Riordan Compliance Plan
Compliance Plan for Riordan Corporation
Compliance Plan for Riordan Manufacturing
Riordan Manufacturing is a plastic design and manufacturing enterprise that is based at San Jose, CA. It is classified amongst Fortune 100 enterprises with its $1 billion worth of capital base. The company has been on expansionary mission, which has led to other branches being opened at Albany, Pontiac, and Hangzhou in China. In addition, the amount of transactions carried out through e-commerce has almost doubled in a span of less than two years. As such, the management discovered the necessity to initiate an enterprise risk management (ERM) program as part of the strategy to take care of the uncertainties; also assured stakeholders of the value in their investments. Consequently, the company's management reached a consensus to implement ERM basing on the internationally acclimated guidelines offered by a Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
The COSO design was the most preferred approach as it is particularly explicit in defining actions that promote management responsibilities, employees' rights, and legal risks through advocacy for dispute management responsibilities
Management Responsibility
The company embraces sigma management strategy. The Board of Directors is charged with the duty of overseeing the general management of Riordan business activities by complying with the state corporation requirements, Articles of Incorporation, as well as its Bylaws. In addition, under the corporate governance plan of the company, the Board of Directors is responsible for maintaining nominating committee, executive and auditing committees. Nominating committee oversees the competencies and skills of the Board members, supervise the Board and recommends new Board members.
The term compliance can be viewed from two distinct perspectives. First, it can be regarded as acting in accordance to the well-prescribed and established laws or guidelines. On the other hand, one might understand as the process of becoming compliant with the legislation and guidelines in place. The presence of corporate management plan is essential in managing the day-to-day activities of the business. However, in order to solve and tackle future issues in the organization, there is an urgent need for incorporation of corporate compliance plan. The plan will serve as a guide on handling legal liabilities such as a violation of the laws, enterprise liability, real, and intellectual property and governance principles of regulatory compliance requirements
In order to mitigate risks and liabilities while deriving maximum benefits from contractual opportunities, the contract must be clear and concise. Ambiguity should not be tolerated, and both parties have the duty to be reasonable and act in utmost good faith. The negotiating parties reserve the responsibility of sticking to the provisions in the contract to eliminate cases of breaching the contract. However, in case one of the parties intentionally or circumstantially breaches the contract, the company should use one of the following ways to resolve the dispute. They include negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and litigation. The method chosen will solely depend on the individual parties' willingness to engage in the dispute resolution process. Nevertheless, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) must always be given pre-eminence. ADR comprises of negotiation, mediation, or arbitration. Litigation should be used as a last resort because it is complex, time-consuming, and involves a lot of bureaucracy with the judicial system.
Directors' and Officers' Liability
The directors and officers at Riordan Corporation have the duty to uphold due diligence in the manner they conduct the activities of the business. It is mandatory that they act in utmost good faith while prioritizing the best interest of the organization
. Directors of this corporation are expected to comply fully with the following three basic responsibilities:
1. Duty of Diligence: also referred to as Duty of Care: in this case, each director or rather office holder must act in utmost good faith while giving the best interest of the organization pre-eminence
2. Duty of Loyalty: It is the duty of each director to consider the interest of the organization first before ones' own interests
3. Duty of...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now