Compensation Philosophies Up To This Case Study

The focus as such now falls on responsible governance (Muller, 2012). Chapter 13 questions

1) Strategic importance of benefits

Today, the dynamics of the business environment are suffering dramatic challenges, emerging from various fields. Customers for instance become more demanding; the domestic and international competition intensifies; the technologies rapidly evolve and there is increased social pressure towards environmental sustainability (Brooks and Weatherson, 2000). In such a setting, it is imperative for the economic agents to rely on their staff members to help address these challenges. Today then, the employees are no longer just the force operating the machines, but they are the most valuable organizational asset (Mayo, 2001). In the creation and implementation of the benefits, it is essential for the employers to consider the differences between the motivating factors of various employees.

2) Health care costs

The health care situation in the United States has been growing more and more severe as the medical act become more solicited, as well as more expensive. The aging of the population, the increasing living standards or the technologic advancements all increase the costs of health care (Weinberg, 2007). And these costs are reflected at the level of employers, who are less and less able to ensure full medical coverage for their staff members, and this materializes in employee dissatisfactions, pressures and even conflicts between employers and employees.

The issue of the rising health care costs nevertheless is one of national importance, with ramifications obvious not only within the business climate, but at the level of the entire society. In such a setting then, it is believed that a solution should also be supported by the state, rather than...

...

2006, Pay without performance: the unfulfilled promise of executive compensation, Harvard University Press
Berger, L.A., Berger, D., 2008, The compensation handbook, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill Professional

Brooks, I., Weatherson, J., 2000, The business environment: challenges and changes, 2nd edition, Financial Times Prentice Hall

Brown, M., Heywood, J.S., 2002, Paying for performance: an international comparison, M.E. Sharpe

Gilbert, R.L., 2010, 7 steps for creating a viable pay for performance model, ASC Review, http://www.beckersasc.com/anesthesia/7-steps-for-creating-a-viable-pay-for-performance-model.html last accessed on April 26, 2012

Flannery, T.P., Hofrichter, D.A., Platten, P.E., 2002, People, performance and pay: dynamic compensation for changing organizations, Free Press

Mayo, A., 2001, The human value of the enterprise: valuing people as assets: monitoring, measuring, managing, Nicholas Brealey Publishing

Muller, D.C., 2012, The Oxford handbook of capitalism, Oxford University Press

Shi, L., Singh, D.A., 2011, Delivering health care in America: a systems approach, 5th edition, Jones & Bartlett Publishers

Snell, A., 2010, 5 steps to differentiated compensation, Taleo Research, http://www.taleo.com/talent-management-blog/2010/06/24/5-steps-to-differentiated-compensation / last accessed on April 26, 2012

Weinberg, S.E., 2007, U.S. healthcare on life support: resuscitating the dying system, Denisher Press

Employer's key steps in workers' compensation, Louisiana Workforce Commission, http://www.laworks.net/WorkersComp/OWC_employerkeysteps.asp last accessed on April 26, 2012

Sources Used in Documents:

References:

Bebchuck, L.A., Fried, J.M. 2006, Pay without performance: the unfulfilled promise of executive compensation, Harvard University Press

Berger, L.A., Berger, D., 2008, The compensation handbook, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill Professional

Brooks, I., Weatherson, J., 2000, The business environment: challenges and changes, 2nd edition, Financial Times Prentice Hall

Brown, M., Heywood, J.S., 2002, Paying for performance: an international comparison, M.E. Sharpe
Gilbert, R.L., 2010, 7 steps for creating a viable pay for performance model, ASC Review, http://www.beckersasc.com/anesthesia/7-steps-for-creating-a-viable-pay-for-performance-model.html last accessed on April 26, 2012
Snell, A., 2010, 5 steps to differentiated compensation, Taleo Research, http://www.taleo.com/talent-management-blog/2010/06/24/5-steps-to-differentiated-compensation / last accessed on April 26, 2012
Employer's key steps in workers' compensation, Louisiana Workforce Commission, http://www.laworks.net/WorkersComp/OWC_employerkeysteps.asp last accessed on April 26, 2012


Cite this Document:

"Compensation Philosophies Up To This" (2012, April 26) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/compensation-philosophies-up-to-this-56882

"Compensation Philosophies Up To This" 26 April 2012. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/compensation-philosophies-up-to-this-56882>

"Compensation Philosophies Up To This", 26 April 2012, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/compensation-philosophies-up-to-this-56882

Related Documents

Compensation Philosophy Introduction Compensation philosophy refers to the approach that a company takes to determining compensation. Total compensation is a mix of pay and benefits, and the structure that the pay takes as well. The compensation philosophy should be aligned with the company’s overall strategy. For example, Wal-Mart pays at low rates in order to help it compete on a low cost basis – a lower cost of doing business is conducive

This plan will help a company to cope with the challenges of having a high rate of employee turnover since the employees with get satisfaction in their work places from the bonus of their hard work. All in all, reward and appraisal are important tools used to ensure that employees are motivated and dedicated to their work hence retaining them and improving of the company's productivity. Therefore, every company should

Compensation Philosophy The current compensation philosophy of Lockheed Martin is based on a pay for performance ideal (Hartung, 2010). However, there is more to the issue than just paying for a person's performance. That performance (and pay) is based on the market, and how well the individual's performance contributed to the overall objectives of the company. Its goals are generally very clear, and those employees who work hard enough to help

Compensation is a sub-discipline of Human Resources Management and has become even more critical for organizations in the 21st century. Compensation, of course, is the salary or pay an employee receives from an organization and may fall into four categories: 1) Guaranteed Pay (fixed), 2) Variable Pay (Performance or results based); 3) Benefits (Medical, etc.), and 4) Equity-Based Compensation (Stock or organizational programs). There are many forms of compensation, many

Compensation Benefit Recommendations What companies in the relevant market are providing to employees A perfect compensation package is as different as the present workforce itself is. Indeed, it must be in place for organizations to attract and retain the best employees. Workers vary extraordinarily in age, sex, location, and marital status. They additionally doubtlessly differ in the way they work from home or at the workplace. Using a phone, a computer, or

Compensation Management Organizations can also effectively develop when strategic and tactical compensation issues are adequately addressed by the management. An organization's management has to recognize and integrate long-term strategic objectives with short-term tactical requirements (Henderson, 2006). Organizations should develop and operate compensation system that promotes fair treatment by relating job worth to differences in job requirements, recognize the worth and value of employee knowledge and skills. Some of the principal activities that