Essay Undergraduate 791 words

Workplace Safety and Situational Crisis Management Guide

~4 min read

Abstract

This paper examines workplace safety and situational crisis management with a focus on two primary threat categories: disgruntled former employees and non-employee perpetrators. It outlines the elevated risk period immediately following terminations, the importance of coordinating payroll, IT, and security departments during employee separation, and the psychological value of dignified exit procedures. The paper also addresses vulnerabilities in standard security systems when violence is perpetrated by non-employees—particularly family members of current staff—and recommends layered physical access controls, personnel training, and routine surveillance of external grounds to mitigate risks that secured building access alone cannot eliminate.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

▼

What makes this paper effective

The paper clearly distinguishes between two separate threat categories—former employees and non-employees—and tailors its recommendations to the specific vulnerabilities each group exploits.
Practical, actionable guidance is grounded in cited expert sources, giving institutional credibility to the security recommendations presented.
The paper moves logically from threat identification to psychological mitigation to physical countermeasures, creating a coherent policy framework rather than a simple list of tips.

Key academic technique demonstrated

This paper demonstrates applied policy analysis: it uses published sources to frame a real-world problem, identifies systemic gaps in common practices, and derives specific procedural recommendations. The discussion of how securing building access can inadvertently displace violence to external areas is a strong example of second-order reasoning—anticipating unintended consequences of security measures.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with historical context for the growth of workplace violence, then addresses the ex-employee threat through two lenses: tactical containment (revoking credentials, securing access cards) and psychological mitigation (dignified exits, timely final paychecks). It then pivots to non-employee threats, critiquing standard security systems' limitations and closing with a recommendation for external surveillance and foot patrols. The two-part structure maps cleanly onto distinct threat profiles.

Introduction: The Rise of Workplace Violence

Deadly violence in the workplace is a phenomenon that grew substantially in the last few decades of the 20th century, before which it occurred so infrequently that it was completely unheard of in many places. Since several high-profile tragedies in recent years, workplace security management has included building safety protocols designed to prevent access by unauthorized individuals to company grounds and facilities (Schmalleger, 2001). In general, concerns about security intensified in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks, as most professional businesses that had not already tightened their security procedures began doing so immediately.

Security Risks Posed by Disgruntled Former Employees

Security audits suggest that one of the principal ways of reducing the potential for serious workplace violence is to focus on the initial period immediately following firings and other less than amicable severances of the employer/employee relationship. This is mainly because many disgruntled ex-employees with grievances—real or imagined—against their employers tend to experience the most anger and hostility immediately after their departure, and are therefore substantially more likely to perpetrate acts of revenge within the next few days than later (Larsen, 2007).

In that regard, it is crucial to coordinate various departments—such as payroll and IT—with security services. Separation protocol must include the immediate revocation of system credentials and remote system access as soon as the former employee leaves the facility. Likewise, physical access cards and keys must be secured prior to the final escorted departure from the premises. In addition to coordinating appropriate message displays and screen prompts corresponding to separated personnel within the front-line lobby security system, security personnel briefings must include daily updates and information printouts with pictures of recently separated employees.

Reducing Incentives for Workplace Violence

Often overlooked is the role of reducing the incentive for workplace violence, rather than focusing exclusively on limiting the tactical capability of ex-employees to perpetrate it. Specifically, industrial psychologists suggest that employers often unwittingly exacerbate tensions and resentment unnecessarily—for example, by delaying final paychecks or complicating what should be the smoothest possible departure (Larsen, 2007). Separated employees who receive their final paycheck immediately upon departure tend to leave in better spirits than those who do not. Similarly, it is important to train everyone involved in the exit protocol to allow the departing employee to maintain personal dignity throughout that process.

2 Locked Sections · 320 words remaining

Security Threats from Non-Employees · 190 words

"Limitations of standard security against outsider threats"

Protecting External and Unsecured Areas · 130 words

"Surveillance and foot patrols for unsecured external zones"

You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.

130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime

Key Concepts in This Paper

Workplace Violence Disgruntled Employees Access Control Employee Separation Exit Protocol Non-Employee Threats Security Training External Surveillance Crisis Management Physical Security