Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
This is seen the verse "Thou know'st that this cannot be said A sin, nor shame, nor loss of maidenhead" (Donne). Unfortunately for the seducer, the flea has succeded where he failed. The social conventions of marriage and consumation are symbolized by it in the verse where Donne speaks of marriage bed and marriage temple." The killing of the flea would be like killing his lover and symbolizes the shortness of life and the immediacy and importance of finding love above all else (ibid.).
On the surface of it all, the Marvell poem appears to expound the concept of seizing the moment, however in that the works are different in that Donne is using an animal metaphor while Marvell is using that of a coy mistress instead (Donne and Marvell). Also, the Marvell work is a warning to the lady against the inflated flattery men use to seduce and bed women. While on the surface it seems similar, this is a very different purpose. The male makes fun of the female coyness and shyness noting that it is a pretense and that men can play...
By analyzing Andrew Marvell's "To His Coy Mistress" and John Donne's "The Flea "While, the best examples of the representative poetry were considered. On the surface the poets seem to share many similarities, a deeper analysis revealed important differences as the Donne work was encouraging the woman to give into the seduction while the Marvell poem was lampooning and therefore downplaying it.
References
Donne, John. "The Flea." Luminarium.org. Luminarium, 03 Sept 2003. Web. 20
Jun 2011. <http://www.luminarium.org/sevenlit/donne/flea.php>.
"John Donne's "The Flea" and Andrew Marvell's "to His Coy Mistress": Seduction
Poetry at Its Finest ." VCCS Litonline . VCCS, 2011. Web. 20 Jun 2011.
<http://www.luminarium.org/sevenlit/marvell/coy.htm>.
The Holy Sonnet 'Death be not Proud' (Complete Poetry 283-4) seems to show Donne's mind grappling anew with the reality of death in the wake of his wife's demise. The form of the poem gives an impression of thinking aloud, as if the reader overhears the poet's thoughts as he engages directly with death in an attempt both to cut it down to size and to understand its true nature
She is to remain quiet and calm, trusting the necessity and inevitability of the speaker's leaving. The second and third strong images in the poem concern the love connection between the couple. The poet uses gold as a metaphor for the pliability and expanding properties of the couple's love. When gold is beaten, it bends and expands; it does not break. In the same way, the love between the man
" (Lines 5-7) the metaphor of the poet being like a battered and invaded town that is impinged upon by outsiders yet still strives to let in the saving forces suggests both a medieval castle and the poet's divided alliances between the world (evil) and God (good). The second half of the poem creates further parallels the relationship of the poet to God. The next metaphor, after the castle, suggests that
The conceit or metaphor in extended though an image of the world or globe. The tears become the entire world which encompasses the speaker's life and feelings. So doth each tear, Which thee doth wear, globe, yea world, by that impression grow, (Lines 14-16) This comparison also leads to the insistence in the poem that without each other the two lovers in fact cease to exist and that their essential meaning is
John Donne's "The Canonization" begins relatively simply, as a familiar lyrical ode to his mistress. Gradually it deepens in meaning while approaching the final verses, where Donne reveals the true complexity of his vision of love. "The Canonization" is undoubtedly still a love poem; it revels in theatrical descriptions of the love he and his beloved share. But there are also many layers of meaning and irony behind the words
The poem emotionally appealing and with such invigorating language, is easily translatable as a sermon. The reader could easily manipulate the tone of the poem with slight incensed articulation by accenting the poem as horrifying, delightful, spiritually persuasive or even amusing tone. Throughout the reading of this sonnet, despite its recognition towards God, the sonnet still mimics the consistency Donne always had in his poetry. Consider the plethora of