Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Ottoman Empire was a sick old man that just collapsed
The Ottoman Empire was perhaps amongst the short-lived glories that history has seen yet. Many scholars believed that the power of the Caliphate ruling over the Empire had started declining from early 1680s; yet, there are also many others who feel that the historical accounts of the Empire show that it was a dynamic and ever-advancing Empire that had an intricate design for political and administrative leadership, which over a period of time brought it decline earlier than necessary (Faroqhi, 2004). In this paper, we will focus on the statement that "the Ottoman Empire was a sick old man that just collapsed" by highlighting some of the strong points as well as weaknesses of the Empire so as to provide support to the statement or negate it.
Perhaps, one of the strengths of the Ottoman Empire was their approach to leadership. They prioritized military strength, geographical expansion, agriculture and conservative property rights to be higher than the advancements...
While many Western researchers believe this to be a weakness, I believe it was one of their primary strengths because they were able to have administrative control that complemented the territories they had conquered i.e. The areas they had conquered followed similar administrative patterns and the Caliphate in the Ottoman Empire merely strengthened this structure and set right its flaws.
Another major strength of the Ottoman Empire was its economic strength and vitality (Deen, 2007). The major reason for this economic strength was the increase in the importance of the port cities and infrastructure like railroads and harbours. This led to the rise of cities and towns in the region as well as the increase in job opportunities and foreign investment from the neighbours as well as the foreign territories that wanted to use the water ways in the area (Deen, 2007).
One of the reasons for the downfall of the Ottoman Empire was its rigidity towards not…
References
Deen, S.M. (2007). Science under Islam: Rise, Decline and Revival. Lulu.
Eldem, E. (2005). "Ottoman financial integration with Europe: foreign loans, the Ottoman Bank and the Ottoman public debt." European Review 13 (3): 431 -- 445.
Faroqhi, Suraiya (2004). The Ottoman Empire and the World Around It. The Library of Ottoman Studies. 7. London I.B. Tauris.
Ottoman Empire In 1683, when the Ottoman forces were besieging Vienna, the empire reached its high-water mark and then began its slow, steady decline after suffering a major defeat in this battle. Only very gradually did Europeans come to perceive it as the Sick Man of Europe, however, since it was still formidable enough to play an important role in the defeat of Russia in the Crimean War of 1854-56. This
Middle East Has the presence of oil in the Middle East had a significant impact on the peoples of non-oil-producing states in the region? If so, in what ways, exactly? Develop an argument with specific reference to AT LEAST TWO non-oil-producing states. and other Western powers, oil supplies are the only real interest in the Middle East, and most people in the region are well aware of this fact, and of
Rise of the Secular Turkish Republic It was in 1923 that the Republic of Turkey appeared on the face of the globe. The Turks consider the preceding years i.e. 1919-1922 as the years of their struggle for independence. The Turkish state that was formed as a consequence of this struggle was a completely new republic despite the fact that various partition schemes were proposed by the triumphant Allies during and after
By the middle of the nineteenth century, the balance of economic strength had shifted entirely to western Europe and especially to Britain and France, which were then passing into the second stage of the industrial revolution that Turkey had hardly begun. The European powers would use their political and economic power to force the empire to allow its economy to be incorporated into the nineteenth-century liberal capitalist system. Free
Great War World War One ultimately killed 35 million people -- this alone might have merited its being called "The Great War," although to a large degree it was the astonishing way in which the deaths happened. On the first day of the Battle of the Somme alone, Britain suffered almost sixty thousand casualties. The ten-month stalemate of the Battle of Verdun resulted in seven hundred thousand (700,000) dead, with no
The world would now be required to accept socialism, Leninism, and eventually Stalinism, as part of the European landscape. With the defeat of Germany, Austro-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire; the shift in the balance of power moved toward the only major participant not devastated on its own soil by war -- the United States. The U.S. grew in economic power after Versailles, assisting not only its former allies in rebuilding,