Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
The three companies selected for this report are eBay, Clorox, and Darden Restaurants. eBay is an online auction website, acting as an intermediary between buyers and sellers. Clorox is described as being a manufacturer and marketer of consumer and institutional cleaning and household products. Some of its brands are the eponymous cleaners, Brita water filters, Burt's Bees and a variety of other brands as well. Darden Restaurants operates casual dining restaurant chains like Oliver Garden, Red Lobster and Longhorn Steakhouse. It has around 1900 restaurants in North America.
eBay's total current assets are $12.6 billion and its total assets are $27.3 billion. The current assets of Clorox are $1.2 billion and the total assets are $4.1 billion. For Darden Restaurants, the company's current assets are $663 million and its total assets are $5.4 billion.
For eBay, the company's current liabilities are $6.7 billion and the total liabilities are $9.3 billion. At Clorox, the current liabilities are $1.3 billion and the total liabilities are $4.2 billion. For Darden Restaurants, the current liabilities are $1.28 billion and the total liabilities are $3.5 billion.
For the latest fiscal year, eBay's total revenue was $11.6 billion. This compares with total revenue for Clorox in its latest fiscal year of $5.2 billion. For Darden Restaurants over this period, total revenue was$7.5 billion.
The "key statistics" page on Yahoo! Finance shows us that the total debt/equity for eBay is 11.66. For Clorox, the total debt/equity is not available, because the company has a negative equity book value. For Darden Restaurants, the total debt/equity is 136.91.
For eBay, the profit margin is 27.72%. The return on assets for eBay is 6.01%. The return on equity for eBay is 19.43%. Clorox has a profit margin of 10.45%. The company has a return on assets of 13.47%. It is impossible to calculate the ROE for Clorox because the company's equity value is negative. Without a denominator, this calculation is impossible. The profit margin at Darden Restaurants is 5.8%. The return on assets is 7.89% and the return on equity is 25.08%.
The beta for eBay is 1.36, indicating that the company's stock is more volatile than the market as a whole. Clorox has a beta of 0.42, and this indicates that the company has a low level of risk compared to the market in general. For Darden, the beta is 0.88, which is closer to the market beta, but shows that the company has a slightly lower risk than the market as a whole.
For financial managers, the decision of debt vs. equity has a number of nuances that must be taken into consideration. The first consideration is cost. Debt financing has a lower cost than does equity financing. One of the reasons for this is that creditors are superordinated relative to shareholders with respect to a firm's cash flows. This can be seen, for example, in the General Motors bankruptcy, where some creditors received at least a little bit of return on their investment, but the equity holders lost everything. With lower risk, the debt holders do not require as much return on their investment as equity holders do. As a result, the cost of debt financing is lower than the cost of equity financing.
Another consideration is control (eNotes, 2012). Creditors protect their investment in a number of ways, but one of the most important ones is through restrictive covenants that banks put on their loans. These may restrict the company by placing limits on the current ratio, the debt/equity ratio or other operating figures. In addition to such controls, debt represents a cash flow obligation that must be met. This means that there is less money left over after making interest and principal payments to re-invest back in the business or to pay out to shareholders in the form of dividends. A company may be forced to forgo investment opportunities because the cash was needed for debt service, so there are times when debt is a restriction in the company's operations, reducing the control that the managers have over the direction of the firm.
A third consideration is that the cost and availability of these forms of financing can vary. Firms cannot always tap the equity markets, so using cash for an investment could result in an increase in debt. Likewise, debt markets may at times be unreceptive to a company, forcing it to find some form of equity capital. However,…[continue]
"Capital Structure The Three Companies Selected For" (2012, March 25) Retrieved October 23, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/capital-structure-the-three-companies-elected-78883
"Capital Structure The Three Companies Selected For" 25 March 2012. Web.23 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/capital-structure-the-three-companies-elected-78883>
"Capital Structure The Three Companies Selected For", 25 March 2012, Accessed.23 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/capital-structure-the-three-companies-elected-78883
The cyclicality of Choice, evidenced by their beta, and the intense competitive pressures, means that the firm is at risk for periods of difficulty. If they are too highly-leveraged, these periods could cause irreparable harm to the company. Ideally, Choice would limit the downside damage caused by the inevitable turbulent times. The medium debt ratio achieves this. The ideal capital structure for Dell Computers is a high debt ratio. Dell's
Capital Structures Essentially, there are really only two ways in which organizations can raise money -- debt or equity. The core of this comes down to cash flow for each type of financing. A debt claim, for instance, allows the holder to a set of cash flow, typically principle and interest; an equity claim entitles the holder to any leftover cash after meeting all other claims. Secondly, debt has prior claim
Capital Structure For a small business, there are two major forms of financing. Debt is when the company borrows money. Debt for small businesses usually comes from a bank, and it often has a fixed schedule of repayments, and there is interest as well. The other form is equity, which is ownership in the business (Parker, 2012). Each has its advantages and disadvantages. Debt is risky, and indeed it increases the
Tax Liability A preview of capital structure issues In regards to the overall business environment, capital structure has profound implications of the business, irrespective of its industry. For one, a firm's capital structure is then the composition or 'structure' of its liabilities. For example, a firm that sells $40 billion in equity and $160 billion in debt is said to be 20% equity-financed and 80% debt-financed. The firm's ratio of debt to
This differs from the more static view taken by Mehrotra. There are a couple of reasons for this key difference. One is that Mehrotra only studied spinoff firms. These firms are easier to study because the managers must choose a capital structure for the new firm. However, this makes for an imperfect survey. Barclay on the other hand has studied a much broader basket of companies. This forced the use
Companies Assessment Finance is one of the most important parts of the business operations of any entity. Financial Management has a great strategic role to play in the future of any firm and it is the financial management and strategies that are in turn implicated on all other departments of the entity. The firm's financial management precisely deals with how the allocation of scarce resources will be done throughout the business.
Approximately 19% of the short-term liabilities in the form of notes payable and other short-term debt. The long-term liabilities consist of long-term debt and other miscellaneous liabilities. The debt portion of this represents approximately 39% of the total long-term liabilities. Johnson & Johnson has issued notes onto the market that mature in 2017, comprising the bulk of the long-term debt. The calculate the market value capital structure of JNJ, we need