Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … theories presented by Elman Service and Timothy Earle on the evolution of chiefdoms.
Both Elman Service and Timothy Earle were anthropologists who wrote about the concept of chiefdoms. Service's work represents some of the pioneering efforts of Western Civilization to formally study and analyze various facects of chiefdoms. Since Earle's work came after Service's, he was able to use the latter's ideas as a starting point for comparisons and contrasts with his own. As such, there are poignant similarities between the tenets of these two authors as related to chiefdoms, as well as critical dissimilarities. On the whole, it appears that the more modern perspective of Earle is the more convincing.
It is important to realize that Service contextualized the development of chiefdoms within the wider process of socialization as it occurs within a civilization. Quite imply, he viewed chiefdom as a stage in social evolution between that of a tribe and a formal state. Service postulated the fact that chiefdoms stemmed through a sort of regional mutualism, in which there were benefits of the chiefdom for both the leaders and the followers. The benefits for the leader were that he could amass a following under a form of centralized leadership. The benefits for the followers were that the leader could help to provide order and stability for them in way that they were able to obtain their basic resources for...
The key tenet usually imputed to Service and his idea of chiefdom is that there was a symbiotic relationship between the leader or chief and his followers, which helped to form the basis of the chiefdom.
The primary similarity between the aforementioned ideas of Service and those of Earle revolve around the basic notion of the term chiefdom and its definition. Both authors agreed that chiefdoms arose from situations in which there was a group of people bound by familial ties in which there was a formal or semiformal aristocracy akin to a council of elders. From such a council comes forth a chief to represent the rest of the society as its leader. The critical factor is that chiefs have not necessarily earned their status, yet have had their title as leader ascribed to them.
Despite the similar recognition of both authors of what a chiefdom is and how it relates to non-industrialized societies, Earle's main thoughts on the developments of chiefdoms different from Service's. Whereas Service believed that chiefdoms were based on mutual benefit between leaders and followers, Earle posited the notion that the chief aim of chiefdoms was power. That power, of course, is actualized by the leader. Moreover, such power is represented in the form of economic resources and other resources. Earle believes that the attainment of these resources is the principle objectives of chiefs which they use to base…
theories presented by Elman Service and Timothy Earle on the evolution of chiefdoms. There were many different things that Franz Boas did to help improve the field of anthropology at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century. A number of the advancements he made were in the field of physical anthropology. Even more advancements pertained to improvements in this science as a whole which
Giftedness is an intellectual ability that is significantly higher than average, not a skill, but an innate talent and aptitude that may be general or specific. Just as there are special needs for children who appear on the left side of the bell curve, so should there be for children on the far right. However, these students are often neglected in terms of special programing due to beliefs that they
All it is really accomplishes is forcibly transferring wealth from one party to another. These transfers can actually create new market failures by forming barriers to market entry, and creating unfair competitive advantages through subsidies, tariffs, tax-breaks and regulations that favor one party over another. Fundamental to the notion of government regulation is that its purpose is to eliminate unfairness in competition. However, powerful businesses have huge influences on policy making in
Instead, IBM began to falter after a series of product failures. As a result, many companies gained market share against IBM with some even over taking it; an efficient market took care of the issue. Yet, another example of why government should not interfere with market structures is the airline industry. After 1978, the airline industry was quickly transformed into an oligopoly market structure where only a half dozen or
political framework of EU and OCT European Union (EU) and Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) are in association with each other via a system which is based on the provisions of part IV of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU), consisting of detailed rules and measures which are laid down in the document issued on 27th November 2001 title Oversees Association Decision. The expiry date of this
Since the monopoly controls so much of the market share, the producers of goods have no choice other than to sell to the firm at lower prices, meeting their demand. This causes the market to stagnate, in that the producers of the goods must increase their production, but lower their margins (Federal Trade Commission, 2002). The same occurs for merged companies. Regardless of the type of merger, the end result