Founding Brothers Ellis, Joseph, J. Founding Brothers: Book Review

PAGES
4
WORDS
1210
Cite

Founding Brothers Ellis, Joseph, J. Founding Brothers: the Revolutionary Generation. New York: Knopf, 2000. Print.

The manner the American Republic was established continues to fascinate historians and the lay people alike. For a long time, historians accorded the major role in the formation of the United States to the struggles and virtues of the founding members of the republic. But in the post-Civil Rights era, historians began to pay greater attention to social and cultural history, placing women, minorities, workers, and slaves at the center of their narratives. Ellis Joseph does not see those developments in a negative light but he is nevertheless suspicious of the idea that the character of the nation and its spirit may be recounted through the lives of ordinary folks. He places the lives of the "founding brothers" -- Aaron Burr, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, John Adams, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson -- and one sister (Abigail Adams) at the center of the narrative because he believes the personalities and characters of these founding members made the American Republic. They were the "brothers" who knew each other well but also disagreed with each other passionately at times, one of them causing the death of another, but the manner they solve their differences in a brotherly manner, often challenging each other and thus replicating the institution of checks and balances, was eventually enshrined in the Constitution and the spirit of the American nation.

Ellis divides the book into six chapters, describing some kind of encounter among the founding brothers and making conclusions about their legacies. The first chapter deals with the confrontation between Burr and Hamilton which ended in the tragic death of Hamilton's who died in a duel with the former. In chapter two, Ellis discusses how Jefferson brought both Hamilton and Madison to the table,...

...

Chapter three is devoted to the "silence" of the brothers over the issue of slavery. Unable to confront and solve the problem of slavery, the founders decided to avoid the discussion of what they saw as the national shame of the republic. Chapter four dissects Washington's Farewell Address and his vision of foreign policy for the future of the United States. In chapter five, Ellis talks about the collaborations between Abigail and John Adams as well as between Jefferson and Madison. The sixth chapter is dedicated to the recounting of fourteen-year long correspondence between Jefferson and Adams where they discussed their differences and lost friendship.
According to Ellis, recounting each of these encounters is important in a sense that each tells about a particular kind of debate, confrontation, or collaboration that would in the future resonate in the character of the nation. The fact that Burr and Hamilton were not able to solve their differences without a duel was the evidence that the brotherhood was fragile. In less than a century later, the country almost destroyed itself in a fraternal war. His discussion of "silence" over the problem of slavery is also interesting because the "silence" of the founders spoke volumes. For various reasons and although some of them were slave-owners, the founders wanted slavery to end. Madison and Jefferson of Virginia owned slaves and held negative views toward the black race but they also were very uncomfortable with the existence of the institution. Washington made sure that his slaves would be freed upon his death and expressed aversion to slavery. Franklin was the most vocal anti-slavery voice, joining with Quakers in a moral crusade against slavery. Likewise, Adams and Hamilton were proto-abolitionists, wanting to end slavery but considering…

Cite this Document:

"Founding Brothers Ellis Joseph J Founding Brothers " (2012, February 14) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/founding-brothers-ellis-joseph-j-founding-54237

"Founding Brothers Ellis Joseph J Founding Brothers " 14 February 2012. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/founding-brothers-ellis-joseph-j-founding-54237>

"Founding Brothers Ellis Joseph J Founding Brothers ", 14 February 2012, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/founding-brothers-ellis-joseph-j-founding-54237

Related Documents

From reading this chapter, one can learn that the second half of the eighteenth century was one of turmoil, when people were determined to influence changes on more than one level. While the anti-slavery supporters were determined to have justice, they were powerless in front of the institution, considering that it was responsible for much of the capital flowing into America. Chapter four, "The Farewell," deals with George Washington, his

Ellis holds that America, at its outset, was plagued by an identity crisis: Americans who asserted an essentially 'Republican' identity and revolted against Britain for certain reasons were at ends with Americans who asserted an essentially 'Federal' identity and revolted against Britain for other reasons. In textbooks these are associated with the persons of Jefferson and Hamilton, two of the first cabinet members. They are also associated with Sam Adams,

Revolutionary Generation
PAGES 5 WORDS 2378

Founding Brothers When studying the history of the formation of the United States, one usually thinks in terms of separate events and individuals. However, the American republic was established, instead, by a series of important decisions and the joint efforts of some of the most prominent men of all time. In a matter of ten years, these critical interactions among the eight leading figures of John Adams, Aaron Burr, Benjamin Franklin,

political themes of early American politics, the major players, and issues that arose in the political arena of the time; with specific reference to Samuel Adams: Radical Puritan, by William Fowler, and Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation, by Joseph Ellis. It has 4 sources. The first part of this essay analyzes ideological, historical, personal and administrative features of the first American government, and uses these to explain the 'contradiction' existent