Peace Without Victory, 1861-1865, Author James M. Thesis

¶ … Peace without Victory, 1861-1865," author James M. McPherson discusses the American Civil War and the desire on both sides to achieve peace. Wars are far more easily begun than ended. The North was fighting in order to keep the Union together and to thwart further states from seceding. The South was fighting for what they believed to be their moral right: to govern according to their own ethics, including the right to own slaves. For the Civil War, the stakes were so high that neither side was willing to negotiate a peaceful conclusion until there was absolutely no recourse but to do so. There were three stages of negotiation attempts during the Civil War. The first was foreign mediation, then unofficial contacts, and finally quasi-official conversations. From a foreign perspective, it was believed that the North had very little chance of restoring the United States of America into a single nation. Part of the reason that other countries, Great Britain in particular, chose to side with the South was because of economic interest. McPherson points to the fact that 75% of cotton in England was imported to Great Britain from the American South. France also believed that the "North could never reestablish control over 750,000 square miles of territory defended by a determined and courageous people" (4). Support then for the South from outside sources was the result of economic self-interest rather than...

...

They were also willing to conduct mediation between the North and South. These plans were biased in favor of the Confederacy and the North refused to allow for any consideration of peace that would not end the conflict with a reunited country. Secretary of State Seward made it known that there would be no way the North would agree to any kind of mediation which would allow for the Confederacy to remain intact. Additionally, the United States would break ties with any nation that recognized the South as an independent country. This was also a political maneuver because it forced nations interested in supporting the South to question what the ramifications would be should the South actually lose the war.
The interference from foreign nations in the Civil War made the battles more difficult for Union troops during the initial portion of the war. The Union made it evident that they did not appreciate the involvement of foreign nationals and could not be coerced by other countries into a compromise with the South which would allow them to remain autonomous. Seward's political ally and editor of the New York Times, Henry Raymond, wrote that "The war must go on until the Rebellion…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited:

McPherson, James M. "No Peace without Victory, 1861-1865." The American Historical

Review. 109:1. 2004. Web. Mar. 27.

http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/ahr/109.1/mcpherson.html


Cite this Document:

"Peace Without Victory 1861-1865 Author James M " (2011, March 28) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/peace-without-victory-1861-1865-author-84897

"Peace Without Victory 1861-1865 Author James M " 28 March 2011. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/peace-without-victory-1861-1865-author-84897>

"Peace Without Victory 1861-1865 Author James M ", 28 March 2011, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/peace-without-victory-1861-1865-author-84897

Related Documents

Women and the Home Front in Western North Carolina and Eastern Tennessee during the Civil War This paper examines the living conditions and attitudes that shaped the lives of the women in western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee during and after the American Civil War. The thesis statement should deal with the breakdown of long standing ties between the people of the mountains as they chose to fight for the