Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Given the fact that you will be dealing with people who will not share the same values, means that you must be prepared to go to the same level as them (especially during times of emergency). In this aspect, breaking the various constraints is justified as it is creating the most positive benefit for the group. (Nagel 168 -- 188)
The different constraints are not considered to be an illusion. This is because the authority that an entity will have over society; will depend upon if there is an emergency that is being faced. During times when this is occurring, these constraints will shift, as they must adjust to the different realities. Once the objective of achieving the greatest amount of good has been accomplished, is when the previous constraints will become standard values in society. Where, the underlying nature of the threat has been mitigated. (Shaw)
There are a number of different critics, who will claim that consquentialism is taking a general approach when examining life. As consquentialists are using the greatest amount of good, to help as many people as possible. In this aspect, critics will often argue that there are some situations, where someone will inevitably loose. Once this takes place, it means that you are working counterproductively against the theory's objectives. ("Consequentialism") In this case, critics are missing the point of consquentialism, which is to choose the least amount of damage, to have the greatest effect on everyone. This is important, because...
The reason why is because, a part of the theory is helping one another to achieve the greatest amount of good. As a result, the benefits that group would receive could be used in the future to help the individual. At which point, they are no longer losing. Instead, a win -- win situation has been created for everyone. This is what makes the theory of consequentialism superior to others. As it will seek to find the most positive solutions for the various challenges everyone must deal with.
Clearly, consequentialism is having a profound impact upon deontological theory. As it is establishing possible situations, where, the most positive results can be achieved. Where, theory allows for individuals to be able to move away from deontological constraints, based upon changes in the real world. In many ways, one could argue that this is what makes the consequential theory superior to others. Where, it will provide everyone with a standard for living their lives and adjusting for changes that are occurring, so that the greatest amounts of good can be achieved.
Bibliography
Consequentialism. Stanford University, 2006. Web. 15 Oct. 2010.
Nagel, Thomas. "Ethics." The View from Nowhere. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, n.d.. 164 -- 188
Shaw, William. The Consequentialist Perspective, n.d.
MLA Format http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/
Bibliography
Consequentialism. Stanford University, 2006. Web. 15 Oct. 2010. <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism/#ArgCon>
Nagel, Thomas. "Ethics." The View from Nowhere. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, n.d.. 164 -- 188
Shaw, William. The Consequentialist Perspective, n.d.
MLA Format http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/
he also felt that it was the only way a society could achieve law and order. Furthermore he states that the person who rules the state must be a person of great power and can be beneficial for eveyrone. He compares this to the founder of sparta and athens, who created the consitution themselves. Aristotle observed that those men were the cause of great benefits for their city. If
Authority and Leadership in Germany "This book is to be neither an accusation nor a confession, and least of all an adventure, for death is not an adventure to those who stand face-to-face with it. It will try simply to tell of a generation of men who, even though they may have escaped shells, were destroyed by the war." ~ Remarque, All Quite on the Western Front. Germany in the time preceding
authority and legitimacy, leadership and trust in All Quiet on the Western Front and Survival in Auschwitz All Quiet on the Western Front" by Remarque and "Survival in Auschwitz" by Primo Levi are two novels that due share some things that are in common because they are both war novels. For example, the novel All Quiet on the Western Front depicts the battle of the Germans during World War I.
Therefore, in order to protect itself from charges of discrimination in the interview process, the employer first needs to ensure that whoever is doing the interviewing does not engage in any type of overtly discriminatory behavior. While this may seem self-explanatory, the reality is that every single person carries with them a set of stereotypes and prejudices, and, without appropriate training, may not even be aware when they are relying
Furthermore, he believed any attempt to level out these differences are authoritative for Christian thought (Bright and Kelsey 1967). Along with that, it is clear that he believed that the differences are very difficult to figure out, which may explain why his thesis was unclear. We shall never hear the Old Testament's word rightly unless we are willing to hear it all. That is to say, we must hear it
He also feels as though authority is contextual in that it is something people learn to respect and wield differently in different environments and social realities (Burger, 2009). This is to say that the Milgram studies were snapshots of a very specific culture and time period, as Blass suggests, and that they may not represent the ultimate knowledge of the concepts of obedience and authority as many researchers and