Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
The other example is that of heavy regulation as found in the U.S. And the UK. This sort of regulation results in increased controls and governance because heavy regulation doesn't lead to reduced controls and this would again lead to heavy investment in controls. This heavy investment is undesirable since it becomes Pareto inefficient. The general affect of regulation is to restrict the variation in demand for controls while simultaneously raising investment level in an otherwise unregulated environment like New Zealand.
The problem with this study is that it has some limitations which may have been affecting the results. For one we did not have full access to publicly available information and thus we may not have assessed...
This is particularly true in the case of internal auditing activities since we did not have access to full information on those. Further research would be needed to correct these possible errors and fill the gaps. Secondly we were also limited by the lack of knowledge about the quality of internal controls being used. Since the quality was unknown, this may have affected the relevance of our results to the overall issue.
Despite these limitations, we have managed to discover a complex link between risks and controls and this finding merits further research. It would be interesting to discover how this relationship works in a heavily regulated environment especially under the Sarbanes-Oxley…
This relationship was seen in New Zealand in 1995 however it may not be always be correct to increase controls and investment in controls if we want it to be Pareto efficiency. This concept says that allocation from one set of goods to another should only be made when this transfer would make the other set richer but the first set not any worse off. This however is not possible under the form of governance and control seen in New Zealand. The other example is that of heavy regulation as found in the U.S. And the UK. This sort of regulation results in increased controls and governance because heavy regulation doesn't lead to reduced controls and this would again lead to heavy investment in controls. This heavy investment is undesirable since it becomes Pareto inefficient. The general affect of regulation is to restrict the variation in demand for controls while simultaneously raising investment level in an otherwise unregulated environment like New Zealand.
The problem with this study is that it has some limitations which may have been affecting the results. For one we did not have full access to publicly available information and thus we may not have assessed controls effectively. This is particularly true in the case of internal auditing activities since we did not have access to full information on those. Further research would be needed to correct these possible errors and fill the gaps. Secondly we were also limited by the lack of knowledge about the quality of internal controls being used. Since the quality was unknown, this may have affected the relevance of our results to the overall issue.
Despite these limitations, we have managed to discover a complex link between risks and controls and this finding merits further research. It would be interesting to discover how this relationship works in a heavily regulated environment especially under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Ethics of Repatriation-Egyptian Artifacts Egyptians making efforts to get their artifacts back The artifacts that get stolen from a country are hard to get back as, the country from which they are stolen would have to ask the authorities of the other country to help them find those artifacts or fight a legal battle in the courts of the other country which can not only be very time consuming but also
Fire: A Debate Over its Origins The ability to control fire was clearly a turning point in human history, although the conditions which enabled humans to master the ability to control fire remains controversial amongst anthropologists. The fact that it was understood that fire was a significant milestone is evident even in myth, as the god Prometheus is depicted as offering fire to the first humans, and thus giving humans godlike
S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reaffirm restrictive gun laws since the Second Amendment was not infringed by a law that requires firearm owners to demonstrate proper cause (Nimmo par, 2). The unanimous decision by the three-judge panel was regarded as a victory for the New York State law, the American constitution, and families throughout New York who are appropriately concerned regarding the plight of gun violence that is a major
Free Will and Determinism From a theological viewpoint, human free will may not exist at all, since God is all-knowing and all-powerful, the destiny of each individual is determined from the beginning to time. Augustine, Martin Luther, John Calvin and Jonathan Edwards all believed this, and before modern times it was the most common position in Christianity. Human life is also determined by certain physical and natural laws that exist in
Additionally, the utilitarian position presents the advantage of objectively quantifying the interests of everyone affected by the decision, for the sole purpose of promoting common welfare. Thus, harvesting, fertilizing, genetically screening, implanting and researching human embryos at the risk of damaging or destroying them - is entirely justified from this perspective, and any progressive endeavor is encouraged. Nevertheless, this approach might involuntarily discourage many IVF clients as it appears to
Salvation Debate- Calvinism and Arminianism Calvinism and Arminianism are two different systems of theology that attempt to explain the relationship between God's sovereignty and man's free will. What differentiates these views is the issue of free will and whether people have any as compared to God's will. Some people claim that God's will supersedes human will in all situations if God's will is different. On the other hand, some people