In the United States, the system of employment is known as "at-will employment." The premise of this system is that an employee and an employer engage is an employment contract that can be terminated by either party at any time, regardless of the reason (Standler, 2000). While the doctrine itself rightfully has its critics, it remains a part of the employment law landscape in the United States. Thus, employees who choose to work at Wal-Mart understand that they are doing so only on the basis that they understand the terms of employment and accept those terms. Employees who do not accept Wal-Mart's terms need not work for the company. As such, there can be no reasonable claims of unfairness in Wal-Mart's employment practices -- they are employing people on the same legal basis as every other company in the United States.
Overall, the issues that people have with respect to Wal-Mart's ethics lie largely in either the application of a consequentialist ethics systems or in a general issue with our current economic and legal system. The former is simply unreasonable for our culture, which is based on the rule of law -- that is a deontological ethical system where right and wrong is determined by the actions themselves, rather than their outcomes. The latter is a logical fallacy -- it is not Wal-Mart with whom the complainant has the grievance but rather the system as a whole. Using Wal-Mart as a proxy for the entire economic and legal system is intellectually dishonest.
Works Cited:
Barker, N. (no date). U.S. Trade with China: Expectations vs. reality. PBS Frontline. Retrieved January 15, 2011 from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/walmart/china/trade.html
Bergdahl, M. (no date). Wal-Mart is a company obsessed with lowering costs. Michael Bergdahl.net. Retrieved online, in possession of the author.
FASOnline. (2000). The U.S.-China WTO accession deal. USDA. Retrieved January 15, 2011 from http://www.fas.usda.gov/info/factsheets/China/deal.html
Standler, R. (2000). History of at-will employment law in the U.S.A. RBS2.com. Retrieved January 15, 2011 from http://www.rbs2.com/atwill.htm
According to many sources and the allegations in the class action lawsuit decided in its favor in 2001, Wal-Mart systematically discriminates against women in its management training and promotional practices; it has illegally refused to hire disabled job applicants; it pressures employees not to unionize; and it has knowingly hired illegal aliens by the hundreds (Cram, 2005; Pea, 2011). That class action suit was decided in Wal-Mart's favor strictly on
Business Ethics Palmeri, C&Rupp, L 2013, May 3, Disney Bangladesh Exit Pressure on Clothes makers Who Stay, Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-03/disney-bangladesh-exit-puts-pressure-on-those-who-may-stay-1-.html The work of Palmeri and Rupp (2013) is focused on highlighting the issues faced by the multinational organizations while operating in developing markets. It is highly likely for large organizations to develop their overseas presence. However the economically developing markets a number of issues including environmental, infrastructural, and compliance with health and
The charitable donations that they made also contribute to tax write-offs, so Wal-Mart is not donating at a level where they no longer have incentive -- they benefit from their donations. The donations of employee time amount to little. Wal-Mart has 2 million employees, so the average donation is 1/2-hour per year per employee. The SPI may influence the company's suppliers to strengthen their own CSR, but the program is
It's important to remember that Wal-Mart is a private enterprise and has a responsibilities to investors, shareholders and stakeholders to deliver a profit. All businesses in the end must generate profitable cash flows to survive. The ethicacy of their strategies to avert unionization must be balanced against the fact they are the U.S.' fifth largest employer, have a supply chain that makes it possible for the majority of families with
Lee Scott, the CEO of the company, reacts several times during the film in such corporate PR double-speak that he is difficult to be taken seriously. His comments are in direct opposition to many facts of the Wal-Mart investigation - so much so that he seems like a totally clueless leader or a consummate liar. The facts do not lie in this case, and the director has left them
Employment Discrimination at Wal-Mart Foundation of the Study This study examines the legislative and judicial climate that enables corporations like Wal-Mart to engage in practices that violate workers' rights. The popular consensus is that Wal-Mart, the largest retail store in the United States, displays an inordinate disregard for the human dignity and morale of its employees and, despite continual litigation, continues to blatantly violate the legal rights of its employees. Wal-Mart faces
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now