Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Research Paper:
Balance Sheet Items
Off-Balance Sheet Items
This paper examines off-balance sheet items and their treatment in financial systems analysis. Balance sheets consist of information about a company's assets, liabilities, and owner's equity. Off-balance sheet information is described as any activity a company can engage in but not report on its balance sheet. Frequently these activities relate to liabilities incurred by companies. In some cases companies that attempt to keep information off-balance sheet may do so illegally, intending to present a stronger financial position (Thomason, 2011).
Off-Balance Sheet Accounting
Off-balance sheet accounting is a form of accounting for assets, debts or other financing activities that are not included on a company's main balance sheet. A company's financial wealth is typically determined by the total assets minus total liabilities listed on the balance sheet; if this number is positive, then the company has created financial wealth (Vitez, 2010).
Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) give companies the option of maintaining separate legal entities for accounting and tax purposes. Companies use off balance sheet accounting rules to transfer risk from the parent company to its subsidiaries, thereby protecting its investors, lenders, or other business interests. Subsidiary companies are also used to create new financing for business operations, while at the same time keeping the liability off the parent company's financial statement (Vitez, 2010).
Off-Balance Sheet Financing
Though minimal levels of off-balance sheet activity were acceptable in the past, the growing number of transactions became more of a concern during the 2008 financial crisis. Banks and other financial institutions carried excessive amounts of off-balance sheet financing that hid the risks that these institutions incurred (Thomason, 2011).
Off-balance sheet financing is accomplished by any form of funding that avoids placing owners' equity, liabilities or assets on a firm's balance sheet. Generally speaking, off-balance sheet financing is accomplished by placing those items on some other entity's balance sheet. A standard approach to doing this is for a company to form a special purpose vehicle (SPV) and place assets and liabilities on its balance sheet. An SPV is also called a special purpose entity (SPE), and is a firm or legal entity established to perform some narrowly defined or temporary purpose. The sponsoring firm accomplishes that purpose without having to carry the associated assets or liabilities on its own balance sheet; it achieves its purpose off the balance sheet (Holton, 2005).
The sponsoring firm typically takes only a partial ownership position or no ownership interest in the SPV whatsoever. SPVs are used in a variety of transactions, including leasing, project finance, and securitizations. SPVs can take various legal forms, including corporations, U.S.-style trusts or partnerships (Holton, 2005).
Off-balance sheet financing offers advantages from a risk management standpoint. When assets and liabilities are moved from one balance sheet to another, the risks associated with those assets and liabilities go with them to the other balance sheet. Therefore, if a firm transfers credit-risky assets to an SPV, the credit risk goes with those assets (Holton, 2005).
Off-balance sheet financing offers considerable flexibility. An SPV does not use the sponsoring firm's credit lines or other financing channels; instead it is presented to financiers as a stand-alone entity with its own risk-reward characteristics. It can issue its own debt or establish its own lines of credit (Holton, 2005).
Off-balance sheet financing is often used as a means of asset-liability management; if assets and liabilities are never placed on the balance sheet, then they do not have to be matched. SPVs can also be used in tax avoidance. Banks use off-balance sheet financing to achieve reductions in their regulatory capital requirements. While SPVs and off-balance sheet financing can have legitimate purposes, they can also be used to misrepresent a firm's financial condition. Prior to its bankruptcy, Enron created numerous SPVs which they used to hide billions of dollars in debt. As a result of that abuse and other scandals during 2001-2002, laws, regulations and accounting rules were tightened (Holton, 2005).
Off-Balance Sheet Leases
Off-balance sheet leases can be used as a means to shift debt off a company's balance sheet. Not to be confused with a capital lease, which is treated like a purchase and shows up on the company's balance sheet, an operating lease transaction allows the lessor to retain ownership of the leased asset. Operating lease payments appear as operating expenses for the company using a lease to purchase the asset. This arrangement allows a company to keep substantial liabilities from plain sight (McClure,…[continue]
"Off Balance Sheet Items" (2011, April 08) Retrieved December 6, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/off-balance-sheet-items-120084
"Off Balance Sheet Items" 08 April 2011. Web.6 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/off-balance-sheet-items-120084>
"Off Balance Sheet Items", 08 April 2011, Accessed.6 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/off-balance-sheet-items-120084
This indicates that none is capable of outperforming the market with the use of something that 'that everybody else knows'. Still there exists a number of financial analysis those study the past trend of stock prices and the trend in trading volume as an effort to generate profit. Such technical analysis is viewed by Efficient Market Hypothesis as not effective in forecasting the variations in the fluctuations of future
Apple and Philips Balance Sheet Analysis This text examines the balance sheets of both Apple and Philips in greater detail. Amongst other things, the paper will identify a number of differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as far as valuation approaches are concerned. Further, in addition to discussing a number of balance sheet items, the paper will also highlight the main differences between the balance sheets of the two companies. Valuation Differences:
STI vs. USB The capital accounts for the two banks reveal a significant difference in the price-to-book ratios. Suntrust Banks has an equity value that is higher than the market cap of the company, a favorable price-to-book ratio that implies the company is undervalued on the market. U.S. Bancorp has a more typical price-to-book ratio where the market value of the firm is higher than the book value. Part of this
The data must be absolutely correct. 3. Effects of Price Level Changes: Price levels changes often make the comparison of figures difficult over a period of time. Changes in price affect the cost of production, sales and also the value of the assets. Therefore, it is necessary to make proper adjustment for price-level changes before any comparison. 4. Quality factors are ignored: Ratio analysis is a technique of quantitative analysis and
Successful supply chain strategies will consider many factors besides price; such as quality, reliability, stability, how well their technology integrates as well as plethora of other strategic considerations. Therefore since many of these factors are intangible in nature it is hard to quantify and contrast alternate supply chain possibilities. For example, if a low cost leader supplier isn't able to meet deadlines consistently then the costs associated with the
4. If Enron shareholders had been fully aware of the LJM partnership agreement, do you believe they would have been willing to continue investing in Enron? LJM was created by Fastow allegedly to buy poorly performing Enron assets, but in reality to hide debt and inflate profits of Enron in order to leverage its stock price. It is almost certain that Enron shareholders would have ceased to continue investing in Enron
internal auditor, the external auditor and the CFO. The essay also reviews their respective responsibilities, inherent conflicts between them and ethical considerations for each. Finally the essay reviews the treatment of balance sheet items from the perspective of each position. The internal auditor typically reports to the CFO and is responsible for reviewing work done by fellow employees, checking for errors, oversights and irregularities. The standard method used to conduct