Essay Topic Hub

Atheism
Essays

167+ paper examples, study guides & outlines

167 papers
UG & Grad levels
Free to browse
What is Atheism?

Atheism, broadly defined as the absence or rejection of belief in God or gods, is a central subject in philosophy of religion, theology, and ethics courses. Students engage with it because it sits at the intersection of metaphysics, epistemology, and moral theory, raising fundamental questions about the existence of God, the basis of belief, and how humans find meaning without religious frameworks. The topic gains additional academic weight through its relationship to scientific reasoning, particularly debates around evolution and empirical evidence, and through thinkers like Karl Marx, whose critique of religion frames atheism within social and political theory. Works such as C. S. Lewis's Mere Christianity appear frequently as counterpoints, giving students a structured theistic argument to analyze and contest.

Papers on this topic take a range of approaches. Comparative and argumentative essays weigh theism against atheism, assessing which position is more philosophically defensible based on logic and evidence. Response-style papers engage directly with specific texts or philosophical articles, evaluating claims about proof, belief, and the limits of scientific knowledge. Other essays explore atheism through broader frameworks, including existentialism, family values, and worldview analysis, treating it as a lens for examining how individuals and societies construct meaning.

A strong essay on atheism establishes a clear, narrow thesis rather than attempting to resolve the entire God debate in one paper. Evidence drawn from philosophical argument, logical consistency, and acknowledged scholarly positions tends to carry more weight than personal conviction alone. The most common pitfall is conflating atheism with related positions such as agnosticism or anti-religion, so defining terms precisely at the outset is essential for maintaining a focused and credible argument.

167 papers
Sort by:
Essay Doctorate
Narcissistic blindness in Hemingway and O'Connor's fiction
¶ … myth of Narcissus is often misunderstood; many of the readers of the myth interpret the events as Narcissus gazing down at his own reflection in the water and falling in love with himself.
Paper Undergraduate
Descartes' dream argument and sensory distinctions in epistemology
¶ … Philosophy of Descartes and its rational transition through the stages of senses, self (Cogito) and God (Innate Idea). Find two criticisms on Descartes approach to philosophy.
Paper Undergraduate
Socratic philosophy and medieval conceptions of ethics and being
These four dialogues describe the discussion of Socrates during times of trial, imprisonment, and execution of Socrates. Socrates presents his defense in the second dialogue the Apology. Should society charge individuals who challenge impunity or reward them. Socrates however fails to defend himself and receives a death sentence. Crito, Socrates friend tries to persuade him to flee the sentence, but in the course of their discussion, a question about civil foundation and moral law including treatment similar to the present emerges.
Paper Undergraduate
Meursault's rejection of Christian immortality in Camus' The Stranger
The motif of the crucifix in the courtroom is significant of Camus' brush with Christianity through the novel of the ‘Stranger' as a whole. The examining magistrate waves the crucifix at Meursault symbolizing that all that Meursault stands for, and indirectly, therefore, Camus, militates against the basic axioms of Christianity. And what are these axioms? Christianity believes in life after death – in immortality of the soul and continuance of eternal life. Meursault refuses to hope, claiming that human life is irrational and purposeless and that death is the end-result to all creatures. More so, that existence of soul does not exist ant that it is futile, if not cruel and absurd to hope. Meursault, and through him his creator, Camus, would have been surprised to discover that Christianity's main belief is not immortality of the soul, but rather immortality of the body.
Research Paper Doctorate
Hypocrisy and true charity in Molière's Tartuffe
An Analysis of Hypocrisy in Moliere's Tartuffe
Paper Doctorate
The sublime in Western thought from Longinus to modernity
The sublime has been understood in various ways throughout history -- but most simply thus: as greatness beyond all measure. Longinus gave the Western world the first treatise on the sublime, which was essentially a…
Research Paper Doctorate
Theistic and atheistic philosophies of God's existence
Philosophies of religion generally fall into one of two camps: theistic and atheistic views. The former provides proofs or arguments in favor of the existence of God, whereas the latter offers proofs or arguments…
Paper Undergraduate
Irony and arrogance in Twain and O'Connor's fiction
¶ … arrogance of faith and atheism: Mark Twain's "The Story of the Good Little Boy" and Flannery O'Connor's "Good Country People"
Research Paper Doctorate
Roman hostility toward early Christianity and pagan criticism
Early Christianity did not develop in isolation, but within a complex landscape already occupied by belief systems, social networks, systems of identity, and political institutions, and it is essential not to regard it…
Paper Undergraduate
Marxian naturalism and the rejection of supernatural worldviews
Most Marxian's, in addition to seeing Marxianism as an emancipator social theory, have also seen it as a worldview. Moreover, they have attached considerable importance to it being a coherent and rationally sustainable worldview. As Wilfrid Sellars and Richard Rorty took philosophers to be doing, and legitimately so, Marxians as well want to see how things hang together in the broadest and most inclusive sense of that term. They want to establish, in doing this, that talk of a Spiritual or Supernatural World is nonsense, or at least a mistake, and, as Marx put it grandly, to establish "the truth of this world" (Rorty, 1976). Some of them were what we now call historicists (Gramsci most clearly), but none of them, not even Otto Neurath, were relativists, skeptics, or what some now call postmodernists, who think that there is no truth of this world, or of any world, to be established. They might, if they could have studied Quine and Davidson, and could have read their Putnam and Rorty, have come to be convinced that there is and can be no one uniquely true description of the world.