d.).
In 2012 Joint Commission made quite a few changes to the 2012 accreditation decision rules. These rules present the consistent structure that the Joint Commission uses to deliver an accreditation decision limiting unpredictability or prejudice. The first thing that was changed was that of decision rule PDA06. This changed in that if one is accredited with a decision of contingent, instead of having two occasions to clear the non-compliant standards, an organization now only has one chance. If one does not clear all the standards that lead to their contingent decision then the next step is preliminary denial of accreditation. The next thing that has been changed is that of CONT02. Under this rule in 2011 if one were given an accreditation with follow up status, they had two chances to clear that status. In 2012 this rule changes to allow for only one chance and if an organization is not successful in getting rid of all requirements they will then receive contingent accreditation (2012 Accreditation Decision Rules, 2011).
There is also some good news in the decision rule changes. AFS11 has been done away with and no replacement has been suggested. This was the rule that would place an organization in accreditation with follow up status if it failed in its...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now