U.S. Adoption Of IFRS The Article Review

PAGES
5
WORDS
1850
Cite

Lastly, to support the article regarding Should U.S. Adopt IFRS? Khorana (2010) uses a study that involved utilizing 44 nations from the similar U.S. investment information that has been set as the one used in Khuran's study, Gordon and Shima (2010) display that U.S. stockholders deal more of their impartiality reserves in nations after adoption of IFRS and that the asset increase is related with the nation's lawful morals and implementation administration. Likewise, Amiram (2009) combines all speculation data, not just recognized and large custodial properties, from the International Financial Fund for 53 stockholder and 81 investee nations. He discovers augmented foreign equity assets about mandatory IFRS adoption and that the growth is superior for nations that do have corruption that is not as high and improved depositor shield.

In conclusion, in this paper, I think that the article has done a superb job to support its argument regarding the notion if IFRS should be used in the United States. The article has provided proof that U.S. home...

...

The article also gave information that showed that the decrease in the U.S. home bias that happens after the mandatory adoption of IFRS is much healthier for nations with superior variances among IFRS and their domestic accounting criterions, and for nations with a firmer decree of law (Khurana, 2010). Further, the article, states that these consequences propose that U.S. depositors respect the implementation of criterions in a nation instructing IFRS adoption as a significant issue in creating assets outside the U.S. Therefore, it should not be a problem with adopting IFRS for the United States.
Works Cited

Anderson a & Nkansah, O. (2011). Should U.S. Adopt IFRS? Financial Executive, 27(7), 24-28.

Khurana, I. & . (2010). Mandatory IFRS Adoption and the U.S. Home Bias. Accounting Horizons, 25(4), 729-753.

Sun, J.C. (2010). How Would the Mandatory Adoption of IFRS Affect the Earnungs Quality of U.S. Firms in the U.S. Accounting, 25(4), 837-860.

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Anderson a & Nkansah, O. (2011). Should U.S. Adopt IFRS? Financial Executive, 27(7), 24-28.

Khurana, I. & . (2010). Mandatory IFRS Adoption and the U.S. Home Bias. Accounting Horizons, 25(4), 729-753.

Sun, J.C. (2010). How Would the Mandatory Adoption of IFRS Affect the Earnungs Quality of U.S. Firms in the U.S. Accounting, 25(4), 837-860.


Cite this Document:

"U S Adoption Of IFRS The" (2012, February 24) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-adoption-of-ifrs-the-54521

"U S Adoption Of IFRS The" 24 February 2012. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-adoption-of-ifrs-the-54521>

"U S Adoption Of IFRS The", 24 February 2012, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-adoption-of-ifrs-the-54521

Related Documents

S. listing. Present Status: A lot of nations are moving on to IFRS in the wake of the regulatory developments for adopting the same. The Security and Exchange Commission -- SEC's non-requirement of foreign firms reporting under IFRS to deposit reconciliation to the U.S. GAAP is also facilitating the process. The SEC concurrently is also actively examining the possibility whether to allow, or maybe sooner or later need, some or all companies

IFRS GAAP Convergence
PAGES 3 WORDS 1031

Herz (2013) notes that the end of convergence will essentially bring about an era where IFRS is, for the most part, the de facto standard around the world. However, the process has also compelled the IASB to be more responsive to its constituents. For Australians, involvement in ASAF signals the beginning of the final stages of convergence, where the remaining non-IFRS major economies are brought into the process. Many countries with

In other words, with respect to the dilemma between IFRS and U.S. GAAP, the view provided by the article is that recent changes have actually manifested a far more intensive process of oversight in the latter than is proposed by the former. To the point, Ramanna & Cheng report that "despite the attempts at convergence, as of 2005, significant differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS remained. The differences were due

" IFRS has an entirely different approach, focusing on objectives, and also encourages the use of "illustrative examples relating to specific events and transactions." The GAAP system is therefore significantly more robust. There are also differences between the systems with respect to the valuation of inventories, where GAAP permits LIFO and IFRS does not. IFRS also insists that "all inventories having a similar nature" are valued using the same formula, something

IFRS and GAAP Convergence
PAGES 6 WORDS 2041

IFRS and GAAP Convergence Briefly describe Walmart The company establishment was in 1962 by Sam Walton. The company has grown through mergers and acquisitions to become the largest retail outlet in the globe. The main business of the company is corporate retail. The retailer offers a variety of products to its customers at a lower price compared to its competition. According to Fortune 500 ratings, the corporation ranks third among the largest

IFRS Human Resource Accounting The United States has a radically different accounting system than virtually every other the countries considered. The United States has their own system known as the general accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Other countries have used this system in the past, such as the UK and Germany, but there has been an international standard that has developed over the course of the last few years and virtually every other