Blow The Whistle On What You Heard Case Study


¶ … blow the whistle" on what you heard in the garden? If so, how will you blow the whistle? If you decide to blow the whistle, what are your reasons for doing so? Your discussion should reflect knowledge of what Boatright says about issues, problems and justifications for whistle-blowing. Also, in discussing the answers to these questions you should include the following: 1) you should evaluate real and potential conflicts of interests that confront you in your decision 2) you should explain how your reasoning is consistent or inconsistent with the three following moral theories: Kantian moral theory, utilitarian moral theory and virtue theory. The situation

Our MBA is not really aware of what is going on; all he has is assumptions, guesses. He has no actual proof. In the first case, he has had suspicions of several transactions -- their accounting practices seem suspect - and he has pointed out his concerns to the CFO. He has then been assured that all is fine and that they know what they are doing. In the garden, you hear the CFO speaking with some high-ranking person from Arthur Andersen. They speak about the practice of inflating Enron earnings and transferring debt to partners. The discussion has something to do with the sustainability of the practice and the possible consequences of discovery. Then you hear someone say that "It's really too late. We either make it work or the jig is up, and we try to contain the damage. In either case we all know what we should do with our stock." Since all of this is hearsay, however, and indirect, all you have to go on is, ultimately, conjecture....


You may be correct in suspecting something but you do not have absolute proof.
Should you report it?

On the one hand, you certainly can. In fact, you, more than anyone else, are in a position to do so since you are a member of their organization. Ideally, the employee should first report the possible corruption to the employer since he works for the good of the organization and, therefore, rather than leaking it publicly he should first approach the employer. The problem is: what if the employer (as in this case) is aware of the information and the public are suffering? In the case of the Enron scandal, countless individuals and companies were at risk of financial penury and loss due to Enron's conduct. The U.S., as a whole, in fact would suffer from the result. You, the MBA, have already approached your employer; he has assured you all is fine. You, nonetheless, still have suspicions. The question then is whether you should persist in going public with them.

Boatright's second condition is that the public must be given substantial information that serves as something that deserves notice. There is no question in this case, but that this is critical data that affects a significant amount of individuals and businesses and should certainly be revealed. Not only is this information of something new but it is also information of some substantial level of misconduct that denotes substantial importance. Enron stick was dropping, whilst investors were urged to continue buying until the Enron stock value finally fell to less than a dollar. Thousands of people lost their jobs as…

Sources Used in Documents:


"Behind the Enron Scandal - Multiple Articles." TIME 2002. 27 Apr. 2006 .

"BBC NEWS | Business | Enron Scandal At-a-Glance." BBC News. 22 Aug. 2002. The BBC. 27 Apr. 2006 .

"Enron Scandal - Information on Enron." Securities Fraud Fyi. 2003. 27 Apr. 2006 .

Hays, Kristin. "Prosecutor Questions Lay At Enron Trial." Business Week 27 Apr. 2006. 27 Apr. 2006

Cite this Document:

"Blow The Whistle On What You Heard" (2012, August 14) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from

"Blow The Whistle On What You Heard" 14 August 2012. Web.23 April. 2024. <>

"Blow The Whistle On What You Heard", 14 August 2012, Accessed.23 April. 2024,

Related Documents

Whistle-Blowers:Saints or Sinners Whistle-Blowers: Are They Saints or Sinners? Whistle-blowing is the professional form of playground tattling, jail house snitching, breaking the code of Omerta by a mafia kingpin. It is a socially discouraged practice and carries heavy sanctions - "unemployment, and often-times ridicule from [the] company." (Weinberg, March 14, 2005) Weinberg quotes David Stetler, a defense attorney who was part of the defense team for TAP, a pharmaceutical company whose prosecution

Whistle Blowing Introduction and History of Whistle Blowing Whistle blowing is the revealing of immoral, illegal or illegitimate deeds to authorities. The authorities may be insiders or from outside the affected organization. Many cases of whistle blowing involve people revealing information to outsiders especially media organizations or pressure groups about an act they consider to be irresponsible, irregular or illegal (Robbins, 1993). Cases of whistle blowing have increased dramatically in the recent

Le Grand Hautbois

Le Grand Hautbois During the reign of Louis XIII and especially Louis XIV, the courts were alive with new Baroque music and instruments. Many new wind instruments were being created with a variety of innovations and some other instruments were being newly invented. It was a time of experimentation, as these just introduced instruments had to be tried out for their range, sound and quality. Louis XIV from his childhood on

Some Chinese researchers assert that Chinese flutes may have evolved from of Indian provenance. In fact, the kind of side-blown, or transverse, flutes musicians play in Southeast Asia have also been discovered in Africa, India, Saudi Arabia, and Central Asia, as well as throughout the Europe of the Roman Empire. This suggests that rather than originating in China or even in India, the transverse flute might have been adopted through the

delineates a hypothetical disaster plan in response to a major earthquake and tsunami in New York City. The disaster plan includes pre-disaster / pre-event preparations, actions taken during the disaster, resources available during the disaster, and post-disaster / post-event strategies. The scope of the disaster plan includes establishment of a new residence and survival plan for disasters with long-term effects. Additionally, the disaster plan contains two separate components: One

Rights and Interests of Deaf

As a part of its responsibility to monitor federal agency compliance with Section 501, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) collects and compiles data regarding agencies' hiring and advancement of workers with disabilities. At the time of hiring, federal agencies provide employees the opportunity to self-disclose that they have a disability, on a Standard Form 256 (SF-256); the numbers of people who so identify are reported to the EEOC.