Risk Analysis Capital Budgeting Risk Analysis In Essay

Risk Analysis Capital Budgeting Risk Analysis in Capital Budgeting

Capital budgeting entails making various decisions in the management of an organization with the aim of determining expenditures on assets. In most cases, these particular expenditures are those that the management expects that their cash flow might extend within a period of about one year. Capital budgeting is a significant process in the management of an organization because it acts a control tool. This is because all capital expenditures that an organization expects to inquire within a certain period require large investments. However, most of these expenditures tend to be limited by availability of funds. Capital budgeting plays a significant role in influencing an organization's ability to achieve the set financial goals.

Capital budgeting and Risks

There is always a possibility of an organization to experience various uncertainties especially if the management fails to recognize the outcome of an event when dealing with assets. The element of risk occurrence is high especially when the assets have a cash flow that extends a period of more than one year. In order to curb the occurrence of various risks, the management of an organization needs to have the recommendable knowledge on the evaluations of the most expected risks (Baker & English, 2011). This means that the management ought to have the propensity to recognize and comprehend various uncertainties that might be surrounding key variables related to the expenditures. Moreover, the management ought to have the recommended tools and methodology in order to be able to process its risks implications. The management of an organization has the obligation of reflecting various risks that tend to be an obstacle in achieving financial objectives (Jackson, 2008). The most common types of risks that are separate and distinct include the following:

Stand-alone Risk

This refers to a type...

...

The management can, therefore, be able to develop various ideas related to a projects future cash flow. Moreover, the management can, therefore, be able to identify a number of objective probabilities associated with future cash flows. When the management of an organization manages to identify both of the above ideas, it can, therefore, be able to develop various measures of the project risks (Ehrhardt & Brigham, 2010). Stand-alone risks entail the approach where the management is able to measure the projects risks while being able to isolate all other projects related to the expenditure. In stand-alone risks, each stakeholder related to the operations of an organization tends to hold the only one stock that ought to be on risk in his/her portfolio. Moreover, stand-alone risks may occur in a situation where the organization has only the asset that is at risk. One of the significant characteristics of stand-alone risks is that it is based on various uncertainties that the management expects might emerge in relation to the project's cash flow. Another significant characteristic of stand-alone risk is that it fails to accept any of the diversifications that might be made by the organization itself or the stakeholders (Ehrhardt & Brigham, 2010). There is a possibility of management in an organization to identify the project's stand-alone risks. This can be done by evaluating the future cash flow of the project being addressed. Stand-alone risk is the easiest to measure compared with other type of risks that an organization may incur through a project's cash flows.
Within Firm Risks

This type of risks is also referred to as corporate risks (Ehrhardt & Brigham, 2010). The risk is associated with various operations of the organization itself. The management is able to make various diversifications in relation to the organization's risk. This is because this type…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Baker, H.K., & English, P. (2011). Capital budgeting valuation: Financial analysis for today's investment projects. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.

Brigham, E.F., Garpenski, L.C., & Daves, P.R. (2010). Intermediate financial management. Mason, OH: South-Western.

Ehrhardt, M.C., & Brigham, E.F. (2010). Corporate finance: A focus approach. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

Jackson, J. (2008). Energy Budgets at Risk (EBaR): A risk management approach to energy purchase and efficiency choices. Hoboken: J. Wiley & Sons.


Cite this Document:

"Risk Analysis Capital Budgeting Risk Analysis In" (2012, March 12) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/risk-analysis-capital-budgeting-risk-analysis-78519

"Risk Analysis Capital Budgeting Risk Analysis In" 12 March 2012. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/risk-analysis-capital-budgeting-risk-analysis-78519>

"Risk Analysis Capital Budgeting Risk Analysis In", 12 March 2012, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/risk-analysis-capital-budgeting-risk-analysis-78519

Related Documents

Capital Budgeting and Government Regulations Airline Industry LONG-TERM CAPITAL BUDGETING IN AIRLINE INDUSTRY Government regulation: Why or why not Major reasons for government involvement in a market economy Interests of stockholders and managers: The convergence Airline: Merger or new capital investment LONG-TERM CAPITAL BUDGETING IN AIRLINE INDUSTRY For profit organizations have shareholder's profit maximization as the main aim to pursue. Traditional managerial economics expects that all projects/investments having positive net present value (NPV) shall be initiated by

Litzenberger and Joy (1975) note that in a decentralized system, quantitative measures are more common for evaluating projects, but they also note that for larger projects there is some degree of centralization. This is the case with Stryker, where the most substantial projects are approved by the Board of Directors. Ang (1986) notes, however, that there can be agency problems where the interests of the division are misaligned with the

Generally speaking, the higher a project's internal rate of return, the more desirable it is to undertake the project. As such, IRR can be used to rank several prospective projects a firm is considering. Assuming all other factors are equal among the various projects, the project with the highest IRR would probably be considered the best and undertaken first." The equation to calculating the internal rate of return is a

1 0.107 0.107 1.788005 4.37% 7.24% D 20 Lev 1.2925 0.120475 0.11038 1.653411 4.05% 7.22% D 50 Lev 1.87 0.1609 0.16045 -0.1731 -0.44% 7.05% 5. The only project that is unacceptable is Project D. At the 50% leverage level. This has a negative NPV. The other projects at each leverage level all have positive net present values. The following graph shows the NPVs for the different projects: 6. My objective in making this decision is to maximize firm value. The projects are mutually exclusive. I would use NPV as the main

When a range of options are presented to management, the capital budgeting process must be used to determine the costs and cash flows associated with each option. However, the capital budgeting process is only as valuable as the inputs and assumptions. If the assumptions are not grounded in reasonable analysis and quality research, the process will not yield a valuable result. If the numbers that are input into the

Capital Budgeting is a vital part of any business. Investment decisions, which need time to mature, must be based on the returns that they will make. If investment in a project is unprofitable in the long run, it would be unwise to invest in it. However, if the investment will be profitable, it is important to determine this early in the game. Because huge sums of money can be lost if