Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Breach of Contract Order
Breach of Contract with Smith and the University
A breach of contract has occurred in this situation from a legal standpoint because by law this occurs when a party (like Mr. Smith) fails to carry out, accurately and unerringly his responsibilities, however, in the current situation the negotiations for both sides were made ("Breach of contract," n.d.). For example, when X University replaced their head coach with Smith, consent was made by the official commissioners of the University and guaranteed him that a bare minimum sum of $10,000 would be accessible for basketball scholarships during Smith's first year as a coach for them. In conclusion, on January 7, Smith and X University agreed and signed a hand written agreement where Smith pledged to serve as coach for one year which would start on September 1. The University agreed to pay Smith an income of $14,500, too, and at that time there was no mention made in the deal to the subject of basketball scholarships.
Then on April 2, Smith found out that there would only be $1,000 available for the scholarships for the upcoming school year, therefore, he responded by wanting to cancel the contract on the grounds of fraud because of X University's first promise to at least give $10,000 as a minimum in scholarships. However, when Smith took the contract to court, the court denied him the right to cancel the agreements, and the choice was confirmed on when Smith appealed their decision. Since the decision was not settled for Smith in court he told X University that he still would not carry out his obligations in the contract and he was going to go to work for Y University. Yet before Smith was able to sign a contract with Y University, X University filed an deed looking for a) detailed information of Smith's contract with X University and b) an order to put a stop to Smith from being able to coach basketball at any other university or school.
There should not be any relief made to X University for the simple fact that even though they avoided and blatantly failed to mention the scholarships even though they gave their word that they would offer a minimum of $10,000 yet Smith learned later that there would only be $1,000 available for the entire school year. From the information gathered on both X University and Smith this is a situation for both parties are breaching their contract, and there would be no breach of contract with Smith if X University would have stuck to their word about the basketball scholarships like Smith agreed to work there for one year. Yet, when Smith found out about how the scholarship inquiry was probably only a way to persuade him to sign on to the contract that is when he decided to notify X University Staff and tell them he will not follow through with his of the deal either. This is call renunciation because renunciation takes place when a person/business declines to do what is expected of them in an agreement between them and another party regardless of whether it is spoken or indirect ("Breach of contract," n.d.). This means that even though X University did not mention anymore about the scholarships and how much would be granted at the time Smith signed on, he was aware and was told by the administration of the University that there would be scholarship funds but there was not.
Furthermore, I do not think that X University deserves any relief for the fact that they were guilty of a "Breach of Condition" which is a secondary infringement that happens when a party is looked at as failure to pay as a breach of circumstances, therefore, I feel Smith had a right to terminate his half of the agreement considering the University failed to meet their quota on the amount of scholarship money that was promised ("Breach of contract," n.d.). Since X University has taken Smith to court on the breach of contract, they won in the matter, therefore Smith is still supposed to follow through with his coaching for the year with no scholarship monies and additional support. In issuing an award of damages, the court has found that Smith was in the wrong, so they will either consider the remoteness which is the repercussions of the breach that Smith is lawfully accountable for or the…[continue]
"Legal Remedies" (2011, July 25) Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/legal-remedies-117904
"Legal Remedies" 25 July 2011. Web.28 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/legal-remedies-117904>
"Legal Remedies", 25 July 2011, Accessed.28 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/legal-remedies-117904
Furthermore, Jones will not be entitled to recover damages for mental distress in the amount of $1 Million. Damages for mental distress are generally not appropriate in the context of a contract dispute. Furthermore, damages for mental distress are generally limited to situations where the behavior of one party is extremely outrageous. Due to these limitations, absent information that would lead one to believe that Black engaged in behavior that
Anti-Trust Are investors' legal remedies enough? During the 1990s, a wave of legislation substantially deregulated the financial industry, effectively limiting the ability of investors to seek legal remedies in the wake of corporate fraud, and freeing corporations to take greater risks with 'other people's money.' The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) overturned the protections once provided by the 1934 Securities Exchange Act (Nations 2012). Then-President Clinton vetoed PSLRA, and
legal system in the United States is divided into two distinct systems: federal and state. The state court system in Wisconsin, like most states, has broad jurisdiction so the cases that most ordinary citizens are involved in -- such as robberies, traffic violations, broken contracts, and family disputes -- are usually handled in state courts. The state courts in Wisconsin are not allowed to hear cases where the United
Legal Brief: Hotjox Magazine Facts: Mark Studley (Studley), an Olympic swimmer, was featured on the cover of Hotjox magazine, a magazine targeted primarily at gay males. The picture was in the public domain. The magazine cover had the headline "Olympic Hunks Exposed" and said, "12 Sizzling Centerfolds Ready to Score with You," "Holy Speedo! Hot Athletic Buns!" And "Mark Studley, Olympic 2000's Best Body." The only image of Studley inside the
Issues Presented or Questions of Law: 1) Did the SBL agreement constitute the contract between the parties? 2) Was Plaintiffs' case barred by the parole evidence rule? 3) Should the trial court have sustained Defendants' demurrer to Plaintiffs' case? Holding / Rule of Law: 1) The SBL agreement did not constitute the contract between the parties. The contracts were formed when Plaintiffs accepted Defendants offer and tendered their consideration. Therefore, the SBL agreement and addendum
Legal Precedent for a Situation Gone Wrong Influence of the courts over child custody arrangements in the case of a divorce is low to non-existent. There is a persistent expectation that the parents will come to an agreement about matters related to children, and it is generally not considered beneficial to engage the courts. It is important for disputing married couples to understand that there are three separate issues embedded in
Legal Environment/Total Rewards Resizing organizations must have a good idea of where they want to go and ensure to the best of their ability that they will be able to convince employees that this new direction is desirable for all parties involved. First, organizations need to gather information concerning what psychological contract obligations employees perceive as being most valuable. Probably the best way to do that is to gather feedback from