Disaster Mitigation Act Of 2000, Term Paper

PAGES
1
WORDS
312
Cite
Related Topics:

¶ … Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, reinforces the importance of pre-disaster infrastructure mitigation planning to reduce disaster losses nationwide, and is aimed primarily at the control and streamlining of the administration of federal disaster relief and programs to promote mitigation activities, some of the provisions that the Act implements are as follows. Funding for pre-disaster mitigation activities, developing experimental multi-hazard maps to better understand risk, establishing state and local government infrastructure mitigation planning requirements, defining how states can assume more responsibility in managing the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), adjusting ways in which management costs for projects are funded.(North Carolina Division of Emergency Management [NCDEM], 2000)

This act encourages counties to ensure that a proper plan is in place. If a proper plan is not in place, there are consequences. Among the consequences for failure to adhere and comply with developing an infrastructure mitigation plan is a possible reduction in damage assistance from 75% to 25% by the federal government; if the facility has been damaged on more than a single occasion in the preceding ten-year period by the same type of event. (NCDEM, 2000)

Due to the Act North Carolina implemented a program known, as Advance Infrastructure Mitigation (AIM).It is a program designed to assist North Carolina's counties develop an infrastructure mitigation plan. This plan is now a requirement for counties following adoption of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 by Congress and Senate Bill 300 an Act to Amend the Laws Regarding Emergency Management, by the North Carolina General Assembly. (NCDEM, 2000)

This act helped insure that everyone is making viable efforts towards having emergency plans in place, by implement consequences for failure to comply with these regulations gives further support, and stresses the importance of having a current plan in place.

Reference

North Carolina Division of Emergency Management (2000). Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. Retrieved June 16, 2007, at http://www.dem.dcc.state.nc.us/PA/dma_2000_detail.htm

Cite this Document:

"Disaster Mitigation Act Of 2000 " (2007, June 17) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/disaster-mitigation-act-of-2000-37136

"Disaster Mitigation Act Of 2000 " 17 June 2007. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/disaster-mitigation-act-of-2000-37136>

"Disaster Mitigation Act Of 2000 ", 17 June 2007, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/disaster-mitigation-act-of-2000-37136

Related Documents

A b) Event management People react differently when faced with disaster, some may respond and follow the disaster response plan without a problem, other may forget key instructions and follow their own plans, the most dangerous situations however, are when individuals freeze and fail to act when disaster strikes. Response before, during and after a disaster can be the difference between life and death. (Bridegan et al., 1997) Failure to heed

Louis Bay and Biloxi with approximately 12,500 homes sustaining extensive or catastrophic damage. (Moody, 2004) Homes in the New Orleans area were instantly washed away as the dikes in town broke explosively when the storm hit. Those most affected as in South Africa were those living in poverty in very poorly constructed homes. III. FINDINGS of RISK ASSESSMENT This brief yet critical assessment conducted in a comparative of South Africa and

Emergency Management Disasters are political occurrences; they can either destroy or glorify politicians. The spectacular temperament of disasters calls for the involvement of these chief executives and they test their leadership merits. How politicians control these rare occurrences can frame how their whole term in office receive judgments. During his last White House Press Conference, President George W. Bush was asked about the mistake he made during his reign, and among

Organizational Accountability Review of Taiwan's Disaster Management Activities In Response To Typhoon Morakot Taiwanese System of Government 174 Responsibility of Emergency Management in Taiwan 175 Disasters in Taiwan 175 Citizen Participation 189 Shafritz defines citizen participation as follows: 192 Public Managers, Citizen Participation, and Decision Making 192 The Importance of Citizen Participation 197 Models of Citizen Participation 199 Citizen Participation Dilemmas 205 Accountability 207 Definitions of Accountability 207 The Meaning of Accountability 208 The Functions of Accountability 213 Citizen Participation and Accountability 216 Accountability Overloads

Technology and Disaster
PAGES 5 WORDS 1782

role that technology has played in terms of the genocide in Rwanda, both before and after. With the scope and depth of technology, there is an ability to make natural disasters seem even worse -- worse in the sense that a degree of sensationalism can develop, making the incident seem more pervasive and more damaging. One of the major ways that technology has impacted the manner in which we consume

S. DHS "Strategic Plan," 2008, http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/strategicplan/) Realistically acts of terrorism, domestic or foreign are exceedingly rare, though slightly more common than they have been in the past and at least marginally more violent in nature, they occur very, very rarely. (Lewis, 2000, p. 201) Though maintaining serious preparedness the mitigation of natural disasters, most which cannot be avoided is an issue needed to be addressed almost yearly, on both small