This essay applies Hermann Bahr's theory of Expressionism to Vincent van Gogh's post-Impressionist painting The Night Café. Drawing on Bahr's argument that great art expresses the artist's inner reality rather than merely reproducing external appearances, the essay examines how Van Gogh's swirling colors, warm lighting, and indistinct figures simultaneously depict a dingy bar and the painter's own psychological state. The analysis contrasts Expressionism with both Realism and Impressionism, arguing that Van Gogh's choices — which figures to include, how light is rendered, the emotional weight of each scene — reveal the artist's soul as much as they document a physical place.
This paper models applied theory: rather than simply describing the painting or summarizing Bahr, the student uses Bahr's framework as a lens to generate original interpretive claims about a specific artwork. Each quotation from Bahr is immediately followed by an application to The Night Café, showing how secondary sources should function as tools for analysis rather than substitutes for it.
The essay opens by introducing the central tension — inner versus outer reality — with a direct quotation. It then establishes the theoretical contrast between Realism, Impressionism, and Expressionism before applying that contrast to Van Gogh's painting across three body paragraphs. Each paragraph zooms in progressively: from the work as a whole, to individual figures in the scene, to the psychological implications of the artist's choices. The conclusion widens back out to a general claim about art's liberating power.
"Two influences work on us, an outer one and one from within us" (Bahr 117). This idea — that Expressionism in art depicts the artist's inner reality as much as an exterior reality — is manifest even in the post-Impressionist work of Vincent van Gogh entitled The Night Café. The swirls of color portraying the hazy lighting and the indistinct features of the café's inhabitants create the impression of being in a smoky, dingy bar, and also suggest the dissolute lives of the drinkers and pool players. But the portrait is not merely of light and shade: the circles around the lights, for example, seem like a fantastic creation of the artist, as does the slightly drunken swaying of the lines that define the café space.
The artist's attitude about the café is ambiguous. On one hand, there are scenes of drinking and gambling, and the blurry images of the inhabitants suggest people who are frittering their lives away. Yet the light that illuminates the room is warm. The sense of refuge and relief from reality is the kind of sensation someone may feel in a pub — alongside the drinker's anonymity and loneliness. Both feelings are simultaneously depicted in The Night Café.
Through art, human beings make sense of nature and separate themselves from it. Art has elevated human beings: the artist "draws his own God and sets them up against nature," wrote the art critic Hermann Bahr about the early Expressionist movement (Bahr 118). This was a radical assertion at the time, given that so much of art history had attempted to depict nature — including the human form — as it "really" was in "reality." According to Bahr, Impressionism is false because it attempts to leave out the human, inner element and instead depicts only what the eye sees. It is, in essence, no better than the Realism it was reacting against: Realism creates a photographic or idealistic representation of life, while Impressionism uses color and shading to similarly focus on the purely visual.
Moving away from Impressionism, artists like Van Gogh sought to encapsulate inner truth as well as external reality. The Night Café is not merely a visual impression; it is also an impression of the artist's feeling about the life depicted there. It reveals Van Gogh's inner self — his sense of warmth derived from the world, the café's anonymous quality, and the focus on drinking and gambling are all simultaneously present in the envisioned space. "The eye of the Impressionist only beholds, it does not speak" (Bahr 118). Bahr calls Impressionist paintings merely a gramophone — a reproducer of the experiences of others — while Expressionism attempts to deeply explore the artist's self.
You’re 57% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.