Essay Topic Hub

21st Century
Essays

3,179+ paper examples, study guides & outlines

3,179 papers
1 subject area
UG & Grad levels
Free to browse
What is 21st Century?

The 21st century as a historical topic invites students to examine the forces reshaping contemporary society, from globalization and economic policy to evolving social norms and institutional change. It appears across disciplines including history, sociology, political science, business, and public health, precisely because the period resists clean boundaries — students must treat the recent past as history while its consequences are still unfolding. What makes it academically compelling is the tension between continuity and transformation: inherited structures meeting new pressures in real time.

Papers on this topic take a wide range of approaches. Some adopt a policy-analysis angle, examining how institutions like the Federal Reserve responded to economic conditions between 2000 and 2010. Others focus on social issues — racial bias and eyewitness memory, adolescent obesity, or the rights of gay and lesbian parents — situating contemporary debates within longer historical trajectories. Still others approach the period through organizational and management frameworks, exploring how leadership, ethics, and budgeting function in modern institutions. The common thread is using specific cases to say something broader about how society operates and changes.

A strong essay on the 21st century requires a focused thesis rather than a sweeping survey — scope it to a specific issue, policy, or social dynamic rather than the era as a whole. Evidence drawn from documented events, policy records, and verifiable social data carries the most weight. The most common pitfall is treating the period as too recent to analyze historically, which leads to opinion-heavy writing; grounding arguments in concrete developments and established frameworks keeps the analysis rigorous.

3,179 papers
Sort by:
Paper Masters
Leadership: Three Theories, Three Centuries
This paper reviews literature including meta-analysis to compare theoretical schema classifying leadership styles over the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries, demonstrated with examples from the real world. Historical examples demonstrate that while many experts have tried to describe leadership in terms of shared traits, inheritance or environmental constraint, no clear consensus on even a definition of "leadership" apparently exists as numerous authorities over several decades explain. Recommendations for the 21st century derive useful constructs from research precedent but attempt to weed out theoretic fads or classification schema that fail to explain contradictions as well as similarities.
Paper Undergraduate
Strategic Thinking in Today\'s Global
In today's global business environment, strategy and change necessarily go hand in hand. It is impossible to operate in a business environment without taking into account the dynamics of change.
Research Paper Undergraduate
Videoconferencing K-12 Purpose of Videoconferencing
The purpose of Interactive Videoconferencing (IVC) is to bring the world into the classroom. When rising gas and transportation costs keep students immobile, the students may invite the site they wished to visit onto…
Research Paper Undergraduate
Business operations and practices in India
Exceed Corporation - Doing Business in India
Paper Doctorate
Public Relations Strategy Public Relations
Public relations can be defined as a premeditated and continued effort to institute and maintain benevolence and mutual understanding between an organization and its audiences. This is a discipline which takes care of…
Research Paper Undergraduate
Middle Schools With Content Material
When something is made a priority, it is by definition supposed to get better. Alas, this has not been the case with initiatives intended to improve adolescent literacy rates in recent years, and despite legislation…
Research Paper Undergraduate
Midsummer Night\'s Dream the Stuff
The Stuff that Dreams are Made of:" "A Midsummer's Night's Dream" and "Thirteen Going on Thirty"
Essay Doctorate
Mary Landrieu, Senator From Louisiana: Views on Issues of Federal Government and State Government
This is a paper on the political and social views that the Louisiana senator, Mary Landrieu has. there are issues to do with the functions of the federal government and how she views them, the relevance and applicability of the K-12 education policy,the applicability of No Child Left Behind policy in the contemporary society , her view on environment as well as her take on the state crimes and how crime should he handled.
Research Paper Undergraduate
Independence of the Black Church
Throughout American history, the black church has played an important role in the African-American community. According to King (1998), "The black church has always been a positive force in the struggle for justice and…
Paper Undergraduate
Manager\'s Likeability on Leadership Success
The likeability of a manager will determine how effective they are on transactionally-oriented tasks while also being a very accurate predicator of hwo effective they will be in more transformational roles in an organization. The intent of this analysis is to define likeability from a leadership standpoint, illustrating how this aspect of a leader's personality must be authentic, transparent in approach and genuine in how a leader earns and keeps the trust of subordinates, peers and superiors. A likeable person is by definition one that is known for their friendliness or the ability to create an ongoing dialogue that includes a significant level of self-disclosure and ability to communicate with accuracy, clarity and honesty (George, 1995). A likeable leader is one that has the ability to combine friendliness, relevance of communication to others, empathy or the capacity to feel what others are also feeling ands enunciate those emotions, all unified by a very strong level of authenticity, integrity and realness (Gabriel, Griffiths, 2002). All of these factors together define a likeable person, and add in the willingness of a leader to self-sacrifice, create and stay consistent with roles in an organization that capitalize on the unique strengths of an associate, and a strong foundation of transformational leadership begins to emerge. One of the key findings of this study is that to the extent a manager has the ability to create and sustain a high level of trust with subordinates is the extent to which they are able to also sustain transformational leadership in a team. While leaders have varying levels and depths of skills that contribute to their ability to be transformational in the scope of their work, those with demonstrated high levels of emotional intelligence (EI) combined with the four foundational aspects of transformational leadership skills consistently have a higher level of likeability than their more transaction-oriented counterparts (Gabriel, Griffiths, 2002). In evaluating if likeability leads to greater leadership performance, a model of proposed Likeability and Organizational Transformation has been created and is presented in this analysis. The existing body of research indicates that likeability is one of the foundational elements of effective transformational leadership, yet it does not exist in isolation. The accumulated research completed for this study indicates that likeability of a leader is highly correlated to their level of EI. The dimensions of EI have a direct, predictive effect on how likeable and effective a leader will be. Another finding from this analysis is that likeability by itself does not guarantee a leader will be effective; it is only their ability to translate EI-based skills in conjunction with a very strong foundation of transformational skills that they are able to accomplish challenging goals and propel an organization to fulfill its shared vision. This study also concludes that likeability is also not essential for success either, as the many examples from leaders and CEOs renowned for being very difficult to work with who have propelled their organizations to leadership positions in their industries. Larry Ellison of Oracle, known for being exceptionally demanding and for creating a culture of mistrust and intense internal competition is not likeable according to the dimensions of the research completed for this study. He is however exceptionally effective in driving his organization to attain its vision and mission. What this study has found is that when the triad factors of Emotional Intelligence (EI), trust and transformational leadership are combined, leaders increase the propensity of being liked. These three factors combined provide leaders with a solid foundation of being effective in their roles as well. Likeability does not assure results however. Figure 1, Analysis of Key Factors of Likeability, shows how these three factors must be balanced and in proportion to each other in a leader's management style to be effective. Deficiencies in EI for example could lead to a very collegial work environment yet the leader would not know how and when to define tasks and key strategies to accomplish objectives over time. All three must be balanced in order for a catalyst of continued progress to be formed and stabilized within an organization.