Essay Topic Hub

Persuasive
Essays

576+ paper examples, study guides & outlines

576 papers
1 subject area
UG & Grad levels
Free to browse
What is Persuasive Essays (Examples)?

The definition of a persuasive essay is an essay that seeks to persuade the reader to adopt the writer’s perspective on a certain topic.  Persuasive essays may also be known as argumentative essays.  They differ from descriptive essays or even compare and contrast essays in that persuasive essays encourage the reader to adopt a position by the conclusion of the essay.

To write a persuasive essay, it is important for the writer to clearly take a position on the topic.  You want your reader not only to understand that you have taken a position, but to be convinced by your reasoning that your position is the correct one. 

To build a great persuasive essay, the writer needs to establish a clear-cut argument for his or her position.  Usually, the format to do this involves introducing the topic and the position, and then going into detail about the supporting arguments.  A good persuasive argument needs at least three supporting arguments to really explain why the writer’s position is the one the reader should choose. 

The tools necessary for a persuasive essay are logic, reasoning, and addressing the other side of the argument.  All of the supporting arguments need to contain internal logic, but they also need to logically support the writer’s thesis statement or opinion on the topic.  Sometimes, it might even be helpful to use a logic tree to ensure that your supporting arguments are well-reasoned and all support your thesis statement. 

The best way to learn how to write a great persuasive essay is to read persuasive essays on a variety of topics.  We have included some persuasive essay examples to help you familiarize yourself with the genre.  

576 papers
Sort by:
Research Paper Doctorate
Political Science Annotated Bibliography
In the view of Henry J. Abraham (Abraham 1998, 55), "theoretically," just about any qualified law school graduate with ambitions for an important judicial appointment would appear to have a fair chance at being…
Essay Doctorate
Kuhn's account of rationality in scientific revolutions
The paper will contend that scientific revolutions are irrational because science is irrational. As will be demonstrated by Kuhn and other authors, there is no specific logic as to why some theories and paradigms become popular and other do not. To paraphrase Kuhn, often whoever presented the better argument rather than whoever had the superior argument was the one that became popular and supported. In addition, Kuhn sums up the nature of scientific theories, popular or not, in that all scientific theories are empirically successful, but ultimately proven false. Thus, the nature of scientific theory is irrational and the rise of popular theories is irrational. How would scientific revolutions not be irrational also? The paper supports and proposes that Kuhn's views are that scientific revolutions are partially irrational in nature; they are necessary to scientific developments; and scientific revolutions like all revolutions, have political, economic, and cultural implications. Change and revolution are radical and often spring from emotional, psychological or ethical conflicts of interest; when it comes to human emotions, psychology, and ethics, rationality often takes a backseat to irrationality. The paper supplies Kuhn's reasons to think that shifts in scientific revolutions are not wholly rational and that Kuhn's reasoning effectively demonstrates that shifts in scientific thought violate codes of rationality.
Essay Doctorate
Yes: Carla T. Main Carla Main Believes
Should the current legal drinking age in the United States be lowered? This paper examines two opposing viewpoints on that issue, explaining each argument and analyzing each in terms of the quality of argument and the evidence used to support it. Each author is a respected professional who is qualified to write on this topic; their essays were excerpted in a volume of "Taking Sides: Clashing Views in Drugs and Society."
Essay Doctorate
De Bono Describes Four \"Processes\" That He
De Bono describes four "processes" that he says have the same basis. What does this basis seem to be? How do they differ from one another?
Research Paper Doctorate
Accounting auditors' opinions and their significance
¶ … inherent limitations of an audit and what an auditor recognizes this absence of absolute accuracy.
Paper Undergraduate
Graduate program requirements and structures
If I were to describe myself in a single word, it would be 'fluent.' I have striven to make myself fluent in a variety of languages and cultures so my skill set can be adaptable to my current workplace and to the…
Essay Doctorate
Strategic Plan, Part I: Conceptualizing a Business
Strategic Plan, Part I: Conceptualizing a Business
Paper High School
From Arrest to Adjudication
The Fourth Amendment states that law enforcement officers need to receive permission from a legal authority in order to be able to look for evidence or seize objects that might contribute to providing information concerning a criminal act. The context of the amendment and the process of incorporation mean that it can only protect individuals when government officials are involved. It does not protect people in a situation concerning private individuals and this generates much confusion with regard to the degree to which a warrant can affect a person.
Research Paper Doctorate
Active and Passive Euthanasia
¶ … Active and Passive Euthanasia, by James Rachels. Specifically, it will explain his arguments that active euthanasia is morally permissible, and the extent to which his arguments illustrate Kantian and utilitarian…
Paper Undergraduate
Sappho I Think, in the Hypothetical Situation
This is a philosophical analysis of a hypothetical scenario about a woman who is seeking a CSBC, or Caesarean section by choice. The paper analyses the reasoning offered by the woman in the hypothetical and concedes that she seems to be shallow and frivolous in her reasons for requesting this medical procedure. But the paper concludes that there is no good moral reason for denying Wendy a CSBC, and indeed questions whether or not the medical decision-making might not be, in its own way, as flawed as Wendy's.