Essay Topic Hub

Definition
Essays

8,333+ paper examples, study guides & outlines

8,333 papers
1 subject area
UG & Grad levels
Free to browse
What is Definition?

 

Ironically, the definition of the term “definition essay” is not very specific.  Definition essays are short pieces of writing on a particular topic.  However, not every essay on a topic can be properly labeled a definition essay.  Instead, a definition essay is an attempt to describe the topic thoroughly enough for the reader to understand it very well and might be compared to an encyclopedia entry for the topic.  Any of our example essays could provide a good start on a definition essay about the topic.  However, we have collected a sample of our best definition essays and included them below to help you explore the genre.  

8,333 papers
Sort by:
Research Paper Doctorate
Fundamentals of Speech
BULLYING - a TRUE STORY FROM THE MOTHER'S POINT-OF-VIEW
Paper Undergraduate
When Faculties Merge Communicating Change
¶ … faculties merge: Communicating change" by Hughes (2007) is a poorly written qualitative personal account; the result of a "learning journal" containing subjective interpretations that has no discernable…
Paper Doctorate
Contract law principles and applications
As to concerned definition of law there are many definition among various schools of thought of law such that no particular definition is acceptable to them as universal definition of law, but nevertheless there is a…
Paper High School
Cultural Anthropology Marriage and Incest Taboos
Marriage is a sanctioned union between people that establishes certain rights and obligations between those people, their children, and their relatives (Ember & Ember, 2010). These rights and obligations may include…
Paper Undergraduate
Tourism as a Focus of Study
¶ … ethnic tourism and cultural tourism rather blurry?
Paper Undergraduate
Communicative Theory of Biblical Interpretation Any Theory
Allen (1984), Brown (2007), and Kaiser (1994) are like three points on a unidirectional continuum. Allen (1984) is adamant that the Scripture is the Word is the Scripture, and argues that the Scripture is God preaching. Very little room for interpretation or for tacking toward relevance is indicated by Allen's position. Brown (2007) offers a rigorous cognitive framework for approaching the reading of Scripture, and calls on the reader to meet her exacting intellectual standards and respond in a rigorous manner—a position that seems wholly appropriate given that Brown views Scriptural reading as a conversation with God. Brown's communicative theory is considerably more open than Allen's and more flexible than a structuralistic approach, which would preclude attributing substantive importance to individual components of the Scripture. For Brown, and proponents of speech-act theory, the individual components of Scripture may be the hooks on which understanding rests. Kaiser takes a principled view with regard to understanding the Scriptures in the context of the modern world. To those who would object to his "going beyond the Bible," he has at the ready examples of how the Church does exactly that, at its convenience and unabashedly argues that adjustments are made according to "views it believes God to hold true" (Kaiser, 1994). In this regard, Kaiser's criticism points to the Church's willingness to apply a literary criticism approach to Scripture, citing relevance to contemporary society as the pivot point. The very theological paradigms to which Allen (1984) objects are to Kaiser (1994) a natural outcome of a literary criticism approach to Biblical interpretation. The theological paradigms are needed to make assertions about what is Biblical, that is, what God requires in a given situation. Brown posits a more personal and rigorous approach to Scriptural interpretation—demanding that multiple perspectives be considered, to the degree that the essence of a communicative theory of Biblical interpretation contains aspects of literary criticism, structural criticism, and reader-response criticism.
Paper Undergraduate
State Laws and the Rules of State Psychology Board
This paper provides an overview of the professional requirements required to become a psychologist.It discusses the difference between the ethical requirements of the APA versus state licensing boards. It also discusses ethical conflicts of interest that may occur for psychologists working in corporate and government settings. It concludes with the author's discussion of personal ethics.
Paper Doctorate
Compare Rw Emerson\'s Self-Reliance and Thoreau\'s Civil Disobedience
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) was an American lecturer and poet who led the Transcendentalist movement of the mid-19th century and was a proponent of individualism and critic of societal pressures. Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) was also an American poet, but also an abolitionist, naturalist, tax resister, historian and part of the Transcendentalist movement. To understand both of these men and their ideas, it is first necessary to place them in context with the historical and cultural aspects of America from 1820 on.
Paper Doctorate
Archbishop of Sydney, Cardinal Pell (2005), Admits,
This is a four page paper, with seven external sources. It is a position paper on the purpose, nature, and content of religious education from a Catholic perspective. A Catholic school in NSW, Australia is chosen for this paper. The position paper is written in light of documents from the local dioceses and also from the Vatican Council on religious education.
Essay Undergraduate
History and popular culture
This is a four page paper using the article Levine, Lawrence W. "The Folklore of Industrial Society: Popular Culture and its Audiences." AHR Forum. as a focus to answer: What is popular culture? how have historians defined it and how is it different to "folk" or "mass" culture"? How do the different historians define the role of the audience in relation to popular culture? What are the implications of this debate for historians writing the history of popular culture?