Ethical and Criminal Responsibility
The employers have ethical obligations to undertake corrective and preventive actions as managers gain awareness of their legal responsibilities. For this reason, the top management should be aware of the reasons for actions and the danger from employees to other people. Under many work laws, employees are proving the counterfactual aspect through instilling affirmative defense. The defenses defeat all forms of employer liability within worker's suits as well as the preclusion of remedies. The reinstatement and front pay is based on the payback periods and other forms of time where employers discover the level of misconduct among employees. The defense pervades work law and other international Labor principles. The federal and state statutes on employment discrimination allow for tort law and state contract to take charge of the compensation statutes used by the various state workers. The legal commentary on human resource management is a critical component to consider.
It matters whether employers have irrefutable evidence that such employees pose the danger. Further, it is their responsibility to disseminate valuable information about the employee's reasonable suspicion to similar actions. Various state courts justify employee-misconduct defenses to contract liabilities through emphasizing on the principles of state contract law. Such material failure for different...
The fraudulent-inducement defenses have fundamentally different state courts with the reasonable adoption of employee misconduct arguments within contract liability and other wrongful discharges. The opaque grounds are described as states that recognize common law tort claims. The illicit discharges within the violation of public human resource management policy are stipulated as recognition for employee misconduct defense. This follows the preclusion of reinstatements, full back pay, and front pay (Kibert, 2010).
That obligation runs along the employer with ethical obligations taking refuge for preventive or corrective action. Conventional twin policies in the liability include fair compensation to victims and deterrence of alternative harm (Bertagni, Rosa & Salvetti, 2010). The goals are served through holding employers liable in each of the wrongful acts performed by employees. Liability within this case is any solicitation of employment contexts with unfair dealings by the company and enterprise at risk. Holding employers liable deters future harm as employers can position to reduce sexual harassment accidents and other intentional wrongs through proper supervision and organization of employees.
However, the independent contractor relationships are different. Ideally, the necessary level of closeness holds hirers liable for wrongs committed by the independent contractors. International practice is different as this is deemed as an unfair practice. The main reason is that such wrongs are not materialized through the organization's internal risks…
Hypothetical firm -- Pharmacare -- and address the issues of corporate responsibility and ethics. Background Information on Case New Jersey-based company, Pharmacare (We CARE about YOUR health®) counts among the leading pharmaceutical firms across the globe. It is reputed for being an ethical, well-managed and caring corporation that manufactures superior-quality products aimed at saving the lives of millions and enhancing the QOL (quality of life) of millions of other people. Its offering
(Southwest Airlines Corporation) The employees are always put first at Southwest Airlines, and according to the CEO Herb Kelleher, who was responsible for founding the company Southwest Airlines, the philosophy that employees come first is deeply embedded in the psyche of the company, and if the employees of the company are happy and contented and fully satisfied with their work, then they will most definitely take better care of the
Technology / Privacy / Workplace There is a rapidly increasing use of technological monitoring in the workplace, and while technology in general has been highly beneficial to companies, the use of some technologies has raised privacy and ethical concerns among employees. This paper reviews the available literature when it comes to workplace monitoring of employees and the ethical implications of that monitoring. Is Privacy in the Workplace a Dying Notion? The right to
Corporate Responsibility and Marketing Strategies Apple Inc. Ethics and social responsibility Apple is known across the globe for its quality products and up-to-date technology that allows the users to feel to be ahead of other brands hence forming an ardent brand community with great brand loyalty. In order to achieve these technologies, Apple often outsources parts and even services from developing nations particularly in the Asian world. The reason for the preference
Expatriate HR The author of this report has been asked to consider a situation where a number of expatriates will be brought on to work with the company at a new subsidiary that has just been established. As part of that new subsidiary being brought online, there is to be a designing and implementation of a comprehensive human resources program that covers two out of four major points. Those points will
Law and Ethics in the Business Environment RIGHT FROM WRONG Business Ethics and the Law Business law fixes the minimum standards of behavior for businesses (Bramble, 2013). Enforcing these laws generally consists of fines involved in the exercise of trade and commerce. Criminal accountabilities must be proven in the appropriate court of law through evidence. Even when found culpable, a business can only be fined as a penalty. But business ethics exceeds simple