Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Constitution Of Term Paper

The Federalists view of the Constitution was one that questioned the compromises required in ratification of the Constitution as compared to the provisions of the 'Articles of Confederation'. However, there was more faith in and respect among Antifederalists for legislative power and it was their belief that "bicameralism and the separation of powers" was the appropriate means for checking the system. The Federalists viewed these checks and balance devices as merely checks on the power of the legislature and a tool in driving the power of the executive and judicial branches of government. Concerns of the Antifederalists included concerns over taxation of citizens and the possible enslavement of citizens to the government in its power to tax and as well they questioned how limited a congress actually was that had the power to pass all laws with only the requirement that the laws be "necessary and proper." (Semonche, 2003; p.3) the Antifederalists were further concerned because they contended that there was a departure of the Constitution in the conference of powers on government rather than what they viewed should be a limiting of those government powers. The Constitutional debate in Philadelphia lasted under the period of a year and the Antifederalists concluded that the document was legitimate...

...

The Ant federalist legacy lives still and the debate of 1787 which took place in Philadelphia lives on in today's political landscape in the United States.
SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

Those who hold that the government of today is too large and its powers overbroad still lean to the writings and arguments of the Antifederalists and this debate still goes forth in today's politics both at the federal and state levels. The scope of today's federal national government has grown to a broader scope than even imagined by the Antifederalists and even today, the Antifederalist sentiment can be heard throughout the political arena in the United States.

Bibliography

Semonche, John E. (2003) the Debate Over the Constitution: Federalists vs. Antifederalists. Yale University 2003 Online available at: www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1982/3/82.03.03.x.html

Hannah, R. (nd) Federalists vs. Antifederalists: The Nature of Government & the Constitution. Online available at: cmweb.pvschools.net/~pburr/docs/amhis/12th%20Grade%20-%20Government.pdf

Siemers, David J. (2002) Ratifying the Republic: Antifederalists and Federalists in Constitutional Time. Stanford University Press. 2002.

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Semonche, John E. (2003) the Debate Over the Constitution: Federalists vs. Antifederalists. Yale University 2003 Online available at: www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1982/3/82.03.03.x.html

Hannah, R. (nd) Federalists vs. Antifederalists: The Nature of Government & the Constitution. Online available at: cmweb.pvschools.net/~pburr/docs/amhis/12th%20Grade%20-%20Government.pdf

Siemers, David J. (2002) Ratifying the Republic: Antifederalists and Federalists in Constitutional Time. Stanford University Press. 2002.


Cite this Document:

"Federalists Vs Anti-Federalists Constitution Of" (2008, April 01) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/federalists-vs-anti-federalists-constitution-31067

"Federalists Vs Anti-Federalists Constitution Of" 01 April 2008. Web.23 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/federalists-vs-anti-federalists-constitution-31067>

"Federalists Vs Anti-Federalists Constitution Of", 01 April 2008, Accessed.23 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/federalists-vs-anti-federalists-constitution-31067

Related Documents

Federalist and Anti-Federalist Review Federalist papers were written in support of the ratification of the U.S. constitution while anti-federalists were written in opposition of the same. The most important papers in federalist series were paper 10 and 5 both written by James Madison on the subject of power distribution within the federation. Anti-federalist paper 3 was written under the pseudonym Brutus and meant to oppose the arguments raised by Madison on

Federalist Papers The purpose of the Federalist Papers The Federalist Papers were prepared to ensure that a constitution was ratified to provide a perfect union. The Papers focused on the concept of a perfect and improved union. While this could be the primary purpose of the document, it was also concerned with other things. Aspects of the federalist like welfare, safety, and union are inseparable, and the union seems to be much

As a result, the Bill of Rights was implemented into the Constitution, to address the concerns of anti-federalists. While at the same time, it gave the federalists a strong central government that could adjust with: the various changes. This is significant, because it shows how the Constitution is a working document that seeks to provide a balance between: personal freedoms and the need to protect the nation. In many ways,

In addition it was agreed that issues of federal budget, revenue and taxation would originate with the House of Representatives. The Great Compromise issued in a spirit of success to the convention and essentially ended the division between the small and large states. However, it did nothing to alleviate the pending debate between the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. Decisions on how much power to give to the people and to

Constitution Debates
PAGES 5 WORDS 1619

Constitution Debates During the intellectual debate over the Constitution, the Anti-Federalist case against the Federalists' proposed system of checks and balances was made in a number of different ways. It is worth understanding the logic of the Anti-Federalists' arguments before we turn to the Federalist response to those arguments. A first case made against checks and balances is an obvious one: that it diminishes direct accountability to the people on the part

Anti-Federalist & Bill of Rights The Anti-federalist vs. Federalist argument is one of the most heated political debates the United States has ever seen. Though the length of the actual debate was relatively short, lasting from October of 1787, when the final version of the constitution was approved by the first congressional convention to June of 1788 when Virginia was the first to ratify the constitution of the United States. The