Honor Explored In Shakespeare's I Essay

PAGES
5
WORDS
1394
Cite
Related Topics:

iv.82-4). It is also unfortunate that Falstaff is like a father to Hal. He even pokes fun at those that enjoy fighting. An example of this is when he says, "I am not yet of Percy's mind, the Hotspur of the north, he that kills me some six or seven dozen of Scots at a breakfast, washes his hands, and says to his wife, 'Fie upon this quiet life! I want work'" (II.v.94-97). Here he is deliberately pointing out that he is not of the same kind as Hotspur and proud of it. Falstaff is not the kind of person that should be influencing a young man on the threshold of becoming king. Hal, however, is enchanted by him and appears to be missing the mark when it comes to his future. Shakespeare delivers, however, by turning the tables on Hotspur and Hal. Hal eventually reveals a bit of his intelligence in the scene where he was being compared to Hotspur. His transformation convinces his father that he has become the honorable young man the king he hoped he would. To prove his true intentions, he vows to kill Hotspur.

This in the name of God I promise here,

The which if He be pleased I shall perform,

I do beseech Your Majesty may salve

The long-grown wounds of my intemperance.

If not, the end of life cancels all bonds,

And I will die a hundred thousand deaths

Ere break the smallest parcel of this vow. (III.ii.153-9)

From this speech, Hal emerges a new man and begins to acknowledge his place in life. This change also indicates how readers begin to see Hal. He is no longer the lazy kid at the beginning of the play but rather a man driven by honor and what it means to be a man. Our opinion of Hal is not the only thing that has changed. Readers also have a renewed impression of Hotspur by this time in the play. As Hal looks at Hotspur's dead body, he says:

...

(V.iv.88 -- 91)
This scene reveals how far Hal has come in regards to his emotional maturity. We also realize that Hotspur did not die a noble or honorable death.

Hal also demonstrates his capacity for honor when he resolves the conflict at Shrewsbury. This is significant because this strife has carried over since King Henry. After Hal saves his life, the king must look him in a different way. In this scene, all that was before seems to fade away as the king realizes that his son does possess honor. He states, "Thou hast redeemed thy lost opinion, / and showed thou mak'st some tender of my life" (V.iv.47 -- 48). Hal most certainly has redeemed himself and set the future in motion.

Shakespeare brings the notion of honor and what it means to the forefront of this play. He does so by bringing readers' attention to the young and seemingly vapid Hal and the overreaching Hotspur. Both men appear to be something they are not at the beginning of the play and as time goes on, we see that true honor emerges in the lest likely places. The young rivals point out how looks can be deceiving and, in the end, actions do speak louder than words. Hotspur turns out to be more talk than anything. Hal appears to be the lost soul guided by the lazy Falstaff. With such a leader, one would think his future to be dim. Time reveals that we can only truly know a man after time has given him the opportunity to rise to occasions that provide him chances to step out and prove his honor through actions, not words.

Work Cited

Shakespeare, William. I Henry IV. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Vol. I. New York W.W. Norton and Company. 1986.

Sources Used in Documents:

Work Cited

Shakespeare, William. I Henry IV. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Vol. I. New York W.W. Norton and Company. 1986.


Cite this Document:

"Honor Explored In Shakespeare's I" (2009, October 20) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/honor-explored-in-shakespeare-i-18451

"Honor Explored In Shakespeare's I" 20 October 2009. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/honor-explored-in-shakespeare-i-18451>

"Honor Explored In Shakespeare's I", 20 October 2009, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/honor-explored-in-shakespeare-i-18451

Related Documents

Shakespeare's Measure For Measure William Shakespeare's play, Measure for Measure is considered a problem play because it operates on several levels. Shakespeare explores complex matters of ethics in this play through complicated situations and characters. The complexities of the human psyche are explored in this play, with a focus on the emotions of love, shame, and honor. Shakespeare brings these sensitive issues to the surface with the characters and curious behavior

Shakespeare and Blake A prevalent issue in English literature is how social status affects individuals. Two writers that are able to explore the negative aspects of social status are William Shakespeare and William Blake. In Shakespeare's Othello, the Moor of Venice, social status plays a major role in determining who does or does not get promoted within the military; this determination, in turn, leads to rebellion on the part of

Shakespeare's Henry V
PAGES 7 WORDS 2132

Henry the Fifth and the Ideal of a Monarch Shakespeare's history plays are based mostly in fact yet have the insertion of beliefs and systems that where truly his own. In Shakespeare's Henry V can be seen a culmination of his goals of monarchical character development. Though the character King Henry does not always closely resemble his slightly more carefree youth, Prince Hal as seen through the story of his father,

Feminine Evil Depicted in Shakespeare's King Lear and Macbeth William Shakespeare's notoriety for creating memorable characters that are realistic as well as fantastical is demonstrated through his female characters in the tragic plays, King Lear and Macbeth. Shakespeare was obviously considering familial relations and reflecting on how to parents could produce children who are so starkly different from one another when he wrote King Lear. Additionally, by creating the ungracious, self-centered

We actually feel that we are there, one of the spectators, experiencing the story along with Procne and Philomela. Titus lacks these specificities and cultural details. Similarities, however, may be found in other elements. The imagery in both narratives is rich. Both Ovid and Shakespeare have a penchant for enlivening the passages with verbal imagery, particularly in the forms of simile and metaphor. Tamora's praise of the forest alludes to

"It is true that Hamlet dies because he postpones too long the killing of the king. But it is equally true significant that Claudius dies because he postpones too long the killing of Hamlet" (Elliott, 1951). 4. Conclusions Great Britain has produced ones of the greatest writers of all times, with William Shakespeare being the most relevant example to sustain this statement. His Hamlet has been played for years within theaters