Conjoint Analysis Like Qualitative Researchers, Quantitative Researchers Research Paper

PAGES
5
WORDS
1277
Cite

Conjoint Analysis Like qualitative researchers, quantitative researchers also have a number of approaches available to them today. The selection of the research approach will depend on what type of information is being sought, what type of information is available, and the goals of the researcher. One research methodology that is gaining increasing popularity is conjoint analysis, a quantitative methodology that is discussed further below, followed by a summary of the research and important findings in the conclusion.

Description of Conjoint Analysis and Examples of Business Applications

Conjoint analysis is a quantitative methodology that measures the perceived values of various possible product designs (Calantone & Di Benedetto, 1990). Respondents participating in conjoint analyses view several variations in product concepts and then assign ranks with respect to their individual preferences (Calantone & Di Benedetto, 1990). The analysis of these responses can be used to identify the respective utility that is associated with each of the attributes ranked by the respondents, and these findings can then be used to identify the combination of attributes that consumers would likely most prefer (Calantone & Di Benedetto, 1990). According to Orme (2009), "Conjoint analysis has become one of the most widely-used quantitative methods in marketing research. When used properly, it provides reliable and useful results" (p. 1). Although there are a number of different conjoint analytical methods that employ different pairings of example products, the general goal is to "measure the perceived values of specific product features, to learn how demand for a particular product or service is related to price, and to forecast what the likely acceptance of a product would be if brought to market" (What is conjoint analysis?, 2011, para. 1).

Types of Management Problems Addressed by Conjoint Analysis

A number of researchers have used conjoint analysis to examine different aspects of management problems, including Wind, Grashof, and Goldhar (1978) who applied conjoint analysis to scientific and technical information services; Pekelman and Sen (1979) who used the method to improve the predictability of product acceptance...

...

In addition, conjoint analysis also appears to have the potential to play an increasingly useful role in the identification of consumer preferences with respect to environmental issues (Bateman & Willis, 1999).
Relationship between the Management Problem and the Research Purpose/Objectives addressed by Conjoint Analysis

As the nation's largest healthcare provider, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare Management System has a mandate to provide the best possible care for its veteran patients, making the identification of reliable and efficient data analysis methods an important and timely enterprise. For instance, although conjoint analysis has not been found particularly useful as a peer-review tool by healthcare providers, it has been shown to be increasingly popular as a "basis for examination of patients' preferences and valuation of options in decision making" (Bowling & Ebrahim, 2005, p. 346).

Representative Examples of the Research Objectives Addressed by Conjoint Analysis

Detailed Description of the Methodology

According to Bateman and Willis (1999), "Conjoint analysis is based on judgments on a carefully constructed set of hypothetical cases that allow for capture of the 'partworths' of each cue-utility at each of its levels. So linearity of cue use is not assumed, but simplification of cues into different levels is necessary" (p. 346). A sample protocol for developing a conjoint analysis is provided in Table 1 below:

Table 1

Conjoint Analysis Protocol

Step

Description

Identify key attributes (or factors) and levels

This is probably the most important step in the design of conjoint analysis studies since the selection of the proper attributes will have an impact on our ability to reflect how buyers make purchase decisions. Qualitative research or other research sources should be used to provide realistic attributes. The presentation of attribute levels is not restricted to text. We can use images when appropriate; here, Mora cites Orme's attributes or factors that should be used to develop this step in the conjoint analysis as follows:

1. Cover the full…

Sources Used in Documents:

references: Theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the U.S., EU, and developing countries. New York:

Bowling, A. & Ebrahim, S. (2005). Handbook of health research methods: Investigation, measurement and analysis. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

Calantone, R.J. & Benedetto, C.A. (1990). Successful industrial product innovation: An integrative literature review. New York: Greenwood Press.

Mora, M. (2011). Conjoint analysis and realism in price research. Relevant Insights. Retrieved from http://relevantinsights.com/conjoint-analysis.

Orme, B. (2009). Which conjoint analysis method should I use? Sawtooth Software Research
Paper Series. Retrieved from http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/
What is conjoint analysis. (2012). Sawtooth Software. Retrieved from http://www.


Cite this Document:

"Conjoint Analysis Like Qualitative Researchers Quantitative Researchers" (2012, January 18) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/conjoint-analysis-like-qualitative-researchers-53670

"Conjoint Analysis Like Qualitative Researchers Quantitative Researchers" 18 January 2012. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/conjoint-analysis-like-qualitative-researchers-53670>

"Conjoint Analysis Like Qualitative Researchers Quantitative Researchers", 18 January 2012, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/conjoint-analysis-like-qualitative-researchers-53670

Related Documents

The third position means stepping outside the situation and seeing issues from the point-of-view of a third party. NLP reminds us that people receive information in various sensory channels: the visual, the auditory, the kinaesthetic (perception of movement of effort) and the digital mathematical or reasoned thinking (Taylor, 2000). The idea being that people use all of these modes, but may have a preferred mode. Ethnographic approach: this takes its