Groupware Implementing Groupware: Comparing Costs and Benefits
There are many varying definitions of groupware yet all share a common attribute or characteristic of enabling collaboration, sharing knowledge and providing work teams with greater insight and intelligence into operations. The intent of groupware is to create a scalable, reliable and agile platform for sharing information and knowedlge, both tacit and implicit, throughout distributed enterprises (Kline, 2001). Best practices in groupware encompass interdepartmental, intradivisional and enterprise-wide integration of content and knowledge management processes and systems (Corbitt, Martz, 2003). The benefits of such a pervasive platform for information and knowledge sharing has shown to deliver quantifiable gains in corporate-wide productivity and performance, leading to greater profitability as well (Lukosch, 2004) (Meroño-Cerdán, 2008). With so many benefits and contributions of groupware, it's surprising that more organizations don't adopt these series of technologies to attain their corporate-wide information and knowledge management strategies. In reality implementing groupware is exceptionally difficult because it forces people in companies to change how they work (Chen, Hao, 2002) (Ellis, Gibbs, Rein, 1991). It takes an exceptional level of trust in the implementation and leaders of the implementation to make groupware projects translate into long-term change within any enterprise (Corbitt, Martz, 2003). The technology is the easy part; getting people to change is hard. This paper compares the costs and benefits of groupware, deciding if it is worth it as an enterprise strategy.
Organizational behavior concepts and applications
The basis of all effective leadership is found in how leaders define the expectations, goals, vision, mission and values of an organization. The more effectively any leader can move from being only focused on an authoritarian or transactional role to a transformational one, the greater the agility and flexibility their teams have in attaining objectives (Ivancevich, Konopaske, Matteson, 2010). The intent of this analysis is to evaluate how the process of decision making and cooperation across small groups can be augmented and strengthened through the use of team leadership. Implicit in this study is the use of delegation and responsibility, and how these factors determine overall team effectiveness and accomplishment.
Research Paper
Undergraduate
Governance Is an Essential Component
¶ … governance is an essential component of economic success. Without good governance, particularly in large businesses, it is unlikely that cohesion will result, and hence economic success is likely to be elusive.