Workplace Safety and Situational Crisis Management Guide
This paper examines workplace safety and situational crisis management with a focus on two primary threat categories: disgruntled former employees and non-employee perpetrators. It outlines the elevated risk period immediately following terminations, the importance of coordinating payroll, IT, and security departments during employee separation, and the psychological value of dignified exit procedures. The paper also addresses vulnerabilities in standard security systems when violence is perpetrated by non-employees—particularly family members of current staff—and recommends layered physical access controls, personnel training, and routine surveillance of external grounds to mitigate risks that secured building access alone cannot eliminate.
- Introduction: The Rise of Workplace Violence: Historical growth of workplace violence and security responses
- Security Risks Posed by Disgruntled Former Employees: Credential revocation and access control after termination
- Reducing Incentives for Workplace Violence: Dignified exit procedures to reduce post-termination hostility
- Security Threats from Non-Employees: Limitations of standard security against outsider threats
- Protecting External and Unsecured Areas: Surveillance and foot patrols for unsecured external zones
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly distinguishes between two separate threat categories—former employees and non-employees—and tailors its recommendations to the specific vulnerabilities each group exploits.
- Practical, actionable guidance is grounded in cited expert sources, giving institutional credibility to the security recommendations presented.
- The paper moves logically from threat identification to psychological mitigation to physical countermeasures, creating a coherent policy framework rather than a simple list of tips.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates applied policy analysis: it uses published sources to frame a real-world problem, identifies systemic gaps in common practices, and derives specific procedural recommendations. The discussion of how securing building access can inadvertently displace violence to external areas is a strong example of second-order reasoning—anticipating unintended consequences of security measures.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with historical context for the growth of workplace violence, then addresses the ex-employee threat through two lenses: tactical containment (revoking credentials, securing access cards) and psychological mitigation (dignified exits, timely final paychecks). It then pivots to non-employee threats, critiquing standard security systems' limitations and closing with a recommendation for external surveillance and foot patrols. The two-part structure maps cleanly onto distinct threat profiles.
Introduction: The Rise of Workplace Violence
Deadly violence in the workplace is a phenomenon that grew substantially in the last few decades of the 20th century, before which it occurred so infrequently that it was completely unheard of in many places. Since several high-profile tragedies in recent years, workplace security management has included building safety protocols designed to prevent access by unauthorized individuals to company grounds and facilities (Schmalleger, 2001). In general, concerns about security intensified in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks, as most professional businesses that had not already tightened their security procedures began doing so immediately.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.