Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Reasoning Aptitude Results
Reasoning Aptitude
When the tests are detailed yet afford some flexibility in the answers, I often find aptitude tests quite revealing and useful. With respect to my Reasoning Aptitude Results, I have a similar sentiment: these results where revealing, useful, and articulate aspects of myself that both I knew, and were a surprise to me.
Concerning my individual thinking style, it is apparent that I am a proactive thinker. I am thinking ahead. I have the ability to receive and interpret instructions and think about the entire process of a task. I am a person that troubleshoots. I look for aspects of the task or process that might give me trouble, or might present trouble for my group, and other scenarios. I am not afraid to approach or duly challenge authority figures with respect to the work. I liked the aspect of my results that states that I do not unduly challenge authority. To me this meant, I respect authority figures, but when there are those occasional or rare moments when authority should be challenged, I am the type of person that is not afraid to step up to the plate, and ask a question or make a comment...
I already mentioned how I have the capacity to think ahead, but according to the results, I also demonstrate the ability to think about a situation, task, or service from the perspective of many people. I can consider a service from the perspective of the customer, which would at least partially explain why I scored well with regard to customer service. I obviously have the ability to consider a situation from the perspective of the employee or worker, and I have the ability to see a situation from the perspective of an authority figure. This gives me some solace in that when I have a question or perform a task, there is considerable thought that goes into what I am doing. This gives me confidence in my professional future because these are skills that are marketable and profitable. Strong businesses, companies, and organizations often value these types of traits and the ability to see a situation from various perspectives.
The information regarding my Competencies and Work Culture Preferences are extremely valuable to me and…
References:
Institute of Psychometric Testing. (2013). How your numerical score is interpreted. Psychometric Institute, Web, Available from: http://www.psychometricinstitute.com.au/Psychometric-Test-Guide/Numerical-Reasoning-Test-Guide/How_your_numerical_score_is_interpreted.html. 2013 June 28.
Aptitude One of the concerns in assessing general intelligence is that there is an over-emphasis upon verbal intelligence. Even if the test is not specifically a verbal IQ test, this is a concern given that fluency in the English language (and the type of English used by the test designer) may impact the test-taker's ability to interpret the instructions. The purpose of the Cultural Fair IQ test is to distill
According to the authors, this can be done if employees are given a sense of importance in the organizations. Knowledge workers are already short in supplies and most competing rivals also compete to get the best human resource in terms of knowledge workers. It is therefore essential for any organization to retain this highly skilled part of their workforce and in order to do that organizations must eliminate the
Harmonic Accompaniment on the Development of Music Aptitude and Singing Achievement The rationale of the scrutinize was to investigate the effect of xylophones harmonic accompaniment on the tone realization and tone improvisation of young children[aged eight].It provide the children cognitive development, multiple intelligence emphasis on music and bodily kinesthetic intelligence which will involve auditory, visual and kinesthetic stimuli. It entails rhythmic development, music amptitude which test the effect of harmonic accompaniment
Used in a variety of professional settings including educational and human resources contexts, aptitude and achievement tests can seem similar. Both are standardized assessments that measure performance on specific parameters, and both are frequently administered within group settings such as the workplace or school. The main difference between aptitude and achievement tests is that the latter assesses mastery of a specific lesson or course. For example, standardized achievement tests are
Chess and Cognitive Ability Revision Does Chess Enhance Cognitive Ability? PSYC 317, Fall 2012 Psychologists and cognitive researchers have long suspected a link between the ability to play chess proficiently and superior intelligence levels. By conducting a thorough review of the prevailing research concerning chess and the enhancement of cognitive abilities, as well as studies which fail to establish conclusive links between the two, it is possible to form a more fully informed
The trainer will then focus on the steps to be taken to develop new skills. For example, if the trainer wants to talk about motivating, leading, negotiating, selling or speaking, it is best to start with what the learners do well before showing some chart on Maslow's theory, Posner's leadership practices, or selling skills from some standard package that has been develop elsewhere. Many foreign trainers make grave errors