Sandra Cisneros\'s \"Eyes Zapata,\" Zakaria Tamer\'s \"Sheep,\"
There are a multitude of similarities between Sandra Cisneros' Woman Hollering Creek and Nawal al-Saadawi's In Camera. Women are persecuted in each of these stories in both physical and intellectual means. However, the authors vary considerably in the context in which this persecution occurs--for the former it is for romance, for the latter it is for politics.
New African by Andrea Lee
Calculating the value of literature is much like calculating the value of a work of art—it's mostly personal taste with some somewhat objective criteria (golden ratios and such). So what makes a good book? Mostly, that's up to you. Did you enjoy reading it? Did it meet your objective in reading? Why you read has as much to do with the quality of the work as the work itself. However, in order to equitably evaluate literature, we need to look at why a writer writes, and not just why readers read. If Socrates is to be believed, only the examined life is worth living. Considering how enduring that thought has been, it probably has some merit, and we can apply that to why writers write—to examine life. A piece of prose or poetry that somehow makes us see—as writers and readers—the truth of who we are, good and bad. That's the literature worth reading.