Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
(Work) Employee Communication and Monitoring
According to Miller and Hollowell (2016), “the emergence of Facebook and other social networking sites has created a number of legal and ethical issues for businesses” (p. 98). In the recent past, there have been instances of people being fired because of posts or utterances made on their social media accounts. This is more so the case given that the line between professional life and personal life is increasingly being blurred, thanks to the prevalence of social media. One such instance involved Ashley Payne.
Summary of the Case
Payne, a high school teacher, was forced to resign from her teaching position after a parent complained of a picture she had posted in her Facebook account in 2009 holding alcoholic drinks in both of her hands. The school administration was also of the opinion that a B-word she had used in her page was offensive and unprofessional. The complaint made to the school administration came from a single parent. It is also important to note that at the time Payne made the said posts, her Facebook privacy settings were set to ‘high’, which effectively means that any picture posted could only be viewed by those who were her pals on the said social media platform....
One of her friends on Facebook, it was revealed, was one of her students – effectively meaning that the said student had access to Payne’s profile. It was this particular student’s parent who filed an anonymous complaint against Payne.
Decision
Payne claimed that she was pressured to resign after the school gave her two options – suspension or resignation. It was after she reconsidered her decision to resign that she filed “a writ of mandamus alleging that the Georgia Fair Dismissal Act entitled Payne to a hearing and appropriate compensation” (Oppenheim, 2013). The school district on the other hand, as Oppenheim further points out filed a summary judgment motion, in response, whereby the court made a ruling to the effect that “Payne’s resignation meant that she was disqualified for protection under the act.”
Personal Opinion
I am opposed to the court’s ruling in this case for a number of reasons. The court deemed Payne’s resignation as having been willful – especially given that two options were presented to her, i.e. resignation or suspension. She had the freedom of choosing either. There is another larger matter, however, that ought to be examined…
Monitoring Employees Employee Monitoring Discussion In the United States, employment law is based on a minimal expectation of privacy (Rosser, 2011). This means the interest of the business takes precedence over the employee's right to privacy. If an employee is conducting personal business on the employer's property, or using the employer's property, such as computers, to conduct personal business, the employee's business is not private under law. The Securities and Exchange Commission and
In particular, employees can feel as though they have a lack of privacy and that they are constantly being micro-managed. Studies have shown that workers who are monitored through outlets such as call centres have elevated levels of depression and anxiety (Holman, 2002). As the worker loses their autonomy, it is also common for them to lose a substantial degree of intrinsic motivation. Another negative consequence of employee monitoring is
Employee Privacy Torts Issues relating to employee privacy have been at the forefront of businesses for many years. This has been fuelled by the dynamic workplace which changes constantly and also by employees and employers being more litigation-conscious. Technology has also spurred on employee privacy issues with e-mail and the internet being related to heightened concerns about vulnerability of employers to litigation. Many employers have thus exacerbated their concerns relating to
Employee Privacy Torts History of Employee Privacy Changing Trends of Employee Privacy Impact of Innovative Technology on Employee Privacy Role of Social Media towards Employee Privacy Impact of Changing Community/Society on Employee Privacy Adaptation to the new Environment pertaining to Employee Privacy Employee Monitoring and Surveillance Laws and Employer Policies for Text Messaging and Social Media Electronic Communication Privacy Act Monitoring of Employee Conversations over Telephone & Email Recommendations for creating Effective Policies Future Implications of Employee Privacy As years have passed and
Employee E-Mail and Internet Privacy Policies The increased usage of the Internet and e-mail has changed the way companies do business. Nearly instantaneous communication can take place globally. Information on a countless number of topics can now be accessed from anywhere around the world. These technological developments have not only helped employees increase their efficiencies, but also has given them a new means of distraction from their duties. For this reason,
Monitoring Employees Electronic monitoring is often necessary to detect violations of company rules and policies and criminal activity. However, the employer must balance its need to protect the company with their employees' rights to privacy. This paper describes steps a business should take to make sure that the employee is treated fairly. An Acceptable Use policy should be established to inform employees that they will be monitored and for what purposes. This