Brown, and commit that "best efforts" will be exerted to ensure that his request will be addressed and resolved (whether this would be a positive or negative outcome). These tactics would help me establish my objective, which is to ensure the success of the agreement while ensuring also that Gov. Brown does not feel that his concerns were not addressed and there was not even an attempt to help him resolve the matter. The agreement template has helped me evaluate the flow of the negotiation process that happened in this particular case. Taking into account the structure and elements of the agreement template, I was able to identify that the negotiations in this case lacked the 'renegotiation' component, which takes into account the possibility of another negotiation during or after agreement...

Through the agreement template, I was able to determine this weakness and consequently, develop the tactics that are proposed to be used for this case.
A key ideological issue in this case is Gov. Brown's argument that instead of the government doling out money to support the teaching hospital, the unissued $12 M. bonds must be used instead for this purpose. Since this issue has been buried over time, and was not actively brought up during the negotiation process, this was never considered as part of the finalized agreement. But, as explained earlier, Gov. Brown's argument has merit and must be given consideration. Unfortunately, since it was not part of the finalized agreement, new negotiations would have to take place in order to address and resolve this issue.