for the United States. Although the Articles contained several flaws, five stood out as most critical.
First, the Articles of Confederation invested no executive powers in any executive branch. The Constitution remedied this through Article II, Section 1, which vested executive powers in the president and vice president, each holding office for a four-year term.
Second, the Articles lacked the power to collect taxes or regulate commerce. The Constitution addressed this weakness in Article I, Section 8, which charged Congress with the power to set tax levels, collect them, and regulate trade and commerce with other nations.
Third, the Articles provided no federal court system. The Constitution established this through Article III, Sections 1 and 2, which invested judicial powers in one Supreme Court and authorized the creation of inferior courts.
Fourth, amending the Articles required unanimous consent, making change nearly impossible. The Constitution streamlined this process by requiring only a two-thirds majority in each house of Congress to propose an amendment, and three-fourths of the states to ratify it.
Fifth, the Articles lacked authority to control military services. The Constitution granted Congress this power under Article I, Section 8, authorizing the creation and support of an army and navy, along with rules to govern them (The Federalist Papers Project, n.d).
The Declaration of Independence enumerated several grievances that the Constitution subsequently addressed. One major complaint concerned harassment by foreign mercenaries, which the Constitution resolved by declaring each citizen independent and guaranteeing the right to due process of law.
Another grievance involved governors passing laws of pressing importance without broader consent. The Constitution corrected this by entrusting Congress with the authority to create laws, including those requiring urgent action.
The colonists also protested taxation without representation. The Constitution resolved this by making Congress, the peoples' representatives, responsible for levying taxes.
Finally, colonists complained about the lack of independent judicial power under British rule. The Constitution addressed this by creating an independent judiciary with authority to hear and determine cases appropriately.
The Constitution can be amended through four distinct methods, though the Framers deliberately made the process difficult to protect the document's fundamental principles.
The first and most commonly used method involves a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress proposing an amendment. Alternatively, a constitutional convention can be called by two-thirds of the state legislatures to propose an amendment. Once proposed through either avenue, the amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures or by conventions in three-fourths of the states. The congressional route remains the standard, while the convention method has been used only once to ratify a proposed amendment (U.S. Constitution Online, 2010).
Three additional amendment methods are provided for in the Constitution, though none have been employed in practice. One involves state conventions proposing amendments and state conventions ratifying them. Another allows state conventions to propose amendments with ratification by state legislatures. The final method permits a constitutional convention to propose amendments with state legislatures to ratify them.
"Supermajority requirements and checks on executive power"
You’re 79% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.